in Re: Stephen Pine
This text of in Re: Stephen Pine (in Re: Stephen Pine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-05-382-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE: STEPHEN PINE
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Yañez, Castillo, and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Relator, Stephen Pine, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on June 17, 2005. Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus asks this Court to order the Respondent, the Honorable Menton Murray, Jr., Presiding Judge of the 103rd Judicial District Court of Cameron County, to vacate the June 8, 2005 order denying petitioner=s first amended motion to require execution of HIPPA compliant release form and motion to compel discovery and to issue an order granting the motion.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. Accordingly,
the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered
and filed this the 23rd day of June, 2005.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Stephen Pine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stephen-pine-texapp-2005.