in Re: Steven Bernard
This text of in Re: Steven Bernard (in Re: Steven Bernard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed March 27, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-02-01181-CV
IN RE STEVEN BERNARD, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
O P I N I O N
On November 19, 2002, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2002); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Appellant sought a writ of mandamus to require the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing on his petition for writ of mandamus filed in the trial court. On December 16, 2002, the trial court held a hearing and denied relator=s petition. Because the trial court has held a hearing and ruled on relator=s petition in the trial court, relator=s petition for writ of mandamus against the trial judge is moot.
Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Opinion filed March 27, 2003.
Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Seymore, Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Steven Bernard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steven-bernard-texapp-2003.