in Re Steven Dwayne Gilbert

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 4, 2018·No. 09-18-00372-CV·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

NO. 09-18-00372-CV

IN RE STEVEN DWAYNE GILBERT

Original Proceeding

1A District Court of Jasper County, Texas Trial Cause No. 13133JD

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Steven Dwayne Gilbert filed a petition for writ of mandamus that seeks to compel the Board of Pardons and Paroles to release him immediately on mandatory supervision. This Court’s mandamus jurisdiction does not extend to the Board of Pardons and Paroles. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2017). To the extent Gilbert complains that the trial court forwarded a mandamus petition to the Court of Criminal Appeals, the proceedings at issue are purely post-conviction matters that do not implicate our mandamus jurisdiction or the mandamus jurisdiction of the district court. In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717-18 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding); see also Martinez v. Thaler, 931 S.W.2d

45, 46 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, writ denied) (“A district court has no constitutional or statutory jurisdiction to exercise supervisory control over prison officials.”). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus.

PETITION DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on October 3, 2018 Opinion Delivered October 4, 2018

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Steven Dwayne Gilbert, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

in Re Steven Dwayne Gilbert (in Re Steven Dwayne Gilbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lanier v. Stem
931 S.W.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
In Re McAfee
53 S.W.3d 715 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)