in Re Steven Frankoff
This text of in Re Steven Frankoff (in Re Steven Frankoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 14, 2010.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-10-00955-CV
IN RE STEVEN FRANKOFF, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On October 4, 2010, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asked this court to reverse an order signed July 14, 2010, by the Honorable Randy Wilson, presiding judge of the 157th District Court of Harris County.
Relator has filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order signed July 14, 2010, and that appeal is currently pending before this court, No. 14-10-00705-CV, Steven Frankoff v. Susan Norman and Michael Easton. Relator has not demonstrated that his appeal is an inadequate remedy by law; therefore, relator is not entitled to mandamus relief. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992). Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Boyce, and Sullivan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Steven Frankoff, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steven-frankoff-texapp-2010.