in Re: Stevens Roofing Systems

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 19, 2006
Docket13-05-00653-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Stevens Roofing Systems (in Re: Stevens Roofing Systems) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Stevens Roofing Systems, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

                            COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

                             NUMBER 13-05-653-CV

                   IN RE:  STEVENS ROOFING SYSTEMS

                      On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

                             NUMBER 13-05-654-CV

STEVENS ROOFING SYSTEMS,                                  Appellant,

                                           v.

CAMERON COUNTY,                                                 Appellee.

                  On appeal from the 404th District Court

                          of Cameron County, Texas.

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, STEVENS ROOFING SYSTEMS, perfected an appeal in cause number 13-05-654-CV from an order entered by the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2004-02-1208-G.  A petition for writ of mandamus was filed by Stevens Roofing Systems in cause number 13-05-653-CV.  Stevens Roofing Systems has now filed motions to dismiss the appeal and petition for writ of mandamus.  In the motion, Stevens Roofing Systems states that the underlying case has been resolved, and it requests that this Court dismiss the appeal and the petition for writ of mandamus.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the motions to dismiss the appeal and petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that the motions should be granted.  The motions to dismiss are granted.  The petition for writ of mandamus and appeal are hereby DISMISSED.  Costs are adjudged against the party incurring same.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 19th day of January, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Stevens Roofing Systems, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stevens-roofing-systems-texapp-2006.