in Re Steven Dwayne Gilbert
This text of in Re Steven Dwayne Gilbert (in Re Steven Dwayne Gilbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _______________________
NO. 09-18-00372-CV _______________________
IN RE STEVEN DWAYNE GILBERT
Original Proceeding 1A District Court of Jasper County, Texas Trial Cause No. 13133JD
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Steven Dwayne Gilbert filed a petition for writ of mandamus that seeks to
compel the Board of Pardons and Paroles to release him immediately on mandatory
supervision. This Court’s mandamus jurisdiction does not extend to the Board of
Pardons and Paroles. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2017). To the
extent Gilbert complains that the trial court forwarded a mandamus petition to the
Court of Criminal Appeals, the proceedings at issue are purely post-conviction
matters that do not implicate our mandamus jurisdiction or the mandamus
jurisdiction of the district court. In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717-18 (Tex. App.—
Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding); see also Martinez v. Thaler, 931 S.W.2d
1 45, 46 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, writ denied) (“A district court has
no constitutional or statutory jurisdiction to exercise supervisory control over prison
officials.”). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus.
PETITION DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on October 3, 2018 Opinion Delivered October 4, 2018
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Steven Dwayne Gilbert, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steven-dwayne-gilbert-texapp-2018.