In re Stevens

32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1095, 1978 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 433
CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois
DecidedSeptember 5, 1978
DocketNo. 77-CV-0077
StatusPublished

This text of 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1095 (In re Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Stevens, 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1095, 1978 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 433 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1978).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This claim arises out of an incident that occurred on June 23, 1976. Ruby Gale Stevens, mother of the deceased victim, seeks compensation pursuant to the provisions of the “Crime Victims Compensation Act,” hereafter referred to as the Act, (Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 70, §71, et seq.).

This Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed and furnished by the Court, and a report of the Attorney General of the State of Illinois which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted before the Court, the Court finds:

1. That the Claimant’s deceased son, Stephen Eric Skibba, age 16, was allegedly a victim of a crime of violence, as set forth in sec. 2(c) of the Act, to wit: Murder (Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 38, §9-1).

2. That on June 23,1976, Claimant’s son was shot by James R. Michels as he was attempting to leave the assailant’s automobile after the victim had accepted a ride while hitch-hiking.

3. That sec. 3(f) of the Act provides that a person is entitled to compensation under the Act if the injury to or death of the victim was not substantially attributable to the victim’s wrongful act.

4. That it appears from the investigatory report and police report that the victim’s death was attributable to his wrongful act of hitch-hiking in violation of Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 95.5, sec. 11-1006.

5. That the Claimant’s claim does not meet a required condition precedent for the right to compensation under the Act.

It is hereby ordered that the claim of Ruby Gale Stevens be, and is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1095, 1978 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stevens-ilclaimsct-1978.