In Re: Steven Wayne Russell v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: Steven Wayne Russell v. the State of Texas (In Re: Steven Wayne Russell v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed April 19, 2023
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00328-CV
IN RE STEVEN WAYNE RUSSELL, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 196th Judicial District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11673
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Carlyle, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness Relator petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court
to deliver a copy of his judgment to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.
To be entitled to mandamus relief in a criminal case, relator must show (1) that
he has no adequate remedy at law and (2) that what he seeks to compel is a
ministerial act. In re State ex rel. Weeks, 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App.
2013) (orig. proceeding). Relator bears the burden to provide the Court with a
sufficient record to establish his right to relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833,
837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
Relator has not provided this Court with a record establishing his right to
relief, and his petition does not comply with several of the requirements set out in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3, 52.7. Accordingly,
we deny the petition.
/Robbie Partida-Kipness/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE
230328F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Steven Wayne Russell v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steven-wayne-russell-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.