In re Stephen B.
This text of 195 A.D.2d 1065 (In re Stephen B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court should have conducted a reconstruction hearing as requested by respondent to determine whether there was a portion of the record that should have been recorded and transcribed. Nevertheless, respondent suffered no prejudice thereby because the record as submitted is sufficient for this Court to determine that the petition was properly dismissed (see, Matter of Stephen B., 195 AD2d 1065 [decided herewith]; see also, CPLR 2001, 2002). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Townsend, J.—Settle Record.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Boomer, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 A.D.2d 1065, 601 N.Y.S.2d 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stephen-b-nyappdiv-1993.