In re Stevenson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Stevenson

143 A.D. 901, 127 N.Y.S. 1146

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Stevenson. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 A.D. 789 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1911·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In this case a motion was made to confirm the supplemental report of the referee with a proposed final decree. There was submitted in opposition an affidavit of the corporation counsel stating that he had not had time to examine the decree, and asking that the entry he postponed until such time as he could submit papers in opposition to it. No memorandum has been received either from the corporation counsel or from any of the other parties in relation to this decree. The parties are requested to appear on March 7, 1911, [902]*902at half-past ten, and submit any objection to the form of the decree presented by the petitioners. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

In this case a motion was made to confirm the supplemental report of the referee with a proposed final decree. There was submitted in opposition an affidavit of the corporation counsel stating that he had not had time to examine the decree, and asking that the entry he postponed until such time as he could submit papers in opposition to it. No memorandum has been received either from the corporation counsel or from any of the other parties in relation to this decree. The parties are requested to appear on March 7, 1911, [902]*902at half-past ten, and submit any objection to the form of the decree presented by the petitioners. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ.

In re Stevenson, 143 A.D. 901, 127 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

143 A.D. 901 (In re Stevenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.