In re Stephen B.
195 A.D.2d 1065, 601 N.Y.S.2d 897
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Stephen B.. Read the opinion of the Court — 176 A.D.2d 1204 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 16, 1993·No. Appeal No. 1·Published
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court. We add only that great deference must be given to the court’s finding that the testimony of respondent’s experts was more credible than that of petitioner’s experts (see, Matter of Lynelle W., 177 AD2d 1008; Matter of Miranda UU., 168 AD2d 704). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Manz, J.—Dismiss Petition.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Boomer, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Stephen B., 195 A.D.2d 1065, 601 N.Y.S.2d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).
195 A.D.2d 1065 (In re Stephen B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Miranda UU.
168 A.D.2d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
In re Lynelle W.
177 A.D.2d 1008 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)