in Re Stephen P. Carrigan
This text of in Re Stephen P. Carrigan (in Re Stephen P. Carrigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00053-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE STEPHEN P. CARRIGAN
On Petition for Writ of Prohibition.
ORDER Before Justices Hinojosa, Tijerina, and Silva Order Per Curiam
On February 9, 2022, relator Stephen P. Carrigan filed (1) a petition for writ of
prohibition asserting that the trial court erred by exercising jurisdiction over the underlying
case, and (2) a motion for emergency stay seeking temporary relief to stay the trial court
proceedings pending resolution of this original proceeding.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for emergency stay,
is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we order all trial court proceedings to be stayed pending further order of this Court or until this case is finally decided. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b).
The Court requests that the real parties in interest, the Commission for Lawyer
Discipline, Sharon Kaufman, and Carrigan & Anderson PLLC, or any others whose
interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for
writ of prohibition on or before the expiration of ten (10) days from the date of this order.
See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 10th day of February, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Stephen P. Carrigan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stephen-p-carrigan-texapp-2022.