in Re Stephen Kennedy
This text of in Re Stephen Kennedy (in Re Stephen Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 7, 2016
No. 04-16-00173-CV
IN RE Stephen KENNEDY, H.L. Polinard, Irene Polinard, Matthew Reynolds, and William Malcomson
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice
On March 29, 2016, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary orders pending a ruling on the mandamus petition. The court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary orders are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on April 7, 2016.
_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of April, 2016.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015-CI-10692, styled Woodlawn Christian Church of San Antonio, Inc. v. James Paul Tisdel Jr., Carolyn Tisdel and George Alejos, pending in the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Karen H. Pozza presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Stephen Kennedy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stephen-kennedy-texapp-2016.