In re Steven A.

182 A.D.2d 1100

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Contrary to respondent’s contention, Family Court had authority to vacate, sua sponte and for good cause, the adjudication that he was a person in need of supervision (see, Family Ct Act §§ 761, 762).

There is no merit to respondent’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to prove that he was a person in need of supervision. Petitioner demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that respondent was ungovernable, habitually disobedient of the reasonable directions of his mother and stepfather, and was beyond their lawful control (see, Family Ct Act § 712 [a]). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Honan, J. — Violation of Probation.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Steven A., 182 A.D.2d 1100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

182 A.D.2d 1100 (In re Steven A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 712
New York FCT § 712
§ 761
New York FCT § 761