In Re Steven Hotze M.D. v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Steven Hotze M.D. v. the State of Texas (In Re Steven Hotze M.D. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed November 26, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-24-00878-CV
IN RE STEVEN HOTZE M.D., Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-18494
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On Monday, November 18, 2024, relator, Steven Hotze M.D., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Donna Roth, presiding judge of the 295th District Court of Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s October 5, 2024 “Order Denying Defendant’s Second Motion to Stay Case” and order the trial court to grant its “Motion to Stay and/or Abate Proceeding.”
Relator has not demonstrated that he is entitled to the relief requested. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Poissant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Steven Hotze M.D. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steven-hotze-md-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.