in Re Stephen D. Fox
This text of in Re Stephen D. Fox (in Re Stephen D. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 23, 2012.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-12-00439-CV ____________
IN RE STEPHEN D. FOX, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 257th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009-54595
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 8, 2012, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asked this court to compel the Honorable Judy Warne, presiding judge of the 257th District Court of Harris County, and the Honorable Olen Underwood to comply with Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a. Relator also filed an emergency motion to stay proceedings in the trial court. That motion was denied. Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. He has failed to file a record to support his petition. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jamison.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Stephen D. Fox, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stephen-d-fox-texapp-2012.