in Re: Steve F. Smiley
This text of in Re: Steve F. Smiley (in Re: Steve F. Smiley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed November 30, 2018.
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01425-CV No. 05-18-01426-CV No. 05-18-01427-CV
IN RE STEVE F. SMILEY, Relator
Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F08-52454-H, F08-51675-H(A), and F08-51676-H(A)
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright Opinion by Justice Boatright In this original proceeding, relator complains that the trial court erroneously recommended
to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals that relator’s article 11.07 application for writ of habeas
corpus should be denied. Relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to correct the
alleged error such that the Court of Criminal Appeals can review “Ground Four A” of relator’s
habeas application.
Relator was convicted of a felony offense, and his conviction is final. Only the Texas Court
of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony proceedings. Ater v. Eighth
Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (citing TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07). This Court lacks jurisdiction over relator’s petition. Accordingly, we dismiss
this proceeding for want of jurisdiction.
/Jason Boatright/ JASON BOATRIGHT JUSTICE
181425F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Steve F. Smiley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steve-f-smiley-texapp-2018.