in Re Stephen Dawson
This text of in Re Stephen Dawson (in Re Stephen Dawson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-15-00022-CV _________________
IN RE STEPHEN DAWSON
________________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding ________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Stephen Dawson filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the
visiting judge presiding in the 410th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas,
to vacate a final arbitration award in favor of Wells Fargo Bank National
Association, to issue a new ruling that includes conclusions of law concerning
Dawson’s petition to vacate the arbitration award, and to sign a new final judgment
without handwritten interlineations. Dawson claims he does not have an adequate
remedy at law by appeal because “it is not clear which party he should appeal the
award against when the judicial system is not making a distinction between Wells
1 Fargo N.A. (the entity Dawson arbitrated against) and Wells Fargo, National
Association (the entity Dawson contracted with); two different entities.”
After carefully reviewing the mandamus petition and record, we conclude
that the relator failed to establish that he lacks an adequate remedy by appeal.1 See
generally In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 136 (Tex. 2004); Tex.
Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 171.098(a)(3) (West 2011). Accordingly, we deny
the petition for writ of mandamus.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on January 21, 2015 Opinion Delivered January 22, 2015
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
1 Generally, an appeal from a final judgment must be taken within thirty days of the date the judgment is signed by filing a notice of appeal with the trial court. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1, 26.1. The record for an appeal differs from a mandamus record. Compare Tex. R. App. P. 34 with Tex. R. App. P. 52.7. In an appropriate circumstance, an extension of time to file a notice of appeal may be granted to an appellant who attempted to invoke the appellate jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals within fifteen days of the deadline. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Stephen Dawson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stephen-dawson-texapp-2015.