in Re: Steve F. Smiley

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 30, 2018·No. 05-18-01425-CV·Published

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed November 30, 2018.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01425-CV No. 05-18-01426-CV No. 05-18-01427-CV

IN RE STEVE F. SMILEY, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F08-52454-H, F08-51675-H(A), and F08-51676-H(A)

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright Opinion by Justice Boatright In this original proceeding, relator complains that the trial court erroneously recommended

to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals that relator’s article 11.07 application for writ of habeas

corpus should be denied. Relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to correct the

alleged error such that the Court of Criminal Appeals can review “Ground Four A” of relator’s

habeas application.

Relator was convicted of a felony offense, and his conviction is final. Only the Texas Court

of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony proceedings. Ater v. Eighth

Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (citing TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07). This Court lacks jurisdiction over relator’s petition. Accordingly, we dismiss

this proceeding for want of jurisdiction.

/Jason Boatright/ JASON BOATRIGHT JUSTICE

181425F.P05

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Steve F. Smiley, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

in Re: Steve F. Smiley (in Re: Steve F. Smiley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)