in Re Steve Swartzman, Andy North, and Lucy Doan
This text of in Re Steve Swartzman, Andy North, and Lucy Doan (in Re Steve Swartzman, Andy North, and Lucy Doan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 4, 2021
No. 04-21-00308-CV
IN RE Steve SWARTZMAN, Andy North, and Lucy Doan,
Original Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
On July 30, 2021, Relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may file a written response to the petition no later than August 19, 2021. Any response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.
_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of August, 2021.
___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020-CI-19151 styled Daniel Alarik v. Grunt Style, LLC, and Daniel Alarik, Individually and on behalf of Grunt Style, LLC v. Steve Swartzman, Andy North, and Lucy Doan, pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Larry Noll presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Steve Swartzman, Andy North, and Lucy Doan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steve-swartzman-andy-north-and-lucy-doan-texapp-2021.