in Re: Stephen Pine

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 23, 2005·No. 13-05-00382-CV·Published

Opinion

                              NUMBER 13-05-382-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

                                         IN RE: STEPHEN PINE

                                 On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION                                   

                          Before Justices Yañez, Castillo, and Garza

                                 Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Relator, Stephen Pine, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on June 17, 2005.  Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus asks this Court to order the Respondent, the Honorable Menton Murray, Jr., Presiding Judge of the 103rd Judicial District Court of Cameron County, to vacate the June 8, 2005 order denying petitioner=s first amended motion to require execution of HIPPA compliant release form and motion to compel discovery and to issue an order granting the motion.


The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.  Accordingly,

the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered

and filed this the 23rd day of June, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Stephen Pine, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

in Re: Stephen Pine (in Re: Stephen Pine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.