in Re Stewart Feldman and the Feldman Law Firm, LLP
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 5, 2020.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-20-00132-CV
IN RE STEWART FELDMAN AND THE FELDMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
80th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2019-07407
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On February 11, 2020, relators Stewart Feldman and The Feldman Law Firm, LLP filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable Larry Weiman, presiding judge of the 80th District Court of Harris County, to (1) vacate the January 28, 2020 order granting real parties in interests’ motion to compel discovery; (2) rule on the merits of relators’ pending
motion to compel arbitration before any hearing on real parties in interests’ request for injunctive relief; and (3) issue a ruling on the motion to compel arbitration within a timeframe the court deems expeditious and appropriate.
Relators have not shown that they are entitled to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny relators’ emergency motion for stay.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Wise, and Zimmerer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Stewart Feldman and the Feldman Law Firm, LLP (in Re Stewart Feldman and the Feldman Law Firm, LLP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.