In Re Steven Hotze M.D. v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 26, 2024·No. 14-24-00878-CV·Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed November 26, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00878-CV

IN RE STEVEN HOTZE M.D., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

295th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-18494

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Monday, November 18, 2024, relator, Steven Hotze M.D., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Donna Roth, presiding judge of the 295th District Court of Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s October 5, 2024 “Order Denying Defendant’s

Second Motion to Stay Case” and order the trial court to grant its “Motion to Stay and/or Abate Proceeding.”

Relator has not demonstrated that he is entitled to the relief requested. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Poissant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Steven Hotze M.D. v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

In Re Steven Hotze M.D. v. the State of Texas (In Re Steven Hotze M.D. v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.