in Re Steven Dorman

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 12, 2010
Docket14-10-00024-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Steven Dorman (in Re Steven Dorman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Steven Dorman, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 12, 2010

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-10-00024-CV

In Re Steven Dorman, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM  OPINION

On January 11, 2010, relator, Steven Dorman, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (Vernon 2004); Tex. Elec. Code Ann. § 273.061 (Vernon 2003); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Al Bennett, presiding judge of the 164th District Court of Harris County, to set aside his January 8, 2010 injunction order directing Jared Woodfill, in his capacity as Chairman of the Harris County Republican Party, to remove relator from the list of candidates for Harris County District Clerk in the March 2, 2010 Republican Party primary. 

            On October 20, 2009, relator filed for re-election as a candidate for precinct chair.  On January 4, 2010, relator submitted a form to withdraw from the ballot as a candidate for precinct chair.  Relator then filed as a candidate for Harris County District Clerk before the filing deadline expired on January 4, 2010. 

Section 172.052 of the Texas Election Code sets the deadline for the withdrawal of a candidate for nomination from the general primary ballot not later than the 62nd day before the general primary election day.  Tex. Elec. Code Ann. § 172.052(a) (Vernon 2003).  Section 172.061(a) expressly makes section 172.052(a) applicable to a candidate for precinct chair.  Id. § 172.061(a) (Vernon 2003).  Based on the March 2, 2010 primary date, section 172.052(a) established a deadline of December 30, 2009 for relator to withdraw as a candidate for precinct chair.  Relator’s attempt to withdraw as a candidate for precinct chair on January 4, 2010 was untimely.

Section 141.033(a) prohibits a candidate from running for two offices at the same time.  Id. § 141.033(a) (Vernon 2003).  If a person files more than one application for a place on the ballot in violation of section 141.033, then the first-filed application controls and any subsequently filed applications are invalid.  Id. § 141.033(b).  Therefore, relator’s application for a place on the ballot for Harris County District Clerk for the March 2, 2010 Republican Primary is invalid. 

Relator argues that section 172.052’s deadline could lead to absurd results.  However, the role of the courts is to construe statutes as they are written.  See Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. Summers, 282 S.W.3d 433, 437 (Tex. 2009).  Therefore, we cannot rewrite the Election Code.  See Brown v. De La Cruz, 156 S.W.3d 560, 566 (Tex. 2004). 

Relator has not established his entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus.  Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

                                                                                    PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Boyce, and Sullivan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. Summers
282 S.W.3d 433 (Texas Supreme Court, 2009)
Brown v. De La Cruz
156 S.W.3d 560 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Steven Dorman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steven-dorman-texapp-2010.