In re Sternstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Sternstein

668 A.2d 1082, 143 N.J. 128, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 12

DecidedJanuary 4, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 668 A.2d 1082 (In re Sternstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sternstein, 668 A.2d 1082, 143 N.J. 128, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 12 (N.J. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having on November 17, 1995, filed with the Court its decision concluding that MARILYN E. STERNSTEIN of AUDUBON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), RPC 3.2 (failure to expedite litigation) and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with the ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARILYN E. STERNSTEIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having on November 17, 1995, filed with the Court its decision concluding that MARILYN E. STERNSTEIN of AUDUBON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), RPC 3.2 (failure to expedite litigation) and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with the ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARILYN E. STERNSTEIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

668 A.2d 1082, 143 N.J. 128, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sternstein-nj-1996.