In re Steven Joseph B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Steven Joseph B.

126 A.D.2d 638, 510 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41769

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 126 A.D.2d 638 (In re Steven Joseph B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Steven Joseph B., 126 A.D.2d 638, 510 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child neglect proceeding, the mother appeals from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Kings County (Gartenstein, J.), dated November 19, 1985, which, following a finding of neglect, placed the infant with the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for a period of 18 months.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The challenged placement is fully supported by the record. The mother is, of course, free to follow the suggestion of the Family Court, if she be so advised, to apply for an early termination of the challenged placement based upon a determination of a substantial effort at rehabilitation. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child neglect proceeding, the mother appeals from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Kings County (Gartenstein, J.), dated November 19, 1985, which, following a finding of neglect, placed the infant with the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for a period of 18 months.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The challenged placement is fully supported by the record. The mother is, of course, free to follow the suggestion of the Family Court, if she be so advised, to apply for an early termination of the challenged placement based upon a determination of a substantial effort at rehabilitation. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 A.D.2d 638, 510 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steven-joseph-b-nyappdiv-1987.