In re Stewart
This text of 334 Fed. Appx. 854 (In re Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
The appellant, The Bankruptcy Law Firm, P.C., through its principal attorney, Kathleen P. March, who served as the debtor’s attorney, appeals the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) affirming the Central District of California bankruptcy court’s order disallowing certain fees under 11 U.S.C. § 330 for counsel’s representation of the debtor in his Chapter 13 case. The BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court’s fee determination. We ordered the matter to be submitted on briefs. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2)(C).
After carefully reviewing the record, the controlling law, and the appellant’s brief, we conclude that issuance of a full opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose and would be duplicative. We AFFIRM, for the reasons stated in the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s opinion.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
334 Fed. Appx. 854, 334 F. App'x 854, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23316, 2009 WL 3389635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stewart-ca9-2009.