in Re: Steven E. Cottingham
This text of in Re: Steven E. Cottingham (in Re: Steven E. Cottingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§ No. 08-14-00285-CR IN RE § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING STEVEN E. COTTINGHAM, ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF § MANDAMUS RELATOR. §
JUDGMENT
The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus
against the Honorable William E. Moody, Judge of the 34th District Court of El Paso, Texas, and
concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. We therefore deny the
petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014.
YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice
Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Steven E. Cottingham, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steven-e-cottingham-texapp-2014.