in Re: Stewart A. Cross
This text of in Re: Stewart A. Cross (in Re: Stewart A. Cross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
'
' No. 08-12-00303-CR
IN RE: STEWART A. CROSS, ' AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
Relator. ' IN MANDAMUS '
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Stewart A. Cross, is an inmate presently incarcerated at the Lynaugh Unit of the
Texas Department of Criminal Justice in Pecos County, Texas. On September 24, 2012, the
Clerk of the Eighth Court of Appeals responded to Relator’s written motion for a free transcript of
the statement of facts in the appeal of his case. In her correspondence to Relator, the Clerk
explained that because the Court had affirmed the trial court’s judgment and the Court of Criminal
Appeals had dismissed his petition for discretionary review, the Court is not required to provide
Relator with a free copy of the record or any documents filed in his appeal.1 The Clerk also
informed Relator of the price and acceptable payment methods for purchasing copies of the
appellate record from the Court.
Relator subsequently filed in this Court a pro se petition for writ of mandamus requesting
that we compel the 203rd District Court of Dallas County, in which he was convicted, to provide
1 See Cross v. State, No. 08-02-00170-CR, 2003 WL 253902, at *1 (Tex.App.–El Paso February 6, 2003, pet. dism’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). him a free copy of his record on appeal.2 A Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to issue a writ of
mandamus against a district or county court judge in the Court’s district and against a district court
judge acting as a magistrate in a court of inquiry in the Court’s district.3 TEX. GOV’T CODE
ANN. § 22.221(b) (West 2004). However, because Dallas County is not within the Eighth Court
of Appeals district, we are without jurisdiction to consider Relator’s petition. TEX. GOV’T
CODE ANN. § 22.201(i) (West Supp. 2012); TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b) (West
2004). In re Davis, 87 S.W.3d 794, 795 (Tex.App.–Texarkana 2002, orig. proceeding).
The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice October 31, 2012
Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, J., and Antcliff, J.
(Do Not Publish)
2 Although Relator has not directly specified that he is requesting that we compel the 203rd District Court to provide him with the free records he seeks, he has asserted that the trial court has a duty to provide him with the requested record. We therefore construe Relator’s petition as seeking relief against the 203rd District Court of Dallas County. 3 The Supreme Court of Texas has jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a court of appeals. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.002(a) (West 2004). 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Stewart A. Cross, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stewart-a-cross-texapp-2012.