in Re Stephanie Rios

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: September 4, 2015
• Docket: 04-15-00557-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 04-15-00557-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/4/2015 7:00:05 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK

04-15-00557-CV No. ______________ FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/4/2015 7:00:05 PM IN THE COURT OF APPEALS KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

In Re Stephanie Rios, Relator

Original Proceedings from the County Court at Law, Sitting as a Probate Court, Starr County, Texas The Honorable Romero Molina Presiding From Cause No. PR-14-016

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Followed by an Emergency Motion to Abate & Preserve Docket Control Order

Flor E. Flores THE LAW FIRM OF FLOR E. FLORES, PLLC 700 N. Flores St., Ste. E Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 Tel: (956)263-1786 Fax: (956)263-1750 Email: ffloreslaw@gmail.com

Attorney for Stephanie Rios, Relator

1 IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL

PARTIES COUNSEL

Relator:

Stephanie Rios Flor E. Flores THE LAW FIRM OF FLOR E. FLORES, PLLC 700 N. Flores St., Ste. E Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 Tel: (956)263-1786 Fax: (956)263-1750 Email: ffloreslaw@gmail.com

Respondent:

County Court at Law, sitting as a Probate Court, Starr County, Texas Honorable Romero Molina

Real Parties In Interest:

Maria Adriana Flores Gilberto Falcon THE LAW OFFICE OF GILBERTO FALCON, PLLC 320 Lindberg Ave. McAllen, Texas 78501 Email: gilberto@gilbertofalconlaw.com

Roel “Robie” Flores FLORES ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3331 N. Ware Rd. McAllen, Texas 78501 Email: robieflores@att.net

Attorney Ad Litem:

Minerva Garza LAW OFFICE OF BALDEMAR GARZA AND MINERVA GARZA, PLLC 200 East Second Street Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 Email: garzalawoffice@aol.com

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Identity of Parties and Counsel…………………………………………………..…2

Index of Authorities……………………………………………………………...4, 5

Statement of Jurisdiction …………………………………………………………..6

Statement of the Case……………………………………………………………7, 8

Issues Presented…………………………………………………………………….9 A. Did the trial court clearly abuse its discretion when it granted a continuance of the trial, over Relator’s written and oral objections, when Real Party in Interest failed to show good cause? …………………………………….19-21

B. Did the trial court clearly abuse its discretion in granting a trial continuance, over Relator’s written and oral objections, to allow Real Party in Interest to conduct discovery outside the deadlines imposed by the Agreed Docket Control Order, when Real Party in Interest failed to show that she exercised due diligence in utilizing the procedures for discovery afforded by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure?.........................................................................20-25

C. Did the trial court clearly abuse its discretion when it granted a continuance of the trial, over Relator’s written and oral objections, to allow Real Party in Interest to conduct discovery outside of the deadlines imposed by the Docket Control Order?..........................................................................................26-28

Statement of Facts……………………………………………………………..10-14

Argument & Authorities……………………………………………………….15-28

Conclusion……………………………………………………………………..29-31

Prayer………………………………………………………………………….32-33

Certificate of Compliance………………………………………………………...34

Certificate of Service……………………………………………………………...35

Appendix………………………………………………………………………36-37

3 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

Case Law Pages

Coker v. Coker, 650 S.W.2d 391, 393 (Tex. 1983)……………………….15, 18, 26

CSR Ltd. v. Link, 925 S.W.2d 591, 596 (Tex. 1966)……………………………...15

Fritsch v. J.M. English Truck Line, Inc., 151 Tex. 168 (Tex. 1952)...........16, 17, 20

Gabaldon v. General Motors Corp., 876 S.W.2d 367, 370 (Tex.App.—El Paso, 1993…………………………………………………24

Gen. Motors Corp. v. Gayle, 951 S.W.2d 469, 477 (Tex. 1997)…………………16

In re Ford Motor Co., 988 S.W.2d 714, 721 (Tex. 1998)………………………...16

In re H & R Block, 159 S.W.3d 127, 132 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi 2004)……...16

In re Luna, 12-07-00185-CV (Tex.App.—Tyler, 2007)……………...16, 19, 21, 22

In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 13536 (Tex. 2004) …………………15

In re Van Waters & Rogers, Inc., 145 S.W.3d 203, 210-11 (Tex.2004)……….....16

Johnson v. Fourth Court of Appeals, 700 S.W.2d 916, 917 (Tex. 1985)…………15

Lopez v. Munoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P., 22 S.W.3d 857, 861 (Tex. 2000)..18, 26

MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Texas Utilities Elec. Co., 995 S.W.2d 647, 650-51 (Tex. 1999)………………………………………26

Nat’l Union Fire Ins., Co. v. CBI Indus., Inc., 907 S.W.2d 517, 520 (Tex. 1995)………………………………………………………...18, 26

Sanchez v. Duke Energy Field Services, Inc., No. 04-05-00926-CV, 2006 WL 2546365, at 2 (Tex.App.—San Antonio Sept. 6, 2006)…………………………...18, 26, 27

State v. Crank, 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex. 1984)……………………………….16, 20

4 State v. Wood Oil Distrib., Inc., 751 S.W.2d 863 (1988)…………16, 17, 20, 21, 25

Villegas v. Carter, 171 S.W.2d 624, 626 (Tex. 1986)………………………...16, 20

Verkin v. SW Cent 1, 784 S.W.2d 92 (Tex. App. 1990)…………………………..23

Wagner & Brown v. E.W. Moran Drilling Co., 702 S.W.2d 760, 769 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1986……………………………………...18, 26

Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992)……………………………..15

Statutes Pages

Tex. R. Civ. P. 247……………………………………………………17, 19, 24, 27

Tex. R. Civ. P. 251………………………………………………………..17, 19, 27

Tex. R. Civ. P. 252………………………………………………..17, 20, 21, 23, 24

5 STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION

This court has jurisdiction over this petition for writ of mandamus under

Section 22.201 and 22.221(b) of the Texas Government Code.

6 STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The underlying case involves an Application to Appoint Dependent

Administrator of the Estate of Artemio Rios, deceased, and an Application to

Determine the Heirs of Artemio Rios, deceased. Both applications were filed by

Stephanie Rios, Relator and the biological daughter of Artemio Rios.

The cases originated in the County Court at Law, sitting as a Probate Court,

of Rio Grande City, Starr County, Texas, in Cause No. PR-14-13 and Cause No PR-

14-16, both styled In the Estate of Artemio Rios, deceased.

Real Party in Interest Maria Adriana Flores filed a Petition for Intervention

for Determination of the Right of Inheritance on March 4, 2015, alleging to be the

common law wife of Artemio Rios, deceased. Relator disputes that a common law

marriage between her father and Real Party in Interest existed. Relator filed a

Demand for a Jury Trial solely on the issue of whether a common law marriage

existed between Real Party in Interest and Decedent. A Special Jury Trial was

scheduled for September 3, 2015.

Real Party in Interest filed a Motion for Continuance of the Trial on

September 1, 2015, on the ground that she had not yet had an opportunity to depose

Relator, her biological brother and heir to Artemio Rios, and a non-party. Relator

objected to those depositions on the ground that the discovery deadlines imposed by

the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, incorporated into the Agreed Docket Control

7 Order had expired and objected to the trial continuance by way of argument at the

hearing held on September 1, 2015 and the written Response and Objection to the

Motion for Continuance incorporated by reference into the oral argument. The trial

court granted a continuance of the trial, without a showing of good cause and due

diligence, and after several resets at the request of Real Party in Interest over

Relator’s objections.

Relator complains that Respondent clearly abused its discretion in granting a

trial continuance to allow Real Party in Interest to conduct discovery after the

expiration of the discovery deadline and disregarding the Agreed Docket Control

Order. Relator further complains that Respondent clearly abused its discretion in

opening the discovery period two (2) days before the scheduled trial date to allow

Real Party in Interest to take depositions of witnesses when Real Party in Interest

completely failed to exercise due diligence in conducting discovery during the

discovery period, in contravention to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and the

Agreed Docket Control Order.

8 ISSUES PRESENTED

A. Did the trial court clearly abuse its discretion when it granted a continuance of the trial, over Relator’s written and oral objections, when Real Party in Interest failed to show good cause?

B. Did the trial court clearly abuse its discretion in granting a trial continuance, over Relator’s written and oral objections, to allow Real Party in Interest to conduct discovery outside the deadlines imposed by the Agreed Docket Control Order, when Real Party in Interest failed to show that she exercised due diligence in utilizing the procedures for discovery afforded by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure?

C. Did the trial court clearly abuse its discretion when it granted a continuance of the trial, over Relator’s written and oral objections, to allow Real Party in Interest to conduct discovery outside of the deadlines imposed by the Docket Control Order?

9 STATEMENT OF FACTS

Relator Stephanie Rios was the biological daughter of Artemio Rios,

deceased. Artemio Rios died as a result of an automobile accident on November 30,

2013. Relator filed a wrongful death suit in Cause No. DC-13-971 in the 381st

Judicial District Court, Rio Grande City, Starr County, Texas. Relator subsequently

also filed an Application for Appointment of Dependent Administrator under Cause

No. PR-14-13 in the County Court at Law, sitting as a Probate Court, Rio Grande

City, Starr County, Texas. [Apx. 1]. Relator also filed an Application to Determine

Heirship in Cause No. PR-14-16 in the County Court at Law, sitting as a Probate

Court, Rio Grande City, Starr County, Texas. [Apx. 2]. Relator’s wrongful death

suit is set for Trial on October 19, 2015. [Apx. 3].

Real Party in Interest Maria Adriana Flores filed a Petition in Intervention for

Determination of the Right of Inheritance on or about March 4, 2015, claiming to be

the common law wife of Artemio Rios, deceased. [Apx. 4]

Since the Intervention was filed, both cases were set for hearings on Relator’s

pending applications and at every hearing set, Real Party in Interest requested a reset

by way of oral motions for continuances of the hearings. Relator objected to every

reset of the case and the trial court nonetheless granted each request for a

continuance. The trial court set the case for a hearing on all pending

applications/motions for March 26, 2015. Again, Real Party in Interest requested a

10 reset, and again, over Relator’s objections, the trial court granted the reset and

ordered the parties to enter into a docket control order and set the case for trial.

Relator filed a Motion to Compel Discovery and after a hearing, Real Party in

Interest was ordered to respond to Relator’s discovery by July 30, 2015. [Apx. 5].

Relator attempted to prepare a Docket Control Order, sent Real Party in Interest’s

attorney an email requesting tentative trial dates, and counsel never responded.

[Apx. 6] Relator filed a Motion for Docket Control Order on June 11, 2015 and said

motion was set for a hearing on July 23, 2015. [Apx. 7] On the same date, the

parties entered into an Agreed Docket Control Order, which was signed by the Court

on the same date. [Apx. 8] Said Agreed Docket Control Order set all the deadlines,

including deadlines to complete discovery, as per the Texas Rules of Civil

Procedure.

Relator took depositions of Real Party in Interest and three witnesses

disclosed in Real Party in Interest’s response to Relator’s discovery. [Apx. 9] These

witnesses were disclosed late and only after the filing of a Motion to Compel. The

depositions of the Real Party in Interest and her witnesses were set for July 31, 2015

by agreement of the parties and later moved to August 4, 2015 at Real Party in

Interest’s request. Said depositions were noticed after the discovery deadline by

agreement of the parties, as allowed by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and due

to Real Party in Interest’s failure to timely disclose in response to discovery requests.

11 Real Party in Interest for the first time attempted to engage in discovery and

sent Relator’s counsel a letter with tentative deposition dates on August 6, 2015,

after the expiration of the discovery deadlines as per the Agreed Docket Control

Order. [Apx. 10]. Real Party in Interest, however, attempted to set those depositions

in the wrongful death case filed by Relator individually and on behalf of the Estate

of Artemio Rios, her deceased father, and filed in Cause No. DC-13-971 in the 381st

Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas. Id. Real Party in Interest also filed an

intervention in that case. Defendant in Cause No. DC-13-971 filed a Motion to

Quash and for Protective Order on the ground that the depositions of the parties

noticed by Real Party in Interest had already been taken. [Apx. 11]. Real Party in

Interest was notified, and in that case also, failed to exercise due diligence and failed

to participate in those depositions. Moreover, Real Party in Interest’s intervention

had also already been stricken at the time she noticed depositions of the parties.

[Apx. 12]. Real Party in Interest incorrectly claimed in her argument on the

continuance of the trial in this case that Relator not only failed to cooperate in

scheduling depositions, that said depositions were noticed unilaterally because of

Relator’s failure to cooperate, and that Relator filed an untimely Motion to Quash

and for Protective Order. Relator denies those allegations as evidenced by the

documents attached in Appendix 8 – 11 and in fact, never filed a Motion to Quash

and for Protective Order.

12 Real Party in Interest again sent another correspondence attempting to notice

depositions in Cause No. DC-13-971. [Apx. 13]. Real Party in Interest noticed

depositions for August 25, 2015 and Relator filed a timely Motion to Quash and for

Protective Order on the ground that the depositions were noticed after expiration of

the discovery deadlines as per the Docket Control Order, that Real Party in Interest

failed to comply with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure in noticing the deposition

of a non-party, and that Real Party in Interest failed to comply with the Texas Rules

of Civil Procedure in failing to properly schedule depositions in Cause No. PR-14-

16. [Apx. 14]. Real Party in Interest filed Amended Notices of Intent to Depose on

August 31, 2015 and Relator again filed a second timely Motion to Quash and for

Protective Order on the same grounds. [Apx. 15].

Real Party in Interest filed a Motion for Continuance of the Trial on August

30, 2015, alleging that she had not had an opportunity to depose witnesses. [Apx.

16]. Relator timely filed a Response and Objection to the Motion for Continuance

on August 31, 2015. [Apx. 17, 17-A through 17-K]. The trial court set the case for

a hearing on Real Party in Interest’s motion for continuance for September 1, 2015.

At that hearing, Real Party in Interest urges a trial continuance to allow her to depose

Relator and her witnesses and further claims that Relator could not quash the

depositions the motions to quash required a five (5) day notice of a hearing on said

motions had been filed less than five (5) days of the September 1, 2015 hearing.

13 Real Party in Interest fails to point out that her untimely request to depose witnesses

days before the trial necessitated the filing of said motions to quash. Real Party in

Interest also fails to point out that she was attempting to schedule depositions after

the expiration of the discovery period as per the Agreed Docket Control Order.

More significantly, Real Party in Interest fails to point out that during the six

(6) months period since her intervention was filed, she completely failed to exercise

due diligence in scheduling deposition or conducting any discovery whatsoever,

even though she requested several resets of this case. In addition, when Real Party

in Interest, through her counsel, entered into the Agreed Docket Control Order, she

was well aware that a Demand for Jury Trial had been made and filed by Relator and

that Relator had made at least two attempts to set the matter for trial. After two

docket control order hearings, a trial date was secured by agreement of all parties.

14 ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that is available only in limited

circumstances. CSR Ltd. v. Link, 925 S.W.2d 591, 596 (Tex. 1966) (orig.

proceedings) (citing Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992) (orig.

proceedings)). Mandamus is appropriate “only to correct a clear abuse of discretion

or the violation of a duty imposed by law when there is no other adequate remedy

by law.” Id. “In order to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the

trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate

remedy.” In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 13536 (Tex. 2004); Walker,

827 S.W.2d at 83940.

“A trial court abuses its discretion if it reaches a decision ‘so arbitrary and

unreasonable as to amount to clear and prejudicial error of law.’” Walker v. Packer,

827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (quoting Johnson v. Fourth Court of Appeals, 700 S.W.2d 916,

917 (Tex. 1985). “Appellate courts will not intervene to control incidental trial court

rulings when an adequate remedy by appeal exists.” In re Prudential Ins. Co. of

Am.,148 S.W.3d 124, 136 (Tex. 2004)(orig. proceeding); Walker, 827 S.W.2d at

840. “But a party will not have an adequate remedy by appeal (1) when the appellate

court would not be able to cure the trial court's discovery error, (2) when the party's

ability to present a viable claim or defense at trial is vitiated or severely

compromised by the trial court's discovery error, or (3) when the trial court disallows

15 discovery and the missing discovery cannot be made a part of the appellate record

or the trial court, after proper request, refuses to make it part of the record.” In re

Van Waters & Rogers, Inc., 145 S.W.3d 203, 210-11 (Tex.2004) (orig.

proceeding); In re Ford Motor Co., 988 S.W.2d 714, 721 (Tex. 1998) (orig.

proceeding); Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 843.

The denial of a motion for continuance is an incidental trial ruling ordinarily

not reviewable by mandamus. Gen. Motors Corp. v. Gayle, 951 S.W.2d 469, 477

(Tex. 1997). An exception to this general rule occurs when special circumstances

are present. Id. Special circumstances are present when other errors exist that are

themselves properly reviewed on petition for writ of mandamus. Id.; In re H & R

Block, 159 S.W.3d 127, 132 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi 2004, orig. proceeding

[mand. dismissed]); In re Luna, 12-07-00185-CV (Tex.App.—Tyler, 2007).

“It is well established that the granting or denial of a motion for continuance

is within the trial court’s sound discretion.” State v. Wood Oil Distrib., Inc., 751

S.W.2d 863 (1988) (citing Villegas v. Carter, 171 S.W.2d 624, 626 (Tex. 1986));

State v. Crank, 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex. 1984). “The exercise of discretion will not

be disturbed on appeal unless the record discloses a clear abuse of discretion.” Id.

“It is also well established that the failure of a litigant to diligently utilize the rules

of civil procedure for discovery purposes will not authorize the granting of a

continuance.” Fritsch v. J.M. English Truck Line, Inc., 151 Tex. 168 (Tex. 1952).

16 “A trial court will not be required to grant a motion for continuance, at the risk of

committing error in overruling it, when the allegations in the motion examined in

light of the record show beyond cavil a complete lack of diligence…” Id. at 858.

“A party who does not diligently utilize the procedures for discovery can seldom

claim reversible error when the trial court refuses a continuance.” State v. Wood Oil

Distributing, Inc., 751 S.W.2d 863, 865 (Tex. 1988).

Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 247 further states that “[n]o cause which has

been set upon the trial docket of the court shall be taken from the trial docket for the

date set except by agreement of the parties or for good cause upon motion and notice

to the opposing party.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 247; Tex. R. Civ. P. 251. The rules further

state that “[t]he failure to obtain the deposition of any witness residing within 100

miles of the courthouse or the county in which the suit is pending shall not be

regarded as want of diligence when diligence has been used to secure the personal

attendance of such witness under the rules of law….” Tex. R. Civ. P. 252. Rule 252

further requires that “if a continuance is sought to depose a witness, the motion must

include the following information: 1.) the witness’s name and address (street,

county, and state of residence); and 2.) a description of the testimony the witness

will probably give and what the party expects the testimony to prove. Id.

Agreed docket control orders are governed by contract principles. “When a

contract is not ambiguous, the construction of the written instrument is a question of

17 law for the court that is reviewed de novo.” MCI Telecommunications Corp. v.

Texas Utilities Elec. Co., 995 S.W.2d 647, 650-51 (Tex. 1999); Coker v. Coker, 650

S.W.2d 391, 393 (Tex. 1983). “Whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of

law that must be decided by examining the contract as a whole in light of the

circumstances present when the contract was entered.” Nat’l Union Fire Ins., Co. v.

CBI Indus., Inc., 907 S.W.2d 517, 520 (Tex. 1995); Sanchez v. Duke Energy Field

Services, Inc., No. 04-05-00926-CV, 2006 WL 2546365, at 2 (Tex.App.—San

Antonio Sept. 6, 2006, pet. denied); see also Wagner & Brown v. E.W. Moran

Drilling Co., 702 S.W.2d 760, 769 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1986, no writ)(court

must determine from expressions used in a written contract whether there has been

a meeting of the minds). “If a written contract is worded so that it can be given a

definite or certain legal meaning, then it is unambiguous.” Nat’l Union Fire Ins.

Co., 907 S.W.2d at 520; Coker, 650 S.W.2d at 393. “An ambiguity does not arise

simply because the parties offer forceful and diametrically opposing interpretations.”

Lopez v. Munoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P., 22 S.W.3d 857, 861 (Tex. 2000);

Sanchez, 2006 WL 2546365 at 2. “Rather, a contract is ambiguous only if two or

more reasonable interpretations are genuinely possible after application of the

pertinent rules of interpretation to the face of the instrument.” Sanchez, 2006 WL

2546365 at 2.

18 I. Real Party in Interest Failed to Show Good Cause

“A continuance shall not be granted except for sufficient cause supported by

affidavit, or by consent of the parties, or by operation of law.” In Re Luna, 12-07-

00185-CV (Tex.App.—Tyler, 2007). Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 247 further

states that “[n]o cause which has been set upon the trial docket of the court shall be

taken from the trial docket for the date set except by agreement of the parties or for

good cause upon motion and notice to the opposing party.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 247; Tex.

R. Civ. P. 251.

Relator contends that Real Party in Interest’s motion for continuance and her

argument at the hearing on said motion are devoid of any showing of good cause. In

her motion, Real Party in Interest simply states that “counsel has previously noticed

the opposing parties in this case, and they improperly quashed the depositions…”

The verified affidavit attached to her motion for continuance is also devoid of any

reason, justification or ground which constitutes good cause for the granting of a

continuance. What Real Party in Interest fails to state in her motion is that she was

attempting to schedule depositions just days before the scheduled trial and past the

expiration of the discovery deadlines as per the Agreed Docket Control Order.

Absent an agreement between the parties to allow for depositions past the expiration

of discovery deadlines, Real Party in Interest was required to show good cause for a

continuance, which she failed to do. Relator further contends that Real Party in

19 Interest could not show good cause for the granting of a continuance when Real

Party in Interest had already unreasonably delayed the proceedings by requesting

resets over Relator’s objections, all of which were granted by the trial court, also

absent good cause.

II. Real Party in Interest Failed to Exercise Due Diligence

“It is well established that the granting or denial of a motion for continuance

is within the trial court’s sound discretion.” State v. Wood Oil Distrib., Inc., 751

S.W.2d 863 (1988) (citing Villegas v. Carter, 171 S.W.2d 624, 626 (Tex. 1986));

State v. Crank, 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex. 1984). “The exercise of discretion will not

be disturbed on appeal unless the record discloses a clear abuse of discretion.” Id.

“A trial court will not be required to grant a motion for continuance, at the

risk of committing error in overruling it, when the allegations in the motion

examined in light of the record show beyond cavil a complete lack of diligence…”

Id. at 858. “A party who does not diligently utilize the procedures for discovery can

seldom claim reversible error when the trial court refuses a continuance.” State v.

Wood Oil Distributing, Inc., 751 S.W.2d 863, 865 (Tex. 1988).

“The failure to obtain the deposition of any witness residing within 100 miles

of the courthouse or the county in which the suit is pending shall not be regarded as

want of diligence when diligence has been used to secure the personal attendance

of such witness under the rules of law….” Tex. R. Civ. P. 252. Rule 252 further

20 requires that “if a continuance is sought to depose a witness, the motion must include

the following information: 1.) the witness’s name and address (street, county, and

state of residence); and 2.) a description of the testimony the witness will probably

give and what the party expects the testimony to prove. Id.

In Wood, Wood asked for a continuance “[o]n the morning of the trial…to

obtain additional time to take depositions of the State’s witnesses….” State v. Wood

Oil Distrib., Inc., 751 S.W.2d 863 (Tex. 1988). “Wood also sought the continuance

in order to discovery more detailed information from the State….” Id. Wood had

not conducted discovery during the two years in which suit was pending. Id. The

Supreme Court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion because Wood

did not prove diligence. Id. The Court said that Wood’s inability…to take the

deposition of State’s witnesses was ‘a predicament of its own making.’ Id. The

Court further stated “that is a risk Wood took by not diligently pursuing discovery.”

Id. “To reward such conduct with a new trial is manifestly improper.” Id.

Moreover, in Luna, a trial was scheduled for May 21, 2007 by Agreed Docket

Control Order. In Re Luna, 12-07-00185-CV (Tex.App—Tyler, 2007). On May 4,

2007, Luna filed a motion for continuance of the trial “requesting that the trial be

continued for sixty days because she needed additional time…to obtain deposition

testimony...to obtain precise details concerning the nature, depth, and breadth of the

operational agreement in effect at the time of this incident….” Id. A hearing was

21 held on May 15, 2007, and the trial court denied said motion. Id. Luna [sought]

“’mandamus relief from the respondent trial court’s denial of her motion for

continuance’….[and] ‘also filed a motion for an emergency stay of all proceedings

pending…disposition of her petition.’” Id. The Court denied mandamus relief and

held that “the record does not affirmatively show the diligence necessary for Luna

to obtain a continuance to conduct additional discovery.” Id.

Realtor contends that Real Party in Interest has failed to show any exercise of

due diligence on her part to engage in discovery. Real Party in Interest’s motion for

continuance fails to emphasize that she failed to engage in any discovery during the

pendency of the suit and that on the eve of trial, she attempts to take depositions after

expiration of the discovery deadlines. Like in Luna, Real Party in Interest has failed

to show due diligence in utilizing the discovery procedures afforded to all parties by

the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Moreover, also like in Luna, Relator contends

that the record in this case does not affirmatively show the diligence necessary for

Real Party in Interest to obtain a continuance to conduct additional discovery.

Additionally, Relator contends that Real Party in Interest’s motion for

continuance should have been denied because in addition to failing to show good

cause and due diligence, her motion for continuance is not in substantial compliance

with Rule 252, which requires that “when requesting additional time for discovery,

a party must fulfill six requirements under oath: 1.) the testimony is material; 2.)

22 proof of materiality; 3.) show of diligence; 4.) cause of failure, if known; 5.)

evidence not available; 6.) continuance is not for delay only but so that justice be

done. Tex. R. Civ. P. 252; Verkin v. SW Cent 1, 784 S.W.2d 92 (Tex. App. 1990).

Real Party in Interest counsel filed a motion for continuance and attached an affidavit

to said motion. In his affidavit, Real Party in Interest’s counsel simply states “I am

hereby acquainted with the facts stated in the Motion for Continuance.” The motion

itself states that “counsel has previously noticed the opposing parties in this case,

and they improperly quashed the depositions…” It further states that “depositions

are scheduled for September 1, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.; 10:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m.” Relator

filed a written response and objection to Real Party in Interest’s motion for

continuance, and incorporated written arguments into oral arguments at the hearing

on said motion, controverting the statements in the motion and objecting to its non-

compliance with the rules. Relator contends that Real Party in Interest failed to

comply with Rule 252 in that she has completely failed to show that she exercised

due diligence in trying to obtaining depositions and conduct any discovery within

the six (6) months that her intervention had been pending; has failed to completely

state a cause for her failure to do so; has failed to show that evidence was not

available during that time; and has failed to show how her request for a continuance

is for anything other than to delay the case, an impermissible attempt to obtain

evidence and conduct discovery past the discovery deadlines, and cause prejudice to

23 Relator. Real Party in Interest has further failed to state in her motion for

continuance “the type of information sought” in the depositions she attempts to

notice. Gabaldon v. General Motors Corp., 876 S.W.2d 367, 370 (Tex.App.—El

Paso, 1993, no writ). In fact, Real Party in Interest’s motion for continuance is

devoid of any of the information required by Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 252.

The strict requirements of Rule 252 clearly state that ‘if a continuance is sought to

depose a witness, the motion must include…’ the above stated requirements. Tex.

R. Civ. P. 252. The language in Rule 252 is mandatory, and Real Party in Interest’s

motion for continuance does not satisfy those mandatory requirements. Most

importantly, Real Party in Interest’s motion for continuance also fails to state that

the discovery period had expired at the time she attempted to schedule depositions.

Real Party in Interest’s motion for continuance is devoid of any showing of

due diligence in procuring depositions of witnesses in this case. In fact, Real Party

in Interest has failed to satisfy the requirement and describe the attempts she has

made in a period of six (6) months to secure discovery of evidence. Rule 247 further

imposes mandatory language when a party moves for a trial continuance to conduct

discovery. Rule 247 specifically requires that Real Party in Interest show good cause

and due diligence, none of which Real Party in Interest showed in her motion for

continuance or argument at the hearing on said motion. Real Party in Interest’s only

argument in her attempt to show good cause was that she had not taken depositions

24 yet. However, Real Party in Interest failed to emphasize that her attempts to depose

witnesses were all made after the expiration of the discovery deadlines. Real Party

in Interests attempts to show due diligence was to produce correspondence and

emails showing her attempts to notice depositions, but Real Party in interest also

failed to emphasize that the correspondence and email sent were for attempts to

schedule depositions in a case not before the Probate Court, and most importantly,

also beyond the Docket Control Order and the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure

deadlines. Real Party in Interest attempts to show good cause and due diligence

in scheduling depositions within a week from the scheduled Trial. Real Party in

Interest’s failure to conduct discovery and take depositions was not the result of

accident or mistake, but rather the result of conscious indifference. Relator has no

adequate remedy at law because the trial court’s order opening discovery two (2)

days before the scheduled trial and clearly way past the expiration of the discovery

deadlines now subject Relator and her witnesses that Real Party in Interest could

have taken during the six-month period from the filing of the petition in intervention

to the date of trial. “A party who does not diligently utilize the procedures for

discovery can seldom claim reversible error when the trial court refuses a

continuance.” State v. Wood Oil Distributing, Inc., 751 S.W.2d 863, 865 (Tex.

1988).

25 III. Agreed Docket Control Order

Agreed docket control orders are governed by contract principles. “When a

contract is not ambiguous, the construction of the written instrument is a question of

law for the court that is reviewed de novo.” MCI Telecommunications Corp. v.

Texas Utilities Elec. Co., 995 S.W.2d 647, 650-51 (Tex. 1999); Coker v. Coker, 650

S.W.2d 391, 393 (Tex. 1983). “Whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of

law that must be decided by examining the contract as a whole in light of the

circumstances present when the contract was entered.” Nat’l Union Fire Ins., Co. v.

CBI Indus., Inc., 907 S.W.2d 517, 520 (Tex. 1995); Sanchez v. Duke Energy Field

Services, Inc., No. 04-05-00926-CV, 2006 WL 2546365, at 2 (Tex.App.—San

Antonio Sept. 6, 2006, pet. denied); see also Wagner & Brown v. E.W. Moran

Drilling Co., 702 S.W.2d 760, 769 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1986, no writ)(court

must determine from expressions used in a written contract whether there has been

a meeting of the minds). “If a written contract is worded so that it can be given a

definite or certain legal meaning, then it is unambiguous.” Nat’l Union Fire Ins.

Co., 907 S.W.2d at 520; Coker, 650 S.W.2d at 393. “An ambiguity does not arise

simply because the parties offer forceful and diametrically opposing interpretations.”

Lopez v. Munoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P., 22 S.W.3d 857, 861 (Tex. 2000);

Sanchez, 2006 WL 2546365 at 2. “Rather, a contract is ambiguous only if two or

more reasonable interpretations are genuinely possible after application of the

26 pertinent rules of interpretation to the face of the instrument.” Sanchez, 2006 WL

Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 247 further states that “[n]o cause which has

been set upon the trial docket of the court shall be taken from the trial docket for the

date set except by agreement of the parties or for good cause upon motion and notice

to the opposing party.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 247; Tex. R. Civ. P. 251.

Real Party in Interest filed her Petition in Intervention six (6) months prior to

the date of the scheduled Trial. Real Party in Interest joined in the Agreed Docket

Control Order setting the case for Trial on September 3, 2015. It is significant to

emphasize that the Agreed Docket Control Order was entered into after the second

request for a docket control order by Relator. Approximately two (2) months passed

between the first hearing on Relator’s Motion for Docket Control Order and the

second. During that period of time, Real Party in Interest failed to engage in

absolutely any discovery. On July 23, 2015, the Agreed Docket Control Order was

executed by all parties and signed by the Court. During the period of time between

the filing of the intervention and the trial, Real Party in Interest failed to conduct any

discovery. On the eve of trial, Real Party in Interest attempted to notice depositions,

after the discovery deadlines have passed, and without proving any due diligence in

attempting to conduct discovery or procure depositions of the witnesses.

27 Relator contends that principles of contract apply to the Agreed Docket

Control Order executed between the parties. That agreement clearly states that all

deadlines, including the deadline to complete discovery, were set as per the Texas

Rules of Civil Procedure. The Texas Rules are very clear that discovery begins on

the date the suit is filed up to thirty (30) days before trial. There is no ambiguity in

the Agreed Docket Control Order executed between the parties and no reason for the

agreement of the parties to be undone by the trial court or Real Party in Interest. The

trial court provided no justification for undoing the agreement of the parties and

opening the discovery deadline to allow Real Party in Interest to take depositions

just days before the scheduled trial, especially when the agreement governs the

deadlines in this case. Relator contends that the trial court clearly abused its

discretion in opening the discovery deadlines in contravention to valid Agreed

Docket Control Order and further in rewarding Real Party in Interest with the

opportunity to take depositions after expiration of the discovery deadlines, when

Real Party in Interest failed to show good cause and due diligence. The trial court’s

actions in ignoring the docket control order are in contravention with the rules of

law and applicable case law, and constituted a clear abuse of discretion.

28 CONCLUSION

The trial record is clear that Real Party in Interest intervened in the probate

matters and did absolutely nothing after the intervention. Real Party in Interest

claims to have been the common law wife of Artemio Rios, decedent, and not only

has she failed to produce any evidence or substantial witnesses to support her claim,

but has also engaged in zero discovery. Real Party in Interest, during the six-months

period she has been in this litigation, has done nothing other than request reset after

reset, and after agreeing to a trial date, files a Motion for Continuance of the trial

just five (5) days before the trial is set to begin, claiming she hasn’t had the

“opportunity” to depose Relator and some of her witness. It was not Real Party in

Interests lack of opportunity to depose, but an absolute lack of due diligence on her

party. The Texas Rules are very clear that discovery begins on the date the suit is

filed up to thirty (30) days before trial. On the eve of trial, Real Party in Interest

tries to come up with some evidence, through depositions, to prove her claim. With

the assistance of the trial court, Real Party in Interest was given yet another

opportunity to do the work she should have done during the discovery period. Both

Real Party in Interest and the trial court have completely ignored the fact that the

parties agreed to the Docket Control Order and that that Order and the Texas Rules

of Civil Procedure are clear as to the discovery deadlines. Real Party in Interest’s

29 failure to diligently utilize the procedures for discovery disprove any attempted

showing of good cause for the granting of a trial continuance to conduct discovery.

Relator will be prejudiced by the granting of a continuance in this case

because the trial court not only gave Real Party in Interest even more time but most

significantly, has allowed Real Party in Interest to do the work that she should have

done to prove her case within the deadlines imposed by the Agreed Docket Control

Order. Real Party in Interest has had more than sufficient time to conduct discovery

and obtain evidence to prove her alleged claim of common law and has failed to do

so. Relator contends that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the trial

continuance and opening discovery to allow Real Party in Interest to take depositions

and attempt obtain evidence to prove her claim of common law marriage, essentially

shifts the burden to Relator to disprove the claim. Relator has been diligent in

conducting discovery, secured evidence, and procured witnesses to dispute Real

Party in Interest’s alleged claim of common law marriage to Relator’s deceased

father while Real Party in Interest has caused nothing but delays in these proceedings

and has failed to do anything to prove her alleged claim of common law marriage.

By granting the trial continuance, the trial court has allowed Real Party in

Interest to bypass the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and the Agreed Docket Control

Order, giving her the opportunity to obtain evidence to prove her case, when she has

displayed a complete lack of diligence in doing so within the deadlines imposed by

30 the rules. The trial court’s action clearly amounts to abuse of discretion, especially

when the trial court had previously allowed Real Party in Interest resets of the

matters pending before the court to prepare her case. Relator further contends that

the trial court’s actions of opening the discovery period to allow Real Party in

Interest to take depositions outside the discovery deadlines is not only a clear abuse

of discretion but extremely prejudicial to Relator, who vehemently disputes the Real

Party in Interest’s common law marriage with Relator’s father and has worked

diligently to counter Real Party in Interest’s claim and prepare for trial. To excuse

Real Party in Interest’s lack of due diligence and allow her to conduct discovery in

contravention with the rules and the Agreed Docket Control Order constitutes a clear

abuse of discretion by the trial court. The trial court in its ruling allowed Real Party

in Interest to take the deposition of Relator, her biological brother, and a non-party

and ordered Relator to make herself and her brother available for depositions on or

before September 10, 2015. Relator has no adequate remedy at law and moves this

Court for a writ of mandamus to stay those depositions and the trial date rescheduled

to September 17, 2015, and directing Respondent to abate all further proceedings in

this matter until this Honorable Court rules in this matter.

31 PRAYER

Relator requests that this Court grant her Petition for Writ of Mandamus and

Order the County Court at Law, sitting as a Probate Court, Starr County, Texas, to

vacate its Order dated September 1, 2015 granting Real Party in Interest’s trial

continuance and opening the discovery period to allow Real Party in Interest to take

depositions of witnesses outside the Docket Control Order deadlines. Relator further

requests that this Court enter an emergency order abating all further proceedings

before the County Court at Law and to preserve the Docket Control Order and its

deadlines in all respects which was entered by the parties on July 23, 2015, closing

the discovery period as per the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure incorporated into the

Docket Control Order. Relator further requests that this Court abate the depositions

ordered by the trial court to be taken on or before September 10, 2015 and the trial

set for September 17, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. until a further date after a decision by this

Court. Relator further requests that this Court remand the case for trial without

further discovery, and any filing of motions past the deadline to file motions, and for

any and all other relief, in law or in equity, to which Relator may be justly entitled

to.

32 Respectfully Submitted,

/S/FLOR E. FLORES

Flor E. Flores THE LAW FIRM OF FLOR E. FLORES, PLLC 700 N. Flores St., Ste. E Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 Tel: (956)263-1786 Fax: (956)263-1750 Email: ffloreslaw@gmail.com

33 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4, I hereby certify that this

Petition for Writ of Mandamus contains 4,995 words. This is a computer generated

document created in MicroSoft Word 2013, using 14-point typeface for all text,

except the footnotes which are 12-point typeface. In making this certificate of

compliance, I am relying on the word count provided by the software used to prepare

the document.

/S/FLOR E. FLORES Flor E. Flores

34 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Flor E. Flores, certify that on this the 4th day of September, 2015, I served,

with prior notice, a copy of this Petition for Writ of Mandamus, to all required

parties as per the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure, as follows:

VIA HAND DELIVERY VIA CMRRR NO: 7014 1820 0001 7960 7289 Hon. Romero Molina 504 N. Britton Ave. Rio Grande City, Texas 78582

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL: gilberto@gilbertofalconlaw.com Gilberto Falcon THE LAW OFFICE OF GILBERTO FALCON, PLLC 320 Lindberg Ave. McAllen, Texas 78501 Attorney for Real Party in Interest Maria Adriana Flores

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL: robieflores@att.net Roel “Robie” Flores FLORES ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3331 N. Ware Rd. McAllen, Texas 78501 Attorney for Real Party in Interest Maria Adriana Flores

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL: garzalrawoffice@aol.com Minerva Garza LAW OFFICE OF BALDEMAR GARZA AND MINERVA GARZA, PLLC 200 East Second Street Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 Attorney Ad Litem for Unknown Heir of Artemio Rios, Deceased

35 APPENDIX

1. Application for Appointment of Dependent Administrator

2. Application to Determine Heirship

3. Agreed Amended Docket Control Order – Cause No. DC-13-971

4. Petition in Intervention for Determination of Right of Inheritance

5. Oder on Applicant’s Amended Motion to Compel Discovery & for Sanctions

6. Email to Real Party in Interest’s Attorney Re: Docket Control Order and late Discovery

7. Applicant’s Motion for Docket Control Order

8. Agreed Docket Control Order – Cause No. PR-14-16

9. Amended Notices of Intention to Take Video and/or Oral Depositions, with Subpoena Duces Tecum of Maria Adriana Flores, Ana Belia Rios, Beatriz Rios, and Felix Rios, Jr.

10. August 6, 2015 letter from Real Party in Interest’s Attorney attempting to schedule Depositions in Cause No. DC-13-971

11. Defendant’s Motion to Quash Depositions of Stephanie Rios Noticed by Intervenor Maria Adriana Flores and Motion for Protective Order

12. Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Strike Maria Adriana Flores Individual Capacity’s Plea in Intervention

13. Letter from Real Party in Interest dated August 18, 2015 attempting to schedule depositions in Cause No. DC-13-971

14. Applicant’s Motion to Quash Depositions of Stephanie Rios, Artemio Rios, Jr. and Hugo Alaniz, Jr.

15. Amended Notice of Intent to Take the Video and/or Oral Deposition of Stephanie Rios, Artemio Rios, Jr. and Hugo Alaniz, Jr.

36 16. Real Party in Interest’s Motion for Continuance

17. Relator’s Response & Objection to Motion for Continuance (17 and 17-A thru 17-K)

37 0cloc(

MAY 0 I 20r{

IN TIIE ESTATE OF li RT ARTEMIO RIOS, s 9 $ $ SI'ARR COUNTY,TF]XAS

TO THE IIONORARLE JUDGE OF COUITT COMES NOW, STEPHANTE LEE RIOS. ApplcanL. ,nd files Lhrs Appticaron ApFoinrmenrofDepsndenr Adjrnj $mlor oa Lhe Flae oI ARTEMIO RloS, Dec.rsld xnd ..use oracr'or wjllshow Lu!o rhrs coun rhe ioltoung:

is m individul doniciled in and restding al l8j0 Cuadalupe St, Rio ^. Texa 78j82, SlaF Coulr_ Texas, and jj CiLl, _Applicanr Crando a.r0rg ,n Lhr rnrtrer try and rhroush her dtrt) iullDrized rdrEsenhhe. Thr app|canr r Lhe dccedor\ daugncr drd ha\4n rL.r!{trr rrc cskre ofARTEMTO RIOS, Deceased

Deceden! died on Novenber 30, 201:l h Rio Crdde CiLy. SLan CourLy. Tcx{ ar $eaee ol 19 yeds. Thedcccdenrdied inle$arc

L This Coun ha j uisdrcrion ord verue isproper because Al.RrrMtO RrOS Deccasrd war doniciled.nd had a n\ed ptace ofEsidcnce in drh.ounrr, r( Lho trDr oi dcrLh h Sr.. CounLv

Decedenr owned propeny described gcDerxt ], as real pbper' snh an unknou eilue a( de dme oI tiling tlis applaion

Decedem owned propcny dcscribcd Eenemily !s F,:omr propcly wi(h an unknorD wlue aL the rine offitine rhis apptiadon Appr.ur.on beball.of Deccdent, fited a wrlngfLt dsarh slir curcnLly pendoe uDder - Cause No DC-ll971. in the l8l'L Jndicjat Dhhcr cour1. sLa,r Co!nly, Texas. tor damages ,o excss ofOne Mnlion DoUan ($t,000,000.00) v, Tle @es, ages, meiul shlus, addre$es. dd Elanon ps !o decedenr of each her ro lhe d@edenL is a follows: STEIHANIE LEE RIOS (razsrle.l Ager l8 Single lElo cuadatupe Sl. Rio Gande Ciry, Tex$ 78582 s@coury,Texas

ARTEMIO tuOS, JR. (lb,l

1810 cuadallpe SL Rio c@de CiLy, Texas 78582 SuE Cobly, rexas u As far a knoq by Lhe aFpLjcanr ar dre riDe ofttrc fi jDe otLh6.ppLtcaLt.n. rh. tiLkNing child *d presuinably bom 6 rtre decedenr. burpaLcnry rsdtrpurert

AMYRTOS

5691Tmpi@St. RioCmndeCiry.TexasTB58z SLacCouhry.Texas YII, As te d known by lhe applictur at rhe hre of Lhe fihrg of dns app icatron,.{RTBMIO RIOS, Decedent, w6 neler ndied.

Th€ inteEs in Decedenas eslarc requtfes mmed,,le ipFonrmeDr ol.a Dependenr Adm'ntrtra'or ARTEMIO RrOS has died *nho lervnrs a w lt. thc indivrdlalr named jn rh6 applicarion consrirule aU of rhc Decedcnfs hei6 ed disorbules and have lon rn rh6 appncauon ed de advNabiliLy ofhavins a Dependcnl Adnnntsldtron S,l.DpflANtE agree on

LEE RIOS has been designard by the known hens aL Iaw otDecedenr 10 se.!e as Dependenl Adminhttsbr. The distribulees reqlesl rhar 0o rcrion be Gken ,n lLls ( o0n on ,e djon @ lhe sedeme offiedecedenasesEcofier rd Lhe rerum ofa. Lnverory,opprarscmenr, and tisrot clains of rhe de@denas cNaLe and se{le all pending clainrs for money dama8es on behalt.of Decedhas .srsF AI disribLkes join in rhjs rc.lLes ard warve rc issrancc aDd seN,cc of citalion. Allesed heirs &d dinriburees .a Deccdenl whose paremiry is dhplred have bcen seryed w'lh Cirado. rhrcugh pesonat seiviccs

Appl'c&l would be a suraote rop.esenlarive, is enLnlcd ro admnxjraLjor and ,5 nor dhqualilied by lowro srve ds aonx.6tErorot dns esate

The adhinkrraror ofrtris e$are shou d be siver rtrc l.oltowDrg !olej\: I Tale charge ad possession of DeccdeDas esmle. LnctLLdmg. bd noL Iinrired Lo. peenar and real popeay 2. Payany dd all dcbrowedbyDecedetrraL the ddreofhhdeah. l R€piese.r Decedenr in ey and a hrgadon pendingpiorio Decedenfs dearlr RepEseft Decede.t ir hisarion aisjns ed a, b.,."". oul ol.Decedenfs u -' Defehdanls $hich inay J;::::_Tii":il^ XJ. "-".",,". The adDinisrraroi shoutd be appoinled penaneDr adnrtnrftLor puNrtu ro secroo lllAC) ofrhe Probsle code. WTJEREFORE, PREMISES CONSTDDR!]I), s IElllANlt: RIOS. ApptLcror hosn reque$s rhat Cihrion be issued as requifed by la,! aod thar appjtrallr be ]nxncdracty appornLed a Adoinishlor of Decedenf s esrllc.

'IdE LAN FrnM oF t.Lon PLLC

RiocmndeCiLy, Texas 7s592 Tel (956) 261-t786 Ia\. (956)263 t75.l ., +ILED | 0r1-0.tsl:M r,raY 2 8 20v1

IN TEE ESTATE OF $ TN TIIE C COURT s ARTEMO RIOS, s AT L^W Or s $ STARR COUNTY, TEXAS

.A.PPLICATION TO DEIERM]NE TIEIRSHTP The folding ApPlidL STEPHAITIE Rro9 tumtuhes rh. toUowii€ inlnmuon

I aRTEMIO RIoS ("D*edmtl djed on Novmb€! 30, 2013, at tlE aBE oI 39

h FaLon rieighb, StaE C@ty, T€s. 2, A D€p4dmt D4€d6(s 6tate ji Fndmg beioE Lhs ation uPon

udd court c:]G Nd PR-1!r3, stJba tu th. Est4t of '(,tm to Rios Ii i' in tlE hst inssl ol rhe Estate ior L\e Courr b detemine who N rhe heirs and orny hei6 of the

3, Appliat claiN |o be the owr o! aI d a Paft or D(edstr Estak nE la5l Lhc {iigjls of t]le smial suty nubq ol 033 Tlt lst rlte digrs of hd Tdas

Identin@tion cd.l de 16?

4 Th€ lrdo ed Fsid6.5 of all or Dfr€dent s heus, tlE relatioch]P oI eacl

her b Ddedmi dd dE he intere* of Bre APPIidt and of each ol the hei6 in the EstaE

of De.edstft d follosl

ARTEMIO RIOS, JL Rjo Grdde Cirt, Td6 78s82

Shat of Real PmPeny Shd of Pqsn l PloP€rtY:

Rio cdde Gry, TM 745e2

I. ttu eshkalAei D'c6l ^@

\ CAUSE NO, DC-13-9?l

I{UGO AI,ANIZ JR., STEPIIANIE RIOS 6 IN TIIE DISTRICT COURT d ARTEMIO RIOS, JR, Ibdividurlly lnd s Oa h.U of ti. Esrar. of ARTEMIO RIOS, I Praintillr, s s $ s JOANN GONZAj f,Z md s TLAMES GONZAIEZ, s $ AND 38f' JUDICTAL DISTfuCT s MARIA MAGDAI,ENA FLORES, AS NEXT s FRIEND OF AIIfY DEL CARMEN RIOS, A s MINOR CHILD 5 rnletukoFPraintills $ I s 5 ANDERSON COLUMBIA COM}ANY, INc-, s I $ STANR COI,NTY, TEX,AS

AGREED AMENDED DOCKET CONTROL ORDER

Plointiflss InrePcnos, od Defendd! app.&.d dd alE d, dd rhe coun .nter.n the lollowiDg

1. Jury rel4tioFTri.l: octoberl9,2015 rr 9:00 a.m,

2, Dsign.tioborE p..t: aJ Plaintif*4nre no^; May8,20l5

3.

I3,2015

18,2015

4, Daub.rt/Rob'.&r E€rrtbca (ir fteded): ffisr-?- mrs rt e:oo !.D. May ll I0,2015

3, Fiul PFTrtrl Corlft.e PuBu@r lo T.R,C,P. # t66: Oclob.r

6. Arl Motiols n lihine sh,U h.6lcd dd h€.d ot 6nal rl.

Tri.l Noteb@ks shall be incompli sth T R C,P, 166, irctudjns sFEiat

srcNED AND ORjIER'ED ON rrtrS _Ld,y of _Eq 2015.

LAPFAE&! S,P.L.L.C. 601 Sa$ter StsEt, Suit€ 650

!d: (713)?3910r5

lreiLhab@iohs.com chri{opt'q@oFzcjohB.@d Co Ploi.r't/ InENetur 0rl30/2dj.6 33Pl

4 AmmdnanrofPrudingr(Pllindfi)r Maylll0,20l5 b) Amendnenr ol Plc.dinss (Dcfqrdmo: Iuty6,20L5

5 rhrlPrsjl.i!lcoDterence Purruanrtd l.R.C.t,r td6 O.rober J 20ls .lc:00r,n. AllMoions in Linine lhdlbefileddd hddar 6Mt!Etri.L.

T.tul Notabooks aE due No (2) wc.k befoe tinal Pe-TrL,l coo cie. Ti,rlNorebook sh'l b. in@mpliatrc w"h T R.C.P t66, inoludingsp@ial

SICNED ORDERID ON THIS t0r5.

THE I-AW FIAfi OF IIOR !, 700 N. Flora Srot Sufue E R o Cad! C'ty, Tdas ?3532

s, P.L.t-c Fax. (956) 263'1750 sun.650

ConNel lbr Ptaintilf / ln t FIRM, PLLC

(e5o 658.3t@ i (956) 66&8101

Kni( D, Willii S llo,2l64i5oo

s 240?0854 , Suile 520

' (2t4) 736.9t94 6l^",g,JX

II{ TBE FITATE OF 9 I]t TIIE COIJ]\TY COIJRT AT LAW $ NRTEMIO RIOS, sor $ DECE I) 5 ARRCOt TY, TEXaS PETTTION IN INTERVENTION FOR DETERMINATION OF RICEr OF INEERITANCE

tu of InhcdbiE wiL'r tbis Coun 6 e Brh of rhe d@6 ot Andio Rios CDenmr"), and psur to s4rion 2ol .052 of the Texa Bbld codc ed Espedily sbmi6 b llc cout lhc

! Sr@heir Rios ha filed e Applienon to Dclmidc iship in tlis &rion dd my b€

wid nolie ofihi! Pailion in htrmrion by sddin! o 6py ro hd adomcy, FIor E. FtoE, d700N no Sr., Sr., E, tuo Ctud. Cify, Texs 73532. Arcmio tuc, J. hs 6lcd o Ejvn of ldie olrhc ADpliQlion fil.d by scphmie tu6 fiemayt *nn rcd* ofrbis !.tirion ir ddon by endrng a 6py b his addcs, l33O GuddlulE Cnok, Rjo CEde City, TX

78582. Any rj6 (r b'niot lhbugh [d n*r 6cDd Mdir Masda]@ Flc ha fital a pcrirron

inlnrdenlionofrlcApplidion shc m b€ 3@.d wjth no.i€ of riis p.rition in tnR{rion

Mqi, Ailnua FloFs, is a cidcnr of Se Coury rno r6i at l?2 L4 bbs, Rio

Gadc Ciry. TS5e2 hd ha ajdiciabtc lnr.Esr in rfit pftc..ding 6 rh. @hnon t.w wifc oa

Aenio tu6 ridd E S Cou(y, Tq6, ud dicd incabre on or aboutNowmh.r lO, 2013.

Thar Ais Court ha venue MdjuisdicLion oflhc nader b€@w De.€ie M donioitcd in

To ttc howledge ofPeliLionq, lhc decedenL died intcsrat., lcavins no MI. u. Maie Adri@ Ftor B rtuIty otoift ro bc thc omd of sll or o pelt of D€c€ddrs Esre 6 shc B {'. cl@nt spos. of tf,e d4dhr ar rhc rinc of his denise orhe l]1u this

Thc @s ed Esidd@s of 6tl .f Dc.dent s hm, thc Flsrio6hp of eeh hcir lo

enr md lnc u!. nl.€r oi rhc Petilrond Md of @h of rhe hei6 in lhe EsEle of Deccddr

dd t[e !!e i. r of rhc Pelirionu ed of @ch of Lhc i.i6 in rho Btob of D.c.de.r @ s

Nme: Mdia Adrieo Florcs t72tat @ cit tuo GMdc Tx ?35a2 Relatioctupr omon law spow Sh@ofR@lPrcperty ll2 S ofP.6odlProp..tyi l/2

Nmc. Anehio tuos, J. AddEs- 1830 GDdslupc Circl., Rio cfld. city, Ts 73532 RclalioEhip: child Sh@ ofEs.Lp | 16 66% Sha of pson.l pEpertr: 16.66%

Nm.: S hdi. Rios Add : l33O Gu.dalupe CiEl., Rio Gtudc Ciry, T.xa 73542 R.lationship: child SbeofFdpmperty: 16.66% s ofFEoMl pFlcny: 16,66%

tuo Cftrde City, TeE ?3532

She ofpcFobd pDpcrry: 16 66%

D.cedent An.dio Rios w6 n@i.d by €nmon taw t Maio Adiida FtoM_ 1lle

Cour! SeCoety, Texs. All knoM chndEn bon !o or odopted b, De@d hdc b€en lisred lsh kbq Euiagc ofDe€ldt na ben ln@d

A! olllrcation for indeFld.At rdrinishrio! is p.nding bdor? C.Msdcrti.tu. ClE No B not n nc.t s a parry in trle adninisratior poc€dings.

h de €mon la* sifc or dE deedeDt ed h4 slanding s d inEBr.! pdson wilt be ']|r !trc.lcd by lhc pob61c po6-di!gs. MnaA.Litu!Flo re norlroviden wib noli@ ofde

pFbarc F*.dinss ed for good su. deircs ro r. . 6 d ;FE$.d pcmd bd b.

on. of rh. De..dols heiE h lie pFb& pFecdrSs.

PRAYER TOR RELIEI Th.t rhc Pctiriolq h aq@ of lne f&15 smeding lhis pelirion od slae lie rollowinEl

Ttur Pdition r Equ6l rhis Cod ro Bi.w lnis i nLion md pdirion md sho d de cou 6rd il !6r.r, ro cntcr llos ordc6 n.@s$ry ed dul6ri*d wirrl ardio{!siD@dridn & LiirioM slat6 tlEt sbc udcEllrd! rhlr by 6lDS ihis peufion ia I cdcnLion tor

Pctitond cqu6B rhis Coun dcGtuiE od st hlish who is .nLidci ro dE disiibuhon oa

Llrc Coun my d€n Int.denor Mda A

'ne tlw Omce olcilbcrb ral@n, PLLC.

r@silb.nofrrconrav.com 1956j 6274rs9 Fu. (956) 48?-6336

CERTIFICATE OF SER\,ICE

I h. qi9 hrt on Ma!.h 3, 201 5, o nc dd 6rcer @py ot lhc tor.going hs

700 N. FloEs Sdeq Suilc E

T.lNu (9t6)263-l?36 Id nmhq (9JO 263- l ?50 AEobey for stcpbmic Rios l08N.r5d

N@h< (95061r{ l2l E@il- drrr

McAla IX 71501 T.l NEta (95O 65&8100 rd (9JO668-3101 E -riathqu Edlwfm.dE

No 78582 Tol O5q 487.6!6t nubd (956) 437-6336 causE No, PR.1.t4l6 IN TEE ESTATE OF $ IN TgE COIJNTY COURT AT LAW s ARTEWO RIOS, $oF 0 DECA{SED g SIAXR COTJNTY, TEXAS

STATE OI'TE)Q\S s

COIJNAY OF STARR ! $

*kngc, infomdoa dd h.lict

SIjBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME BY Meia Adri@ Floc on

'.J . -L,.rq NoEry Publjc. s ofT.x6 PR 14-16 Lilly cuerrero IN THE ESTATEOF S IN THE COUNTY COURT A'T LA\v s ARTE]IIIO RIOS, I SITTINGAS A PROBATE COLRT DECEASED S STARR COUNTY, TE\AS ORDDR ON APPT,ICANT'S AIIENDDD N IOTION 'I'O COTTTEL DISCOVERY 4I D FOR SANCTIO\S

On.,uly21,2015,lheCou considered amlcant STDPHANI E RIOS' Amended NIor'o.

loCompcl Dscovcry md lor Secuons, and upon 'lue consrderaron, thc Coun Orde6 6 tblLo{ I Mdra Adnana Ilores ed/or adoney G bcno Fahon, dc ORDERED Lo polrde

an$\en lo ApphcaDfs Ftrsl SeL oflnlcrcgatones, Reque$s for Admrrons, ed Requcsts tbr

Produclron by July 10,2015 by 5 p m

2 lqana Adnxnd Florcs dd/or anorney C'lbe.to Falcon, ate ORDERED to provLde

responses lo Applicanas Reques6 for Disclosurcs by July 10.2015 by t p m

IT IS FtlRl-HER ORDERED lhaL a Specral Jury Tnal 6 ser for Scplcnber l,2015 aL

lT lS FURTHER ORDERED lhar lbe lollowing deposllrons Nrll be hcld as folloss

I MdndAdrjanaFlorcsshallappearfotadcposrlrononJulyll,20l5atl000am i!Thc

Ldv Fimr ofFlorE Flores,PLLC, ?00N Flores SL, Sle. E, RioGrdde Crtv.Ter6 7E582

2 Fcl[ Rlos, Jr shalL atpear for a deposlron on July ll. 2015 al I 00 tmd The LaN

frnofFlorE Floies, PLLC, ?00 N lloresSl,Ste E, Rro 6mde CiL-v. Texas ?8i 82

I AnaBe|aRros shcllappcar for a deposilron o0 Julyll,2015 al2 00 p h atTheLaN

FtrnofFloiE Flores, PLLC,700N Flotes St, Slc E,tuoCrMde C(y, Texd78t82

PF ta t6,t)th. Ede oft4qna Rrc oFDER oN ArplrcaNf \ {n.\D.D rtofl or rocowLL lr6cor.RY & Fo[ sArorors ofFld E. Ilorer PLIC. ?00 N. Ilorcs St, Stc E, Rio Gffide City, T.rc ?8582. 015 SIGNEDON

HON ROMERO MOLINA PRESTDING JUDGE

/fud

a,ot tf* tt@io l&isr ,.il Flor Flo6

Artemio Rios Estate

FlorFloEs !lbd. May 13,2015 ar 1209 pM ro 's'rb€rto@s b€norarcon aw.com' ccr Nad a LA1

Oh Apdl 1si, lsenlboth ol you an emaitrequeslinq lenralNe tna dates so we coutd nnatze the Oocket Conrrol OrderrheJudgeinstructed!sloslbmilnrhsmaller.Isn@M6y13thand havenolEcevedacspons," from you. l am requesling one lasl lrhetnaldales n June lrcmyou so can gel lhis casescheduted tr tdont rcceive a esponse, l wjll subm l a Dmkd conlrolord€r wjlhoul you inpul hnk thavewaited tong enouqh Addrl'onally. yourdiscovery €sponses a€ ovedue Pl€ase atlow th's etecllon c corespondenc€ lo setoe as a Iomarcq*sl for€sponses by no lat€rlhan lhe end otlhebusiness day on Monday, May 13,2015 Lftdonot Eceive sad rcsponses I wilL be liling a Ntot on for conlempl and forsanclons.

Tnank yN loryour prompt atlenl on 10 lhese malleF

li\tt.\4).t LdLttr, knq.\tr^ 2nl| 4tl:t)it The Law Fim of Flor E. Flores, PLLC 7tl0 N.I.lorcs St., Stc. E tuo G.,nde (iio,'le$s 78581 'rer (956)263,1786 |ix: (956)263-1750 \ \ \. fflo.csla\ .com trlo.cnr(@goin.(,m Fir€d:05111/2015

NTHEISTATEOF O NTHE COU\TI COURT s 5 ^T LAW s $ STAXR COUITTY, TEXAS

TO TIIf, HONORABLE JUDCf, OF SAID COURT: coMES \Ow, STEPIId\IE RIOS, rhe Aptlicanr l. Lh s lcion, .nd Rques for a D..keLConrclConfeence, and in suppon dercotwtllsho$ unro lhis Cour fie fotlow'.e:

Thh prc.ecdi4 h i conreied mader *heEby rhe Appliconr is seeking b be appoinled rcpresenorive of de Enate ol ARTEMIO RIOS. Applk.nr is lhc biological daugh@r ol ARTEMIO RIOS, dec&$d. MARIA ADRrA\A FloRtrs hd nled lnrd.dion dajmin! an

ro b. de common LN wife of ARTE:VIIO RIOS, de.elsed I!,{RL{ ADRIA\A FLORES is STEPHAME RIOS e reprsenraLile ofAXTEMIO RIOS' 6Ee ThE maoerha be.n pendingsince Mry l,2011. Applimr STEPI{ANIE RIOS hd filcd , J!ry D.mand on ft. isiuc ofcommon lae ndiag! an,l dl plnns app.&ed for a heari.g in Uis man{ on Mrch 26, 201J. The Coln Or!i*e'i lhe panEs ro edr.r rnto a do.ker conml order and seL fte daner for dal. Since L\en. AppLhanr has madr requc$ for Trial dncs from lnr!frcnor's counsel and non hale been

Applica fil.d awonsluldedh cNe on behallofher tarher,ARTtr}rIO RIOS. decs$d rdfie33l'Jud'cioLDudc!Cou(!^deidcsehserlorTdrlonOdobeil9,20l5.Thisnate. hsb.enconrinuedon..sdrhepsdiessillnorasreeroflothercontinusce thk hadshs ro b. (solv.d beforc rhe {rongfuL dedh kial. Allpanns, indudin8 lnredcnor II{RIA ADRUu\A FLORXS, h6 had sufficrcnr rime Lo ensase in di$ove!- ro finrLize rheprcbale mr(flandprcc.ed 1o rial on th. common Laq issue,

which needs o be.esoLved b.forc ihew.onsfuLderfi cssepmceed! ro trial. AppL'chra$.dr dar 5 daJ_s h necesary o prcvent hinh WEI.REIORE, PREnflSES CONSIDERED, STEPdANIE RIOS, Aptlrcml 8bd

hrer for Tdal on rh. McriB, md for sny rd ,ll oAd Eli.f, ir lN or in .qunt o which

R€pond. n.y b€ jdly en tl.d6. R6F.tflllt $bmille4 TS'L FM TqNR E. FLONES' OF TLLC 700 N FloG st, St E tuo CFndc CirY, TerG 73512 T.L(956)261_l?36 Fq: (95O 26r_ 1750 EFAiI:

Bv, /gFLOR f,. FLORFI

9EBrgre4x!-9rs!8ucE I, Flor E Flor.., by cdiry $don lhis rtE!:!9 d.v of rue 2015 d de ad codt copv

]I!A.EMA!,I v!A-E!4Ae: VI-{ ELECTRONIC FILINCi

TH' LAW OFTICE OF GILAERTO FAICON' PLIT

McAIl.n, Tcxa 73501 )turvrJor ltuenent Mo'o A.lrino Ftotu!

1t!!!o8-E MBES--

ft ?Nr4t6t h tu tud.41d.dp Atq k@dd IN TI1I ESTAT' O}' s IN TIII COU\ry COURT I AX,TEMIO fuOS, I s STAIR COU\TYi TEXAS OR'f,ROI AT'PLICANTIS MOTION TO COMPIL & FOR SAIVCTIONS

. rhc Coun @nidcr.d App ir&r s Mor on ro Cohp.l& lor Sdflrcns. and aner rcviewing rhc pL*d'ncs and he ne arcu(hrotcouset. rhe coud noalhe opinion rhrl erd morion shoutd bc GIIANTED. The Coun ORDERS lnrsrenor MARIA ADRIA,\ A FLORi'SI L To P3) Applienr's dromey, FLor!. FtoEs, $e slm ofS7O0.m tor$endccsiq,otntjng 6i5 Morion b Compcl and tor Ssctions on b€hrtfofsTEplll-Vf, RroS. 2. To prcdue dcmenb h Appiitrl s Reqfs tor P,odu on of Deumens s,din five 15)&rsorr h€iis n s ddrcrorby 'h I To p.ovidc resp.nses oAppticdrs Re,]l66 fo.Disct6uEs wnhin five (5) dlts ota

,20r5. .1 To pmvide fs-..e6 F ]\ppticanfs FiNL s.r otlnLerosarnes drhin five (5) da': ofa hqi.g i. rhis msner or by ,2olj. Ihe coun fuihs oRDERS and mks a Jud'c al findins rhar |ne Admissions *ru.d uno lnrdenor 34 dc.md adhiftd ,nd pEvenr tfledenor tdm presenunc evidcnce ar trnt which conftr.tr nane6 *hich have be€n dehedadmined. The Coun tunher ORDERS dal: l. Thel cfrcnor r plead in8s be nnck n and LeminoB dny fuans d G.overy b) tncdqor 2. Prchrbir lnrencnor Fom iilFdrcing &y documen6 d dd shich reE equen.d jn dtrcovq- and noL pnnued. CAUSE NO. PR.I+I6 IIi T}IX ISTATE OF s I\ TEf, COUNTY COURT $ s ! $ STAITR COU\TY, TXXAS ORDIRON A}PLIC{XT'S MOITON I COVPIL& FOR sANCTIONS

rhe coln lon'derd qppti!&,3 \ronon b Compeia lor Sandionl' and sner rcvic*idg LhepteadinCs and hlanDgarsmenrofcounset. ge CounEofd. opinron thar said hodon shautd b. TXD C Thr coln ORDERS tnredenor MARIA ADRIAT\A ILORXSI L rop3) Appliqfsadomcy, FtorE. FtoEs, dcsuD of$700 i]O a.! rh. ieesiryotnting Morjon b compet and for soc ons on behalfoa 'nh sl uHs^rx Rros. ?. loproduedocMcnb inAppt,.das Rcqusr Iof pnrdua,on or Docunenawj$in fivc T5)&y\ofr heJnng h dris mJnerorby I To pmvide rcsponses b Appliqm s Requcsb tor Dn.lo:ns wd d tjve (5) dals ofa

4 To pmvide ssqcE @ apptrsnrs tri^r ser oa Incnogmrjes hannsin rhis h,n{ or by The coutr tud\er oItDERs aid maks , ,!dic,l finding rhd dc Admjssions ed unro fcruenor aE demen admrd.d and prve tikdcnor rdm prc*nhnB evidencc d oiat qhich controv.e manen shih hrvc been deem.,l adniien The coln tuahd ORDERS rar. L T]1e Inroenots pteadings h€ erick.n dd r.minatcs dy 6fner djsoverl by rnbn.nor 2. PrchibiL tnuo-e'or trom inhduc,ng my deudenE ar ,nd shhh *eE Equsred in oKovery od norprcdued SICNEDON:

JUDCE CAUSENO, I]Y TIIE ESTATE OF t ARTEItroRtoq I - : arlAw S STARR COTA"TY, TP,JTAS

Do.td Contror , rhe cou .dnsid..cd Appt,canas Conlecne. Mo.ion b ft. coud s* mrq Julv 23, 2o1s 'nis aor a he atinE dn 6/122015 s,cNrDon

.1l5PLLC .,+.t:; , AUG 2 0 2015

CAUSENO PIt-\,.l. \rp

Cl.r" + i"q*

SIARRCOTNry,IE).AS

DOC]GT CONTROL ORDER

BE REMEMBERiD lnAI ON dryol 201i, ad€kd

JurlTialreqEied Yes

B. I)ead ine ro rcqlen foflury:

n.a..:,erio. In.l q oO >.d { Pre.Tral6 eEn.e i5 ser for (Prrr3 Nokbd rmadbo) E. The dadhne to'fitingaLl disposit' The coun will $hedule o hariig oi eid moion, upod de filng df tre. Thededhne forfitiiS: td sposit'\e ,u,nn,D morions

herngon e'd morionsupon lhe fihng

The deadhne for dcngnarion of expen * ni$ses tor D€fendmt G) ,,. rV'f l H. The deadL'ne lor desigration ol expen vM6scs lor PlaintifG) is TftCP The dead ,ne ror !omplerion ofdi*o\err for DdcnLlrnr (r) trr TNI P The dsd 'tu ror (ompletion ofdb6v!.J rorPtamtifi(,1L [4tp Ih" dtudL'r forn".dnr .or atlp'e.o ng. o hrn frno.nr\.rj 7-7C P

L. -hedm.'oe ro' amenomel .Irllpl""dns.forh"Ps" r

APPROVED As TO rORMr

@,<,"1

PLL1

S) ATTOTNEY

rlEs TcJ, (r'D 1t7-zt3 t F)x: G5i6) At?-aqoL cALstrNO. PR-1r-16

]\'I'IIE ESTAI'EOF S l^_ THE COUTY COURT AT LAlv

lRTETIIO RIOS. SIT ING AS A PROBA'IE COLRT

DECEASED ST'ARR COUfTY. TEXAS

ATINDED NOTICE OFI\TDNTION TO'I'AKEVIDf,O AND/OR ORAI' Df, POSTTION. \\'II'H S(IBP@

orlO{ Brllon Avc.R,o CrandeCrl), fcxas 78582

PLEASE T,\KE NoI ICE lh.t, PutsuanL to Rulcs lt9 dnd 201 I offic lcxs Rulei of

c,v Proccdu.e, Appl'cant STEPHANIc RIOS rvilL Gke the lidco and/or oraL dcporlron of

iARL\ ADRIANA FLORES od aqust 1, 20I5, .l I l:00 ,.n. Ths deposron w'll Lake p xcc

aLThc Lnl lir ofFlor E, Florcs, PLLC,7O0 N.l-to.s St, Sle E, RioCr{nde Citv. Ttxrs

?8582 The deposrion shall conhnue i.orn dat lo da!nnol coDrPleled lhBdcporlron rv'lLhc

ralcn b.lbrc a cedrf'cd cor( reponer ruLhonzcd Io adm,nNrcr oafis Tb* dcPosron Nrll be

srcnosraphrcdlly reco.ded by a cour rcponcr aulhonzed bt la$ 10 Lake deposnions

PLE,\SE lAKli IL-RTHER }_OTICE lhaL puAuant lo Texas Rulcs ofCnll Procedurc

199 l(.),lhe dcpollron of ll4Rll r\DRl-{l',lA ILORES nrat be raken by lhe non $c.oglaPht

neansofay'dcoLap.recordr.g'naddtrronroslenosraPhrcmcans

All pinres rr€ to arcnd and cxa.u.lhe rYtrnc$ dprescnbed bv tho Tcxas Rules 'n!trcd olCruLproceduF and arc fonred thar lLo lestnony dd/or docunrenolion obnin $rllbe $ed

rscvrdcncc nlhe tbove rcfcrenced &rron

Plcasc Lakenolr.elh.L Lhc undcrrgned ay ca0se the deFosuonlo be!rdeotaped

Pu6u3.l lo Texar RuLe oa Crvrl Procedurc 1992(b), $c foLlowrns books, tapc6

documcnh, dd lingrble lhrng,s (bcrcmafler Ffdned lo as docurenls )aE hereb! dc$Erlcd 10

.46P N. m r 16, , tu Endr .lr,44o D@n{r dco^!'vor onr D.Pon'6nwnksub be pnduced by lhe rvrhessat the lide md placc ofthedeportron

I Onginal copEs of aiy and all documcnls and/or rlngrble ttungs revicwed by lou h anrc'prron 10 dd prepararon for th6 dcposition. Ilno ongnal copros ce bs produced, ptedse

produce dupl(.te coples ofthesamc

2 Ong,nd copres olany and alldocumenrs and/or rdgiblc rhings prepJred by you In

preparalrontbr Lhs deposrron for t.al in fth marcr. Ilnoongrnalcoprcscanbcproduced,pte6e

producc duplcare copEs ofrhe sane

3 Ongnal copics ofa.y and dll documenls and/or tangibLe thrnes thal evdcncc your

common law narrage b ARTEiIIO RIOS If no ongnal coprcs can be pioduced. pte6e

produce duplrcatc cop'cs ol lhe same.

I Onghal copiesofany and all docuDo.ls md/or Gogiblerhnss prepaEd by or produed

by any wrLne$ on tour behalf and which evidences a comnon law mdnagc bctweeo you and

ARTEMIO RIoS Ifno ongrnal copres ca bc producod, plcae produce duplcale copres oi rhe

5 Orgrnal Drivcas LicE$e and or Idenhficalbn Cdd issned !o you by lhe Tcxs

DcpdnreDr of PubLc Safery, Liccnsing Divisron.

6 Orghrl Socral Secunrycard B$rcd toyoubylhe Soc$lSecunty Admnslarron

? Coples of an_rr dd all Laxrcluhsprepared byyou lioDz012 to the presenr

3 BankSL,lemenrs nrourname for any and allbank accounBheld byyouwrlhanymd

.ll banl or financral NliLudons 9 Cop,es ofd! and all locumcnh and/or ranglble th'ngs rEr evidcncc lour rssdcnce

cD

Rio Gmnde Cily, Texas 78582 Tel. (956)261-l?86 Ia (956)2611750

By /STTLOR E, FLORES

BarNo 24065235 srare Cawsl lor Apphcant SEphanie Rnr

LaPrz[ & Jorois, PLLC 601 Sasler Strel, Ste 650

Tel (713)739-1010 Fd. (?13)?39-101s chris@l&ere ohns cor

Bt /S/CFRIS L JOHNS

Cn-Co u e Uor 7 pp I i cd t I Step h @ t e R t a s

ci& No f ,!,16, ni tu.'kk o/,4tu',0 nr6 D.@d eu47o cnDeq,doi ddsud CDRTTI]ICATE OI' SERVICE

I, Flor E. Flores, hcreby cenny thar on th6 tbc llf dayofJuly,20t5. a Fue dd corect copy of he forcgotng Arutuled Notice of Intenno" b take Video An Or Ora! Deposino,, tnh skbpoe"4 Dk.a Tecah, of Mnns Arbidtu FIot6, h6 been upon a| panjes of €cord rn

accordtuce uth lhe Texd Rules ofcivil Proceduc

VI,A ELECTRONIC MLING \rIA Ei1{IL: pilbcrforag'lberlorrhontrw,com

TUD Larv Orncr oF crl-tr[Rro F^LcoN, PLLC

TIA ELECTRONIC FILINC vIA EMAIL: plu alarvornce@aol.con

THT T 4$ OI-FI'EOP BlLDIMAN CARZ^ & V^LTVACARA

RioC.Mdeclty, 18582

/STTLOR E. FLORIS

cdneNo PR 11-16. ta ttu Etuk ol At|l kRia, D44d deq {d/or orn &Po{don ds sub C-\t,58 IO, PR-14.16

s I\ TIIE COTJ']'Y COI]RT AT LA\T ! :\RTti['IO RtOS, $ SITTINC AS A PROBATII COITRT $ DfCf,ASED $ STARR COUYI'I,'I'EXAS

.INIE\DED NOTICD OFINTFj\TIONTO TAKE !IDEO ND/OR OR,|L DEPOSIlIO\.wlTIISIIBPODN,\DTJCESTI]CU]!1.OI-TfLI\RIOS, JR,

ITELIX RIOS, JR,, by add through Cilbcrto Falcon. Tle Law Oliice ofGilben. Falcon. ILLC, 120 L'ndbcrg Avcnuc, McAllcr. Icxa 78501 or 404 Bnton Ave, tuo Crande

PI,EASE lAKl, NOTICE rhaL. prrsuant (o Rules 199 and 201 | oflhe Texas Rulcs ol

Crvil Procedurc. ApplLcanL STEPH?\NIE RIos will takc tho vdeo md/or onl depoiLon of IELIX RIOS, JR, onAuCUsl,r,:015, al ]:00 p,n, This depos tio. wrllhke PlacealThc Ln$ lirD0fFlort.l'lorcs,PLLC,?00N.Fl0resS1-'Ste.E,tuoCr{ndcCilt,T.xns?3532'lhc dcponoon shallconlrn0e lrorn Jal Lodiy untilcomplclcd ThE depo$ron$'llbc hkct before tr -lhis cenrfied courr repond auhonzcd lo admnrler oaths dcposrlron *dl be slenosruph,.rlli'

recorded byr coun reporcr authonzcd by law Io lakedepo$rons

ILE,\SE TAKE FURTHER \OTICE lhal pursuant (o Tcxd Rulcs ofClYrl Procedure 199 l(c).lhe deposllron ofFEI-IX Rlos, JR. maybe lakenby rhe n.n scnosraphrc means ol a \rleorape Fcord ng i. add'tron to senoeraphic means

All panres are rnviLed Lo d(cnd atdcxaminethe $Mes a Frescnbcd bt lhe Te\as Rules

ol Civriproccdurc md are rforined rh.t thc Gslimony and/or docLincnLatron oblanrv l be fsed as evrdcncc rn Lhe above{efeftnced dcton Plcasc takc nolrce lhar $e lndcfsiencd nray cause lbe deposLlion to bevrdcolaped

hrsu.nt lo Texas Rule ol Civil PfoceduE 1992(b), Lhe followrs books, pipers, docunen[. and rangiblc dn]gs (hcrenaner Eleded ro N docurnenls") are hereby de$CnalDd to

bc Froduccd bt drc \rllnes ar the rnle and place oltlre depottron

I O.gnal cop,es olrny xnd all docunenls and/or lanetblc 1tu.3s revrcrcd by you ,n lnlrcrprtron ro and treFralron for lhN depo$lon ll no orignal copres can be !rod!.ed, Fleasc produce dupLlcalc coFrcs ofLhc sanre

.o!! No PR r hr r, ,r .id, o/i,!r@ nE D!c6, d@!od//olo{lDcP6n6nwidsub 2 Onsrnal coprcs ofany and all docunsnrs md/or leBible lhings prepded by you i. prcpdar'on for th6 dcposition for rrial in his nauer lfno orisinal copics ce bc produe!. ph6e ptuduce duplcate copres olthesafre

3 Ongin.l copres ofany and all documcnts andor langrblc things lhal you inlcnd lo usc roa 0 you m your rrDr Lest'nrony 4 onBhdcop'es ofany and all documenls and/or Gngible fiings prcduced lo you or oblaDed by you lionr olher persons whrchyou Inrcnd ro usc at tnalto ard you h yourLesrihony on bchaLlolMana Ad.ana Florcs Rcspecltully Subm (red,

THI LAW IIRJ\( OF FI-OR E, FLORES, PLLC

Rio Crande Cily, Texas 78582 Tel (956)261-l?86 Fd (956)263 1750 Ema inoreslaw@mall com /S/FT,OR E, FI,ORES

srarc BdNo 24065215 C o m se I lor Apph ca n t Stephont e Rias

LATEZE & JO[\S, PLLC 601 Sa$1erSEeeL,SE.650

Tel (713)739-1010 Id (?ll)719-l0li

By /S/CTIRIS I' JOIINS

Ca Cantel lar Awli@t SEph@ie Rios

(]au* No ri.!.16; ,r & E!d. o/id4do Ro' D,a,s/ deo bdld cr DePsidon wrh suh CERTIFICATE OF SDRVICE

I, Ilor E floEs, hqeby ceniry tbat on rhis rhe l!: day ofJuty, 20 15, a lrue ed conecr copy of the fde9olnl Arended Notce oI hxetuon to Ttke yideo dkt{ot ont D.positioa, Mth Stbpoenn Duc6 Tecth\ ol F.ti! {lor ./:, bas been upon al I pani$ ofrecold D accodd@ with

rhe aRulesofcivilProedure. VIA ELECTRONIC FILING \.IA ET'IAIL:

THE LATV OFFIC' oF CII-BERTo FALcoN, PLLC

VIA ELECTRONIC FILINC vIA EMAIL: Eazalawoffi c.rA{ol.com

TEE LA$ OMCE O! BALDEMAR C^RA & MIi!ERV^ CAKA Rro G6nde Crry, Tex6 78582

ryFlOR E, FLORES

.aueNr.pRt+b h th E*xEAtuqn3,6 Dtctfd e vrd@ odltr orr DlPG lon nd s cAtrsf No. PR-r{-16 IN THE ESTATE OI' IN THE COUTY COURT A'T' LA\Y s ARTEIIlIORIOS. $ SITTINC AS A PROBATE COT]R'I'

DECEASED ! sIARR COUNTY! TEXAS ATT'NDED \OTICE OF INTENTIO:!'TO TAKE VIDDO AND/OR ORAL DEPOSITION. WITH SUBPOENA DUCESTECUM. OFBEATRIZ RIOS

BE^TRIZ RIOS, btr and throush Crlbcno Falcon, The L:v OErce ofGrtbdro Fatcon. PLLC.120 Lindbcrg Avenue, McAllen,lcxas 78501 or 404 Bfluon Alc. Rro Ctrande

PLE SE IAKE NOTICE lhat, pursuet to Rlles I99ad20I I ofrhe Tex6 Rutes of c'!'l Procedure, Applicanl STEPHANIE RIOS will lakc rhc vrdeo and/or oral dcposi'o. of BEATRIZ RIOS onAtrcusl4,20l5, rl2:00 p.n. Th$ depo$tron wnllakc place a!Thc La\ Firm 0rl_lor E, Flo.s, ILLC,700 N. Flors St,t Src, E, Rio cnnd. Cilv, Tcr.s 78582 The depostronshallcootinle lion day Lo day unrl comFleted ThEdcposnronrvrltbe tdke. before a cenrfied coun reponer duthonzed to adrnlnisler odLhs Th6 deposrion rvilt be lenosmphrc^lty recorded br acoulrcpo eraudonzed by la$ to Lake deposrlrons

ILEASE TAKE FURTIIER \.'O-r'ICE thar punuanr to Tex6 Rulcs ofCrvrt Procedure 199 l(c). the dcposilion of BEATRIZ RIOS may be laken by rhe non+tenosraphic mcans ol a

udcoLapcrccordngDaddrrronrosrcnogftphrcmems Allpanrcsarc Invtred (o arLetul ndexamDe lhcwime$ 4 prescribed by Lhc Tcxas Rules olCrvrlpocedure and ffe Informcd lhaL thc LestiDony and/or documenlatioh obrarn rvrll be used

as cvrdcnce n lhe aboveiefcrcnccd acrion

Please lakenoricc rhaLLhe underrened may c.usc lhcdcFd$lon to bevrdeoraped P!6uMt 1o Texas Rulc of cilil Procedure 199.2(b). the fotto$,ing books, pape6. -docurnenLs documcnls, md langrble rhnss (herenaner refcifed to N ) are hercbydcsiemLed ro be produced bt the vrtness at lhc Lncud placc ofthe dcposrhon

I Onghrlc.p'es ofany and alldocrmcnLs Md/or rmg'ble rhrngs relrclred b! you m snlrcrpalron lo and pEFnton for this dcposuon ll no orgndl copres cdr be produced, ph$e

rroduce duplcalc copics oflhe serc

c rNo PFr rr,',rE ,.o/i,r@tur, D.q@t deo e4d o-r De6n6n wnh sub 2. Oii8inal copi6 of my ed all docm€nls e.Vor regibh things prepeed by you in prepaFtlon for lhB deposition for tnal h lhis nattcr. Ilno original copies can be produced, ples produce duplcare copies of the sne L Oiginal copies ofany nd aU documents andor Engiblc lhin8s 0Et you rntend to usc lo ad you D your tnal tsthony. 4 Ongind copies of any md oll doclmenLs andor lmgibh rhings produced ro you or oblained by you liom o$d pcBou which you Dtend lo ue at hial !o ad you your tstihony 'n on behalf of Mdia Adriana Flores.

RespettuUy Submift€d,

THE L^Tv FIRM oF FI-oR E, FLoRTs, PLLC

Rio G@de City, Tq6 ?8582 Tel (956)263-l?86 Fa (956)263-1750 Email lfl orslawandl.com

By /S/FLOR E. FLORES

srare BarNo 24065235 Consel l4wlicdnt Sleph@ie Rios

TAPEZE & JoHNs, PLLC 601 Sas1tr Steel, Ste 650

Ter {713)719-1010 Fd (713[39-1015 ctuisahwephns om

By /gCtlRlS K JOENS

ca-comsl lq Awnmt gephahE Rlos

Gu9No PR 1+16! rr Es&ft o/Afu'b Ri" D!@d ']I. deo od/ot o4' DlPcidh ne sub CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Flor E Flores, berby cenrry rbar on rhis lhe !g day of.tuty, 20 t 5, a Eue ed corecr copy of ie larcgotne Afthded Nonce oJ htehtion to Take Vid.o ahd/or Otat Deposinon, ,rith Subpo.ta Duca Tecuna of Bearii iior has been upon all parlies of rrcord in acord&ce with rhc TeE Rules orcivit Procedurc

VIA ELECTRONIC FILINC VIA EMAIL: benotatconhwcon

TlI[ LAw OFFICE oF GILBIRTo F^[coN. PLLC 320LindbereAve

VIA ELECTRONIC FILTNG I14j44lt: eazsr,rorfi e@ld.com TFE LNW OFTICE OF BALDIMAR G^RZA & MINERVA CAN

Rro Grdde City, T€x6?8582

64!8R E. fLORES

.i8 Nr PF.trlr. k tr. E.bv ol ad\m Fps. omtt c vid6 dclor od ftpoddon li|n s cAusL No. !R-t1-16

IN TiIE ESTATE OT \ IN TIIE COUTY COLRI'A'I'LA\f s ARTDI\'IIORIOS, 0 SI TINC AS A IROBATE COTIRT s DECE4SED l STARR COUNTY, TEXAS

A\IENDED NO1ICE OI IN'TENTION TO TAKE VIDEO Ai\'D/OR ORAL DEPOSITION. WITH SUAPOENA DL'CEqIEEUUJIIIN{qE!]4-BI.q!

ANA BELIARIOS.byandthrooehGrlbenoFalcon,TheLavOfliceofGrlberloFalcon, PLLC, 120 Li.dbcre venuc, Mc^llcn, Texas 78501 or 404 Br(ton Ave. Rio Grande

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that. pursurnl to Rules 199 rnd 201 | of rhe Tex6 Rules ol C'v'lProcedure. Appl'canl S TEPHAN IE RIOS rvill lakc I he ofA\A rideo and/o. oral dcpos'tron BELIA RIOSonAugusll,20l5, rl l.00 th. Thr deFst,on wrll nkc pla.s ar Th. L{wFirn ol Flor E, Flor6, PLLC, 700 N, Flors Sl,, Stc. E, Rio Grande City, Tcxns t8582 The depo$honshalLconnnucfomdatlodayunxlconrpleted ThNdeposno.*rllbetakenbeiorea cedrJieJ courl reponer lu(honzed 1o !dolnBler orlhs ThLs depo$ron w'll be nenogrrph'cJ\ re.oded br d coun repone' durhon2ed bt law @ Lake depos'lrons PLIIASE TAKE l_URTHER NOl ICri that puNant to Tcxas Rulcs oaCNrl Proccdurc 199 l(c). de depoylron of,\\,4. BDLII RIOS may be hken by lhe non sleno-qdphrc means ofd vldeohpe recodxrg n addrLron lo senosraphrc means

All patues are nvrled lo a(end and exannne the wnness 6 prescrbed b_v lheTexasRules .lCrultro.cdurc a.d a.c Lnfoan.d thal Lhc tcsDory and/or documentaoon obtarn Nrll be uscd

6evdene m lhe lbove referenced rcrion

Pleaselakcnolrcethatlheunderrgnedmry causelhedepostronlobevrdeotaped PuEUanl ro Tex6 nule of Cr! Procedure 1992(b), rhe follorvine books. papc^, documenls, rnd r.ng,ble rhrnes (bere,mter refened ro as do.Dnenr") are hdebl desgnared ro

bcproducedb!rhe\vrhcssatrhclmcandplaccoathcd.pos(ron

I Onernal coprcs ofany and all docuinenls dnd/or ld.grble th'ngs tv'ewed by you 'n anli.rtalroi to and trcparalron lor rhis dcposiLion Iano origmal coprcs car bc produccd, plcasc p.oduced!tl'care cop'ds ol lhe sMre

cN!No !R!16.rdr.\,,.!//,,2(Jro\.rr<4d d@ rqTorofrDeP4nror Fih sq! 2. orisinat coprcs ofay ud thn$ prepded by you jn all documenLs md/o! tangible prepdatron lor lhis deposition forrrial in tLlis naner lfnoori8iml @pr6 co be produced, pte6e produc€ duplicatc copies of the me 3. Onginal copics ofdy md alt dochenrs e(yor tangible lhinga that you intod !o use to a'd you your liEl tesrimony 'n 4. Original mpies ofey ed all d@uhents md/of tanglbte things produced b you oi oblan€d by you Eoh olner petsons $6ich you Dlend !o use at rriat to ad you in your teslimony on behdf of MdDAdriana Ftores.

Respecttu y Subhrned,

TFE L^TV TiRM OF FLOR E. ITORES, PLLC

Rio Grddc City, Texa 78582 Tel (956)261-l?86 Fd (955)263-1750 Emaill

By /S/FLOR E, FLORES

srale BeNo.24065235 Cauhel Jor )pplico Steph@te Rios

LAPEZE & JoHNs, PLLC 601 Sa*1!r SlJeet, Ste.650

Tel. (713)739-1010 Fd: (713)739,1015

By /s/CH S ra JOIINS

Co-Canyl lor Appli@nt Stephmie Fios

a\* .PR-1+16 ra tk Esbb E Adnto Rks, D.eEd deo Dd/d or DlPstdm wih sub CIRTIFICATE OFSERYICf, I,FlorE Flor6, h€@by cerlit that on ln6 thc !!: day ofJuly,20 15, a true ed coiiecr copy of Ihe farcCo ne Ahe ed Notice oI htention to Take Vilteo nh o, Ont D.positior, Mth snbpo.hn Duc6 Teca,tt of Aaa ,a/ia Xiar, ha been upon atl panies or @ord in ecorddce

wrththe Texd Rulcs of Civil Prcedu.€

VIA ELECTRONIC FILINC VIA EMAIL:

TfiE L{w OFFTCE oF G|L8ERro FaLcoN, pLLC

rIIIA ELECTRONIC FILING vl4-El!4ll: TqE LAw Or[rcE oF B^LDEnr R GARZA & MTMRVA CARZ\

Rro Grande Cuy, Texas ,8582

/SIFLOR E. FfORES

Gu* No PR.l+b r' r! E i!2 o/ 4'.d4 RrG, Ddl d d@ od/4 orat D.Pcidon wrh slr FLclFIES!

700 N Flores Slreet Ste E Rrc Gra.de cily. Texas 70582

|b rc.cthd+erenaybesore.olrr{o, ,r Jdror.o lre deposrt o.s or ^ "ugo Atdr'/ Jr An.r Anerro R.\ , We I a /e , o, yet ,akcr tre

on rrral da1e. howeverwe are now requesting lo st2n ar 9:oo a m on lhal date

noLsva abe p ease provde dares forthedepos rons ror lhe fo0owng week. ptease prcvde theses dales no later thzn tomonow al noon so that we en schedute these

llil/ t)L''L' ? FL ESI

FAX COVER SFIEET

Robje Flores/S.rah W Ftores

) 1.43 115a)

l- (r 33tD

O uR.rNr eroRR.vtrw gptrA$coMr,rNr Opr^sRrpry

lL!

r.bh \!trh^. 7m7r amd eAusE No. Dc-13-971

IITCOALANIZ, JR., STEPI]ANIE RIOS $ IN TIIE DTSTRICTCOIIRI And ARTE^{rO RIOS, JR , hdividunuv rnd ! On Behrlforthe Enale oTARTEMIO RIOS, $ Plniltills, $ s s s JOANN GONZALEZ and $ R{TTES GONZALEZ, $ s ! ]8l''JUDICL4L DISTRICT ! \'\RIA YAGDALI'NA FLORES, AS $ NEX FRIEND OI AT'IY DELCARMEN s RIOS, I'IJ\OR CHN,D s s ! $ ll,ORES, IndividurllY $ $ $ ! $ COLIJIlBIA COMPANY, INC., $ ^NDERSO:\ $ s STARR COUN'I Y, TEL\S

Df,IENDANT'S I{OTIO\ TO OUASTI DEPOSITION OF STEPHAT{IE RIOS NOTICED B\ ISTFRVE\UI{ PL.\I\ I T \hRI,A ADRI{AA FI OR PROTECTIVE ORDER

,IO THE HONOR{BL'JUDGE O[ S{ID COURTJ

CONIDS NO\\ , Andelson Coluhbia Conpdnv, lnc Delendant here n md files |ns Molron

10 Quash IntrvcnoFllr'nlilTMana diana Florcs ( f_lo'es ) Nollce ol lnLenion Io Take the oral

the Coun as Depositrons of Stefhmre Rios, and Motron Ior Irrotcctlve Order and $ould show

D.rrmrssrrorlo\roa(a!{Drrcsrro\sorSrLrHANrEtuosNdrcEDBtlNrERv'roF-PL{\ftrt}L{nIA ii""i. r..^.i rt-;. -- p ^" L

MOTION TO OUASII .

I On May 29,2015, Deienddt Anddrcn Colmbia Company,Inc noticed tle dePoshons of

Arrenrc tuos, Jr., Hugo Alaniz, J!. md SlePhdie Rios ed Ptodu@d fies notrcs lo

InleNenoFPlahuff llores' @unFl via facsinil€ whDh M confimed a reeived t'e Err,bt-4 No ootion to qudh s filed with thN Coun bv Floret couns.l.

2. The deposilioN of lhe PlainLifrs w€re held on Jue 9, 2015 in tuo Ctdde Citv Tes AlL\ough inviLed to arcnd ed prcPerly noticed with lhe notice, Ilores @unsel did nol atlend

d.posilioN See aJ,6,t ,. 'ha. l. On August 6.2015, via facsmile, nndeBlsned cohsel reerved lne Notices oflntenlion !o

Take lhe Oral DeposiLions of Ademio Rios, Jr', HDSo Ald% Jr' dd Stephoie Rios

scbeduled urlaledlly by Flores on AueDsl 6, 20l 5 Sed Exlirit c'

4. Counsel for Defenddt M never consulLed regddns dv 6Ped ofhe dePosilions ofihe

5 Tbe Court should qudh the deposition nolice of SrcphmF Rros bccause the tde ed Place

desEm€d for StephmE Rios deposrlDn is uuesonable The Court should turlher q@h

rhis deposnron becase Counsel for Defendmr did no! agee with counel for Plainuf_

lnt€peDor regfiding the time ed plae. Fimllv, the courl should quah the deposidon not&

becase lnc dcpor ion ha already becn laken

6 Defenddt fdrther noles to quash tbe notice ofdeposition of S@phsi. Rros for r€don

thal comel foi Defendanr s uable lo atlend fte dePoslron as not'ced. dd h'r€bv oblecls to

rhe tine, date, ad place of lhe oral dePosil[n

ADRI^NA FAORS ND MOTION FOR PRO'OW ORDEN TlrE norion 6 illcd wrthrn three business da-vs ol Plantilfintervenoas \o1rce, accord'nglv

ths MoLion oblectlngLo Lhc datc, Lme and plaF lor the deposiLion hcrebl au'onalrcallv sLavs

rhe depos lronunLrltheMo oncanbc rulcduponbl lhe coun S?g Tex R Crv P 194 4

Funhc.. rcounhas dscrcion roDrokcLlpaityrvithaProre.lrlcorder TexRcrr P 192.6

,4€han I M.!lhahy199S\1t 2d s580.551(TeY 1990) A coul lEs thc aulhonrt b I'mn

rhe scope or distrbuhon ofdiscovery based onLhe.ccds and c,tumsances offie cde sde

'lhc DcfendanL dks lhe Cou fo. a protscove ordd bscause Flotes dcPostron requesrs at

unreasonabb cumulanvc and dupLlcatile TexRCi!P \92 4ln)', sle be\ter & Prtcha"t

PCr.Jor,rD,,l6?Sw3d460,166(TexAtfltouslonll4$DisIl2005,petdeniedl Ile They $tre depos'Lr.ns properlv nouced by

rhe Ddttndan n lh$ crsc and sened on au p.nies. Including counsel for Florcs l;lores

cou el did nornle adolioo lo qu6h he deposhons and chos not to altend thedeposiLions

Indeed. Florcs' counsel cotrld have arLcnJcd the deposnions \rhen dll orhcr counsel Nerc

prcseDl and asked anyque$lons thcy had al thallrnc Thev simflv chosenoLtodo so

ln addilon. Defenda.l dks lhe Couir for a poLecrivc order because Florei deposition

rc,tucss are harassineand amotine llorcs Dd hcr couNelma-v snpb read Lhe ftascnpr -1cx olrhePlann ls deposnLon lo oblarn ady infomatron rhcl mav necd RCrvP 192 6(b)

Rather lhan,lo so. howcvcr, lhey are exl)eclnglhc pmrcs to spend anotherdtv In dcpostrons

n dupLcalrve a.d cunuhtrle deposllrons al lhc cxpense ol lhe olher pMlcs

DrllND1\r\\torror roa!3soD rroD sYI\rLNtNoR_PL\^frfll\tLRra ROTAOF'ORb'R I I A coun has broad discrctron to proLect a peson with a proteclrve order See TcxRCrvP

192.6(b) coun can (l) Pohib,t rhc drcovery soushr Lnwholeo npan, (2) I'nrr rhe exknl ^ orsubcct mauer ofdiscolery. (l) order thar discovery.ot bc underhken at the hne or place

speofied. (4) e( rems or cond,nons on the discovcry, (5) order de resulls orthe dMorerv

lobesealedoroLhcMiscprolccled,and(6)nrakeanyolhero er in fie imcrcn ofjlshce ft 12 Fo. rhc resons descnbed aborc, Dclind.nl 6ks the Coufl ro sgn a protecnve ordef Lbar

prohrbrts the dddr'odal deposition of SlephD'e Rros

wHER'FORE, PREMISES CONSIDDRDD, Dclenddl, Andenon Colunb'a conpanv.

Inc, 6ks tbN Coud ro qudh InlcNcnoFP arn,fa Mfi'. Adriana llores' DeFosnon Nolicc of

Srephan,eRros and aho 6ks the Coun bsct this molron forprorecrvc order Ior heafns md, altcr

hcdine,lo ksuc ar order proh'btring Inle(enoFPlalnlrrTfrom noticins lhesc depo$tons a' anv rme

,n lhe tururc, od lor such olher and turthcr re|eflo which DcfendanL nray be enlitlcd, crther al LarY

TIIIi WILLIS LT\W GROIIP, PLLC

$ILLIAMCLAY S@rc tsarNo 04132425 JAS S. BR,{ICH slale DarNo 24031193 IiIRK D' WILLIS Slalc Bar No 21648500 10440N Cenlral Dxpre$wav. surte 520 Dallas, Texa ?5211 TelePhone (2 l'1) 716_9'lll !rcsimlk (214) 716'9994 Scrvice Email: scn ice@thNillislerg.ouP..om

A'ITORNEIS TON Df FENDAN'I' ANDERSOT_ COLII\'lBIr\ COMPANY, lnC DrF.NDr\r\\loror roar \su DE CERTTflCATE Of SERVICE

on coNel l6led below h a mener @ns'stenl ut

nn Fa6ahil.. (956) 261'17t0

TTIEL IIRM O! ILOR E ILORES 700 N.1106 Street, Sdne E Rio cmde c'ry. Tx 7E5E2

V'd Fotinile: (713) 739-I0Is

THE I,A}EZE IIRM, P C. l l3 Vine S rrct, SuiLe I00 Hoslon, TX 77002 A t n ey Io I P Io I h rn/ P tai" nfJ n t. n e n o rs G o n. a I ez

na Faimite : (9t6) 487-6J3 6

Th€ t2wOff:ceofc beno Falcon, PLLC

McAllen, TX 78501 ltbmert /o/ lntenercr MMo Adnma Flores

JAS S, lRAlCIl

D$ENN\MMIONTOA A DETCNDNS OF SEENE RI6' NOTI@ D! IIEAENOR'PdfM MAL tulN FDnB^NDMdioNrcRP Pac.5 cAUSENO, DC-1J-971

SUCO A!!\UL J& ST TPEAN'IE RIOS 5 IN TEE DISTRICT COURT Atrd ARIEMIO RIOS, JR,,lDrthtdur(vao{t S Ob Behrlfoftb€ Ensre ofAXTEltllO RjOS, S Prcihlt|t , s $ s ! $d JO$-N GONZAIEZT S RNMESGONZALEZT S s s 331" flrDtCL{L DTSTRICT III.ARL{ MAGDAI,ENA FI'RES, AS i NEXT FRIEND OF AMY DEL CARMEN $ Rtos, A tdl\oR CEILD $ $ s \ MARIA ADRIANA ILORFJ, hdiddually S InbutPl4irnills .. s S

5 ANDERSON COLUMBLA COM!A]\Y,INc., E € D.Jend,nl a stnrn courrv, rrx,rs ORDER GR,{NTINC DEFEADANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE MAIILA ADRIANA FLORES INDI\4DUAI- CAPACITY'S PLEA IN INTERi'ENTION

OD Augle 5, 201 5, cade on ro be he.rd Dctddars Moho! to Srite Msja Adrim noB lndividud Cap&iry's Pl6 in lniadmtior Tbe CoM ha co.sidftd the Morbq ltmrd ud rhc

respo$e ud eeldeE ol coucl dd tEds tblr lle MotjoD sholld be GRANTED.

lT IS THEREFOX! ORDIRED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED rh4 Defhddrs Mo6oo

to Stil€ M&ir A&i@ lloG Individuol Capaciryh pt.a n br ntio. is i! oI dinss GRANIED Md that her ?lea il InrerdtioD is be!€by ,lisbised.

SICNED ftis I I th d.y ofAlsus 2015.

ODR GM,WG DISEMAM'S MO'ION M SME \,'fu ADfuANA FbiES IDMIT o^r-(* ofser

Frord (9$)263-t750 F.o-t oa/17 /2t_15 22io5 #593 P.OO2/AO2

Roel "Robi,e" Soroh Wllliqghom Flores A.itorney-f.4 .A.ftcrney*Mediafor sorohfloreslow@ott net

F.L.,_CIEEH

August 18, 15

Flor E. Flore 700 N Street Ste E Rio Grande , Texas 78582 Fax:956. .1750

RE: DC-1 1

Dear Mrs :

, please find the following dates to proceed with the depositions of Stephanie Artemio Rios, Jr., and Hugo Alaniz, Jr., the dates are as follows:

25th afternoon, August 28th afternoon, September 1"t morning/afternoon 2nd morning.

be advised in the event you failto respond to this request I will prepared the notices per my convenience.

you have any questions please feel free to contact the office.

W'" Roel "Robie Flores Attorney at

RF/II

cc: Gilberto alcon \-- Rene Fax(956 487-6336

O: 956-63:-7188 335i N. Wure Fld. F: 956-631-726& McAlien, TX 78501

A8/L8/2015 10:08AM IJob Number 7645] Aoooril Fram: Oa/17/,F15 22tO5 r+593 P.OO1/OO2

Roel "Robierl Soroh \r/ilfinghqm Flores Attorney-Medi Atiarnev-Medic*ior ,ssro hf loreslow@ctLnef

FLCIFIEEi A'I?AslhJ€Y& ]aT LA\JrJ

FAX,COVER sl{t=ET FROM: i , :r ,.. ::: ll.::: I ,,li : l:.

ffovzs. .

,',RoeJ lRobie'1:Ffores/SarahW.'Flores a 3- ifsD FAX NUMBER:

TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET:

CAUSE NO:

lN 'lHE MATfER oFi t\ {J -[3- '<1 I }Zir-,r a Ittth,n$, In the Interest of l :( 33 E un,cerur EI ron REVTEw E purnsg coMMENr D plels;r trptv E plEnse REcycLE NOTqS/COMMEN

IF.THERE rs,A oEltM wtrH THfs TRANS,MTS!tOil,'pLEASE (oNTA

Original to follow Mail tr YES ' :.,e1 NO

Q:936.b31-7lBB 353tr. F{, Wore ,Rd. F: ,956:63'r-2268 McA.llen. {X 7B5Sl

08/78/2015 1O:07AM IJob Number 764d1 @OOOf ctAUsE i{o, PR-14-016

IN THE ESTATE OF s IN TIIE COUNTY COURT AT LAII s ARTIIfIO RIOS, $ SnTINGr\S A PROBATE COLRT s DECf,ASED s STARR COUNTY, TDXAS

APPLTCANT'S IIOTION TO Ql,'.ASlI DEPOSITION OF STEPII \IE RIOS, ARTEMIORIOS, JR AND TIUGOALANIZ & MOTION FORPROTECTIVE ORDDR

TO TEE HONOR{BLE JUDGE OFSAID COURTJ

COIIES NOIV, Apphcml STEPHANIE RIOS,loLncd by AR'l ENllO RIOS, JR. and

IIUGO ALANIZ, and nle lhis Morion ro Qudh Inlervenor ILARIA ADRl.l\1 FLORES' Nonce oflntenflon to Takc thc O.al Dcpositrons ofSrcphd's Rros. Ancnno R'or, Jr md Hugo Aldn,z and Motlon for ProreclNe Order, and $ould show unto rhk Coun as lollols L Motion to Ott4h

Applcant STEPSANIE RIOS contends thallnteflenor NIARIA ADRIANA FLORES N notcnLitlcd to hkc Lhe dsposilions ofAppllcam STEPHANIE RIOS, An'rENrlO RIOS, Jn. or HUGO AL NIZ. [t-^RL\ ADRIANA I.-LORES nled a Peulion In Intenenlion Inleryenor iorDerenninationofRiehrollnherileceonAugusll.20l4. See 4ta.hed Erhibir "A " h h6 been ovc a year $nce the Inrercnor Ilhd hq Pqrlron In Inlcrvcnoon dd dunne lhar penodof hq several heanngs $€re scbeduled m rh[ case, all resetat InLeNenoas reque$ upon $rrncn or oral Modo.s for Conli.uanccs During rhc Lnnc of filn-e of lhc lnrcdcnrion on Augusl l. 2014 tud today s darc, ,\ugue 23, 2015, Imurvcnor hds cnsascd n absolurcly zcro dscovery and h6 or y caused lhN proceedurss robe delayed, resulln-srn prejudrce roAppllcanl OnAugusl20,2015, Lbe paroes entered dd thN Coun $g!ed a DockeL ConlJol Order nro selurg rhh mattcr on ns dockcr for a Sp.o.l Jun Trirl sl forSep(en'ber3.20ls nl9:00 r.p

Sad Dockct Conrcl Ordcr scB all dcadlincs, lrcludrng thc dcadlmcs to complctc dNcovcry, as per lhe Tex6 Rules ofCrrlProcedwe See didched Exhibit "8." Texas Rule ofclvil Procedure 1992(a) spe.incalLy slales that nr o,nl.lepositiot nn6t be hken tunnB th. tLsco,ery p zdrt 'Ihc dfcorcrypcrod, gcncrilly, bc-q$ thc darc acausc

$ nled Md ends lh'ay (10) days before lial Tex R c,v P 190:l(bl(l)G) and (b) A l'l'em,s farlue 10 d rsendy use dre rules ofcNrl procedure for d6covery purposes Nrll norrusrrry rhe

eranrlngofaconhnudce.S/arsrlyaa.lAilDistnbntihg,lrc.15lSW:d86:1,865(Texl9E8) lunnehorc, rntcrvenor ha lirted to co.ter $1n counsel .egardhg rbe ^ppxcant.s scheduhngofdepostio6intbismaller A(omoyRoct,,Robie,,Floresscn!Apptrcanascounsela lerlcrrequcslrnBdeposnrondaresforlhedeposirions ofsrephtureRios, Aneh,o R,os, Jr Dd Hugo Artu'zon Augusr 18,2015 Ar lhe tineofsd corespondence, auorncy Roet ,,Robie,, Flores had nor enreEr an appedece D oB mdler and befoE this coun In fact a omel Roet ..Robte,, FloEs entercd !n otficEl appeanncc in th6 nrancr at I lu pm on loday s daE Addrlronaly. anorher Roel Robre Florcs senl eid norice rnan ancdpt ro schedute d€pollonsoflheabovc- nrmedpaniesncaDseNoDcB-9?l,r$ongfutdcxrhcaefilcd,nthclSliJudlcratDsrflcr CounofSratrCounfr, r'ex6 SeedltachedE\hibit,,C.,,tnre}cnorhasaheadybeenshckenas .pn!hrhatc6eaneraheanhgonaMorronrost.ikehermrervenlrod Moroler, tnrcryenor norrccdlbe deposrljo. ofHLgoAtanrz, rvho r nora parl,rn lhis dse, by seryns nouce ro Applicant s ca\nsct Sce aha.hed Exhibi,D,, Inrcflenor h6 faited ro conply wrlhthe Texd Rulcs ofCrvit procedure r norrcing tnc deposlron or Hugo Alanjz, a non panynlhrcsc Tex R Crv p t914(b)(l) Appticanl tun.er conten,ls rhaL rtugo Atar 6 nor o heir oftheenate ofAnenno Rios, deceased, and B nor ctarmhg ro have D rdre.est tn rbc esa|e sublecl 10 lhis surl Horvcver. wirh resards to Fugo Aranrzs deposlron, App|canr tunher .onlends thal lnlenenor has had over a year ro conducr dNcovcry and oeposc \vtrnesses ad tilted o exercAe due drlgence ndoingso Thc deadlhes for drcovery havc passed and no asreenrenb \rrc reached rceardng lhe deposttrons ofApplca Sletanre Rios. Aft€nro tuos, Jr or Huso Aldnu Texas Rules ofCrvrl procedurc requtrcs an asrcchcnr ro excnd dbcovery deadlqcs 10 laxc 'ieposnons be inwrhng, olheNjse rt 6 no erforceablc fex R Clv p ll Thcre $"s no such agreement reached ln th^ case

Thr moronr fitcd snlji. rhree (l) burne$ ddrs ofrnrryenols Notice,,ccordinetrr dis moron objecrrng ro rnc dare, rime, and ptace for rhe depos(jonhetab\ nntohnticnt, ,fiJs I /?p"ritd, until theDo(ionca. be nrled upon by lhe Coun Tex R Crv p 194.4 U. Monoh nn ptutedi,e O rd Fudher, aCoun hN dacrcrron to prorecl apany uLh a prolecrve oder Tex R Crv p 192 6:Lreb.n t Mc han',,198 W2d 5580,5j3 (Tex 1990) A Coun has the authornyto |Dtr S Lhc scope or dEtrrburonofdncovery based or rhe needs md orcunst nces ofrhe cde Ter R

Apptrcmt sks rhe Coun for a protecrrve oder becduse tnrervenor,s deposnron Equesrs dc unEasonable, noqced after the deadtine for djscorcry pascd, and no agFemcnt w6 hade prorlolnenol'.€loallowfordrscovcryanertlEd$coverydcadtjnes Interyenor fdrled roexercNe duedrligenceinconductrngandengagingindrcoyeryMrhnrhedi$overydeadln$ Morethan one (lJ ycd hd p6ed since InLervenor fited an Inrcrvenlion D rhis nancr ed farted to conducr any dEcovery wlaboeler Now (l) bL6iness days before the l.rat. Intcneior lhrce nolices deposuonsol Applicot, Arlemio Rros, tr and HugoAlanrz, d mun-pdLy In rn6case A Coun ho broad dBcrelron ro protecr ape$onsrrh a prcrechve order Tcx R Crv p lt26{b) ACou cm(l)prchrbirrhedNcovc.ysoushrrnwhoteorrnpa(i(2)lnirlheexrnror ebFq dafts of dNco!€ryt (3) ordcr rhar d$covery oot bc unden3ken ar fie hmc or ptace spcoind, (4) st lenns or condrrions on rhc discovcrr, (5) order rhe resulrs oftjBcovery @ be sealedorotheNrcprorecled.and(6)malcanyorhqo s rn thc jnteresr oflustice Id Forlhe rooo.s dcscribed abolc, Apptrc..l aks de Coun ro srsn a p.oledivs order rhar prohrbrslhe deposilions of Aptli.Mr Slephanre Rros, AireD ro Rros, Jr and Hugo Atmz 1II. P:!!!!! WHEREFORq PRENIISES CONSIDERED, A|plcanr STEpH,\NIE RIOS, ARTEMIO RIOS, JR, od Htlco ALANIZ ask rhis Coun ro quash the InreNeno. irLtRIr\ ADRL{NA FLORIS' deporrion nohces,ud also ask rhc Colntoscr rhs mooon forprorcclivc order tbr a heanne &d. ancr dic hednng,lo issue an ordr prchrbjhng rn(eryeno. from noLrci.g rhese dcposnon at any tDre rn rhe fulure, a.d lbrsuchorherand tunhcr relEf ro Nhich Defend&r hay beentrtled b, erther a! la\r or r cq!ity

Tsr LA\r FrRlr OF Fr-oll E. FLonEs, prlc 700N llores Sl Rio GEnde Ciry, Texas ,8i82 Tel (956)263 l186 Fax (956)261-l?50 E nJ I lnoknr$ r sJrl.ud BY /S/ILOR E. FLORES

C on'e | [ar tpp h ra' t S kphdh E R?s 60 | Sasrrtr Srreel sG. 650

Te| (7ll)739-1010 Fu (7ll)739 l0l5

BY 61E}|RIS K.JOHNS slareBtrNo 240023J3 cdcorhet Jor Apph.a,t Stephame Riat

CERTIFICATE OF SER\,,ICE

I,llorE.FloEs,hcebycerrfylharon6kthe dayotAugus! 20t5, a rue ad conecl copy of 6e latcEoinE Motion to punsh Noti.a of h,tent to Ttke t/idto ond/or Ont D.potno, of Jr.?ra,ic Rios, has been upo. rtt panies ofrccord n accord.nce wnh $e Texd Rulcs otCivil

VIA ELECTRONIC FII,NG VIAENIAIL:

THE LAw OrrcE orcrBrRro FALcotr.., pLLc

VL{ ELECTRONIC IILING vIA EMAIL: er?ih$orfi!. arot.oh,

TH! LAw OIIICE OF BALDEyAi cARa & Mh.ERvA cARzr

Rro Grmde Crty, Tcx,s ?8582

\IIA ELECTRONTC FILINC vIA EIIAIL: robi.nur6,r, ncr

FLoRrs A1'roRNrys At L^$

/S/FLOR E. FLORES IIOR E fIORES -i i 5"2,,., {

5 rx trtE aOLJHTY C s ARTE&IO R]OS, $ s DECEASED s

PETITION ]N INTERVENTION FOR DEIER[iIl!2iICN CF RJGIIT OF INHERITANCE TO THE HONOi-A3LE JTJOGE OF rilS COrj,1. I'ARIA IIAGOALENA FLORES .i AMy R,Os, A MTNOR nletuecor ne.e.. iies fiis rn:eryenr.n .1. ::i.i.. L. :erernaron oi igh! or rhner€n€ p!rsua/:t ro sed.o. 201 0;2 Code a.. resp.-+- y

STEPHAi E Rtos has acdan^pp ..r,on r\ rer.mr.e -e rce o: ins pea Dy;e.cr,g s :.ay to 1.. an...ey Fo. E Fbree ar Tca N Fjcrer sr sre. E Rro Gi6^da:Fr ;:rs 7t5e2 rlRTEBro Rlos, Jr fds nbo. aarve. oi s:a e o: oe appLrcahoi :i;r./ sTEFxAftrE R|OS pe may a€

i6:0 GLadarqpe C/.e ilo Grer.e Crt/ Eras 785a2. Amy R,rs has aj!s|ca.re rnle€sr n ihjs proc€ ne zs ?.rrid 3rc herotARTEftO RlOS ? Verle .c pi.!e, ,n rnE @ rn bee6e Oi.rre.i wa: . resd€nr 6i S6d colnry

3 tre de€re.rs tde is aRIEMto i:os :-Grer'a€d rn \6,.nkr 30 2013 aL Far64 4elgiG S!:- :ou.ry rera: a rr:. Fe rioa.dge o, app

5 M,lR A MAGOALE4, rlori:s -: '.-Fr':a.l

FIL E fn^v lXltlOR, rEijdas i707 W ZO,r Mrsslon, hiaaLg. C.unry. i3xss 7s572. AIy ruOa b

6. At th€ ire ot hrs death, dec€den: tunec €5! 4. oe6on.i pore4y to.ared :n S&tr CouV.lexes as wltas a .taim i. calre fro oc-.3_e7r 3s1r Jldicial ould.t Cou4, Sr.r CodDly, Texas.

ot e5q h6r o fie d€€dent, .nd :he t.ue i.rtd.dr cr :i6 Eppx€r o ach hek h the ec4oen! s esiare ar€ * fotlo :

1;3

I ladElltpe qtr.re. Rb cate Cn! 7a5A' F.i.ionsnrpr Sh66 or E( ! SnE.eorrBo 1t3

t7c1v! 51. Missd, T*s -4,<72 R6i€rEnship. ;ir lo Sha of r€at Frore,rly .,n Sha .f peen.t proper.y:

8. Th€ &€enr de maded o Xoonin pe.er aDd ln6t dE4ia96 rr! r6n 4qsd by

nanl

9. AJr.niidr€. boj !o or adopied ay rhe ,€.edenl hEve ceen tisred in rh€

10-.tntevenor has omtne.i rh6 iollowmg infor.naoon :eqwed by sdrois 202.@4 202.005 olth€ T€c Esble. code. fr6 t^js appti.aror none tl an apFtt€rro. fd rnderende.t adfinisvaLon E p.ndrog b€foF this coun .a6e runber, inbreacr v.5 . p5,ry in Irp aomhrErEuon prqsdings F.ayer fc, Re!.i

loi.ryenr on, €.d Irar uFon ,tet &,9, rhe coLr. r. D*rfrrne .oo establish who i5 €n:i 6i ro !.e cisvtburlic. of the 6l! ot o €nt ARTEhto RIOSi

2. temin€ and esbbjish,h. rishlo, jrner:lan€ crAfy tuOS i.3 share ofrh€ d6cecsa. e6taE uncer les6 €w. Md

3- Cral hlereno. any o! r reuer to wnd, r.r6rve4cr is enrtreo.

ResF4,tull sbr,Rei.

prge : oiS

rJob NqDer.66rr booo{ MEYeR & GUERFERO. L.L.p_

Dgrid J. G!€neb

lvo\den, TeEs 7E5O1

fHE FIAMIRIZ TAW FIRM. PLIC

C un 4 ior hr9@nor Star. Be. No.: 1€506700

Eir,4

Co-couise tD. rntery€nor S't€te Ba. No.: 24067619 CERNFrcAIEOF SERVICE

I c€r0t g$ on A.rgutt 2014 a n1g ..3 _..*

Arbmcy lor srsph&i€ R,os Sre E 1X 73s32 7@ FAxi €55)?e3-1 750 3yltil

rroD xuD.! 6r$1 0,ct0cL?_, AU0 2 0 P{(-\4.iro ?015

COLJRT

PLa L,"tFF (s)

vs.

DEFENDANT.{s) STARR COLNry, IE X,{S

nockfl cufrTFol r)Rtln

AE REMEMBERID drAt Otr

ruA,Tnat(qoeli.dr ycs B, Deedlinero r€4tr*r lorjuD: rnir cr5e L sa fo. Tntt q_-oo:_a, { PE Trid co"iqcnce tr ser fo! tP'! rrhr No!!.d LtudoD) L 'lGpornN sunNaD morions

h.rns on via.o;on,yon rrriiiiiliiG. errdispor' re strmnrry mohnsrd p(,nal h"oiDg""- d nd o* !p",d. fi;; ft c deltl,jr! 6r d.signdion or*pen wiLneses ro' DelEndr(rlrj Tal? is, lhe dernLidc lor lesigndion ofe$ft !ibqj(\ ror nr:in,,ff(.) tr. TT,CP Thede line tor lompleri.n ordftcotcD for Defcrdbr T-4( P G) n fil.dqdtjm r..compkrjo j of,l \co\rD iof P,, i( fi(sl i' 7V( p Ihe deadlidd ao' amendnen, drrl ph&rre5 rof dr D.&,du,I,tt !!cI L. The dqdlinc tor amendhenl otallplerJhE. for $c pld Dr fi O) ir: 77rt Tn. d.:,llirr ro subnrLbm.d n,on . Nrrod.(ory: Itrij1 Lj0 IRISIDNG JIJDGE

{PPRO!€DAS TO !ORM]

MME: F (S) ATrO&{EV H't FlP,.lvl. p1"LC

A'DRESS: JL 4- .T ?@a?)

S) ATIORNEY 4nen 6,zp

,7EAA /c./: (tsl) .?-7t3t Frx: &S&) Asz- a8o1 F.L."FF^ES

Slreet Sre E ity. Texas 78582 1154 REi OC-13,971

"."h":['ffiT ff.?ffi J,:,1iyl,ff Hl:,:TiT: :llil::T$i:fr :' gfi enoo ususr 2€i arrernoon sepremDe" 1- morFins/aiemoon lusld i5- 2tu sePlember mom

,.- . .Please .dvised In the eventyiu tar to,esp6.d roOIs requee Iw pepaed

shoul(, tou haeany qlesrions ptease tee iree {o conbcrlh€ oft@,

"ryv - 4,4 l{.za, /44--

Far(g56) {37-6336 FL-'o."F"F.S

FAX GOVER SHEET

v Plar "Robie'Flore rah W Ftores

-/lsb IV '"D L l -?1 Talu,a it [\tt Fit dt 08t2f t201s

CAUSE NO. PR-14.016

s 5 s 5 5 STARR COUNTY. TEXAS NO'rICE OF ]NT.EIIT IO IA VID EO AND/OR OBAI. OEPOSIIIONOF ALANIZJR. -' i f iHl'€J5;i"#5-it1lllPi h€rarro'nev2orre-'id FrorE Fro€s.

PLEASE taKE NOTICE ltr.{ lhe video afd/or or:r uep.sltion ot HLJGoalaNtz JR, w[be €ken Fursuantb lhe provrsions ot Rutss2oo and 2o1. T*as Rlt€s ot Ctvil Procedne at L.w oftice ot Roet Rob . , Flores 3331 N Wa€ Rd, tL,tcAlten, Tqas 7OSOI . R€spondent in (he above captio^od dause wit tak6 the Vdeo ahdlor OBt Depositron of HUGO ATAN|Z JR., on Tu.sda 201 @Dunuiirq day lo dsy untitcomptered lr is hereby requesled thalrhep ainlf( H(/GO ALAN rz JR appearinsuch lhe and aa@ rorlhe purpose ofgivinghis deposiflo. h rhis calse, whr.h deposrtion, whe. hken. may belsed in 6vide.cedu.ing theh.atoJsajd c!se, and wiLtconlinue,@ day lo dat

The Fm oIRoet-Robie Fiores

Em.ir robienorsr.w@6n..er

Hon. RoE Robie Ftores sraG a.. No. 07167020 AIIo'ney IoT MARIA AoRIANA FLoRES I csrdly lhat a tfue @py ih6 N.)rtcE oF ITENT tO IA(E of THE VTDEO drqgxl.J|r4oEpoStTtONOIHUGOALAN|ZJRw.setuoDy ndd.(e6"riby LGlnle. or by ena byc€. h.it, €ruh recejDt fied reffid 2015

E aa@tstuil@h

Attoh.y lor MARTA AOaaANA FLORES SIEPHAN ,A)

2,

3_

. in prcp;;;i-;;; preFred orreview€d prqro rhs deposir,oi (h€ bsss oi(his rawsuir, ili;;;iJ,li;. Driver's Li.€n.e: A copy of yo!r cuftent !jrive.! 5. L@nse.

names and.d,lr€sses of Iained possessQi, cusrody, o. co.rol (t1t causE No. PR'14-015 s s s s DECEASED s STARR COUNTY, TEXAS

AMENDED NOTICE OF INTENTTO TAKE THE VIDEO AND/OR OTLAL DEPOSITION OF SIEPHANIE RIOS

STEPHANIE RIOS, Plamtiii. by and thrclgh hef allomeyolrecord, Flor E. Floes. 700 N. Flores Streel. Ste E Rio Grande CiV T€x€s 74542

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE thal ihe Vrdeo and/or Oral oeposnion of STEPHANIE RIOS wiLl be taken pu6uanl io the prcv sions of Ru es 200 and 201 Iexas Ru es of Ovil Proc€dure al Law oftice of Roel "Robie F ofes 3331 N. Wa€ Rd MoAllen, Texas 78501 Respondenl In lhe abore captioned cals€ will lake the Video and/or OEL Deposilion oI STEPHANIE RIOS, on conlinu ng day to day unlilcompleted. It he€by reqlesled lhat the Plaintfl, S'EPHANIE Rlos appea. in such trme a nd s place lorthe purpose ofgMng h6 depos tion in this cause, Mlich depos ton when laken may be lsed in €vidence dunng ihe t.ialof said cause, and wilconlinue from dav to day

Respectfuly submitled The Frm ofRoe "RobE" Fores

(956) 631-7188 ofllce

Emarl: @bieiorcslaw@alt.net

Hon. Ro€l'Robie Flores srare BarNo 07167020 AIIoTney Io. MARIA ADRIANA FLORES

rJob ruober ?616r 6000! Certificate of Service I ceR'ry thal a 1ru6 @py of the AJITIENDED NollCE oF INTENT TO TAKE THE VIDEO AND,OR ORAL OEPOSITIoN OF STEPHANIE RIOS was seded on bv hand delivery, by fa6imile, or by email, bv @nified mai retum Eceipt €quesled each anom6v oi€cord or nyin aeodancewithlhe Texas Rules or Ovrl Pbc€durc on lhegldav

Flor E Flores 7o0 N Flores st@t Ste E Rio G€nde city, Texas 78532 Fa* 956,263.1750 Emarl:tfl oeslaw@gmail com

Gilbeno Falcon ^ Faxi(956)487-6336 Email:€neonandoqaza@gmail com

Ho.. Roel 'Robte" Flores Atlomey lor MARIA AoRIANA FLORES

r rob Nube. 7633r ao00e SUBPOENA DIJCES TECUM TO THE DEPOSITION OF STEPHANIE RIOS (EXHlBllA ) The term !o!'or 'deponent rele6lo STEPHANIE RIOS Ljnl€ss( othee se specined the I'me w thin whLch maleials are soughl s the past len I0) vears Trelcms docur€rt! wr'lhos ano records ateu'sInl| s'rhibil r" lhen l:sromarr o-oaa .ense ano w lour limiraloa rhe lollowng lems '€odrdless of 'n.lloed ongm orlo€lion, whether prnred, re@rded, rilmed, or feprcduced bvanvoLher mechanica prccess or wnnen or poduced by h.nd whelher or nol clarded to be pdvieqed aga nst discovery on anyground, and whelhefan onsrnal master or copv

writt€n or Recorded stat€menl ofthe Pa.tv Proboundino lhissubb@na padY C-!.99€ !e!r!!4! any.nd a I slalements prevously made by lhe p@poundrng this subpoena duces lecum concernng the subject matler ol lhis lawsuit whch is n tha possession, cuslody, orco.tro lhe party lo *hom this subooena is drected ( Rlle 166b.2.q.). Forthe plrpose ollhE request. a sralemenl previous y hade is (a) a wrtten peBon makng . (b) a stenogfaphic mechani€|, eleclncalorother type ol r€codirq. or any t€nscriplion theeol which is a substani a ly velballm rec talof a slalement made bv lhe pe6on and contemDo€neo!slv recorded

Photoaraphs: Each and every photogEph in vour possesslof orslbject lo vour @ntol and or dlv tqllve or anv'L'r pfolog aon '''prrl he€o'rsroi :vaibole $ nrch oeoicls r"ne6 €le rs 1l Io lh6 lawsJ I Fo'fepuDo+sorlhis subpoena, lhe lerm photograph would include the video pornon oi anv mouon pElue. vdeo-lape, or other recorded medra

3. Pr€oaration forthis d€.osition: any and all documenls, repons pape6 coresponden@, pholog€phs. and nemoranda e thef i. vour possessron or lnder yolr conlo re atrng lo lhe occlren@ mad€ the basis of thrs lamlit p'epared or reviewed pnorto lhis depos't'on In preparatDn lor ih s dePosition

a copy ofyour curenl driver's rcense 5 Reports ofErpe.ts: Any and aildocuments and langible thrngs ncluding all lanqrble repofts, physi€lmodels, complications oi data, and olhermalenal prepared by an expeftwho may be called as a. etp€Ls lrialor deposilion i€siimony, and anysuch marenalprepared bv an expert used ror consullaron

lnvestioator's Reports: The nafre a reDorts ofany private lnvesliqato6 empioved bvvou in @nn€c1ion witlr lhs ese a Panies and wltn€sses: The names and addfesses ol anvpotenla partiesor witness€s lhatcan be oblained ffom any comfrunication orolher papeB In you possess on, custody, of conlol

LrqD .rb-A.76d6r 6ooro causE No. PR-la-016 IN THE ESTATE OF 5 IN COUNTY COURT s s s DECEASEO s STARR COUNTY, TEXAS

AMENOED NOIICE OF INTENT TO TAKE THE VIDEO AND/OR ORAL OEPOSITION OF ARTEMIO RIOS JR,

ARTEMIO RIOS JR., P ainLitr. by and lhDugh her altornev ol record, Flot E Floes 700 N. Flor€s steet Ste E Rio Grande Ctv T€ss 74542.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE thatlhe Video and/or 016l Deposition oIARTEMIO RIOS JR. wil be taken purslanl lo the p@vsrons of Rlles 200 and 20r, Texas Rules oi Civil Prcced uE at Law otfice of Roel 'Robie Flores 3331 N. ward Rd McA len T€xas 74501 . Respondent i. the above caploned €usewilltake the Video andlor Oral Deposition of ARTEMIO RIOSJR,, on Nd

ontrnurng day lo day untl@mpleted ll is hereby requesled lhal the Pantifl, ARTEMIo Rlos JR appearln such time and plaG for$e purpos6 ofgiving his deposilion in thrs cause, which deposition when taken, maybe used in evidence dunng the tdalolsaid cause, and willconlinue tom dav

Respecif ully s!bm'lted, The Fkm of R@l"Rob e'Flores

(9s6) 631-7133 Oifce

Ems r obienoeslaw@att.net

Hon Roel'Robre' Flores stale Bar No 07167020 Atlomey IoT MARIA ADFIANA FLORES

r hh \uober 7636r o0002 Certificare of SeNice | @nfy lhai a lru€ @py ofine AMENDEO NOTTCE OF TNTENT TO TAXE THE VIDEO ANO/OR ORAL oEpOStTtON OF ARTEM|o R|OS JR, s serued on by hand delivery, bylaFimile, or byemai, by ceriified m.it, return re4ipl r€quested each anomey or re@rd orparty 'n a@rdan@ with lh€ TeEs Rltes otCMtprocedue on ther4day

Flor E. Ftores 700 N FroEs Sreel Ste E RD Grande CiV, Tess ?85S2 Fak 956.263.1750 Email:filoedaw@gmait.com

Rene ca@ Gilberto Far@n ^ Faxr(956x€7 6336 Emarl:reneodandogaa@smait.@m

nz ru," lz,-- Hon. Ro6l "Robie' Flores Atlomey tor MARIA ADRIANA FLORES

rrob Nuber zi!6r Amol SUBPOENA DUCES'TECUM TOTHE OEPOSITION OF ARTEMIO RIOS JR- IEXHIBIT "A"I Thetem yo! or'deponeni releb to ARTEIT/I|O RIOS JR., Untess otheMise speciiied lhe lrhe wilhin which malerials a€ sought is the past ten O0) yea.s. The tems document. 'w llngs."afd ,lecords'aE used rn this exhrb rn lher clsloharyb.o.d sense and Inclldedwrthout rmtalon rhe following ilems. regad ess of onqin or localion, wheihef printed, recoded nlmed, orrepbduced by anyothe. mechanica pD@ss or winen or podlc€d bV hand whelher or not claimed io be pnvileg€d aoanstdFcoveryo. anygDund, andwhetheranonojnal, mast€r,o.@py.

Writt.n orRecorded Stalenontoflh€ Partv Proooundin. this subboena ducos lecum: Anyand alslatemenls pfeviously hade by lh6 pa popoundrng lhis slbpoena dues tecum concemrng lhe sublst natteroflhis lawsurl which is inlhe possession, coslody ordnto the parly to whom this subpoena sdirected. (Rule 166b.2.9.). Forrhe purpose ofths requesi, a slalement prevjously made is (a) a wnften pe6on making [ (b) a stenographc mechanica, electrca or oth6r lype of recording. o.any lEnscnp on theeol whch is€ slbslanlrally verbal m Gcita ofa statement made by the pe6on a.d contem@.ansuslv r*oded.

2. Phoroor.ohs: Each and every pholograph in yolrpossession of subtedr to your conl.ol, and/o. any negat ve ol any slch photograph, f€ pnnt thereofrsnot avai able, $h .h depicts mallers elevant to this lawslrl. For lhe purposes of rhis subpoena, the term photograph would hclude lh€ vdeo poftion of any dolioo pictlre, video-lape, or olher recorded media.

3 Prcbaration for this d€position: Any and alldoc!nents. reporls, p6pe6, @respondence, photographs, and memoanda, either r your possessionor under your contrclrelatng 1o the occuren.e made the basis oilh's laclit, p€pa€d or eviewed prjor to thE depostrion in pepaElion for this deposition.

Orivei's License: A copy or your cutrenL dnveas lrcense 5 Rebo.is ofErp6rrs: Any and alldocuments and tafgblethings, ncLudrnq all tangible reporis, physica models. comphcalions oldata and other material prepaEd by an expen who may be.aled as an etperl's lrial or deposil on teslimony and anysuch malenalprepared byan €xpert used for.onsuhalion (even rf rt was prepared n anticipaL on of litigal on of lof lnar) the @nsuri ng expens opinions or impressrons have been €v ewed by a testitl.g expen. Invslioator's Reoorrs: The name addesses, telephone n!hbe6, and replris olanyp.ivate inveslgators empoyed byyou n conneclronwrlh this case. P.rties and Witnesses: The names and add.esses oI any potentiaL panies or w nesses that can be obtained iiom any communrcal@n orother papec In you possess on, custodv, or conrrol

rrob lulber 7o36r b0oo4 I!11 5ik > causE No, PR-t+016 IN THE ESTATE OF s IN COUNTY COURT s ARTEMIO RIOS, s

DECEASEO 5 STARR COUNTY, TEXAS

AMENDED NOTICE OF INTENTTO TAKE THE VIDEO AND/ORORAL DEPOSITION OF HUGO ALANIZ JR.

To: HUGO ALANIZ JR,, P aintiff, by and lhrouqh her adomey of r*ord, Flor E. Flores 700 N. Flores Slreel, sle E Rio Grande cV. TeEs 74542

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE lhatlhe Vldeo and/or O€lOeposition ot HUGO ALANIZ JR. wlLlbe t ken DuBuanl lo lhe Drcvisions or Rures 2Oo and 201 Texas RuLes of CivI Pocedu€ at Law office of Roel Robie' Flores 3331 N Ware Rd, McA len, TeEs 78501 . R€spond€nt in the above captloned @usewilllake the Vids and/o. o€lo€posilion of HUGO AI.ANIZ JR,, on nd @ntinuing day lo day unlilcomplel llishe€by.equested thatlhe Plarntrfi, HUGo ALANIZ JR, appearinsuch timeand placeiorthe purpose ofgiving his depos tion in thrs cause, wh ch depos tion, when taken, may be lsed in evidenc6 du.ing the l al ot said cause and will contrnue frcm day to day

Respecttutly subm(ed, The Fim of R@l'Robre" Flores

(956) 631-7188 office

Eha'l: @b'efl o€slaw@an.nel

srare Ba. No. 07167020 Anomey for MARIA ADRIANA FLORES

lrob Nubcr 76a6t 40005 Certificate ot Ssrvic. I ceniry thal a true @py olthe AMENOEO NOTICE OF INTENTTO TAKE tHE VIDEO AND/oR oRAL DEPOSITION OF HIJGo ALANIZ JR. was s€p€d on by hand delivery, byf.6rm e, orbyemail, byc€nined mail. relurn Ecelpt Equested each.ltom€y of r*od or party in a@rdanc6 wlth the Texas Rul6s of CMI Prccedure on the ay

Flor E. Florcs 700 N Floes st€Et Ste E GEnde city, Texas 73532 Far 956 263.1750 Emaif flloreslas@gmail.@m

Gibeno Fal@n

ru - Fd: (956X€7$336 ., Emarl:enedandosa%@smd @m " /1-. Hon. Roel Robie" FloEs Aitoney ior MARIA AORIAIIA FLORES

trdb rrbef 7r!61 60006 SUBPOENADUCES TECUM TO THE OEPOSITION OF HUGO ALANIZ JR. (EXHta[ "A) Th6 tem'you or'deponeft, reters to HUGoaL-ANtzJR., untess olheMise specrled rhe lime wrlhin which maieria s are suQhl is the past len (10) yea6. The lems'doclments 'writhgs and 're.ords' are lsed in rhis exhrb h rhei. customary broad s6nse€nd Inctlded withoul rmitation lhefollowing tems, relardtess of ongrn o. ocalron, whetherprlnt€d, E6rded, timed, or reprcdu.ed bya.yother mechanrcalpo@ss ofwrinen orp.odued by hand wherherornol claned to be pnvibged againsr dlscoveryon anyground. and whelh€. an ongina . master orcopy,

WrlttenorR€cordedSt.tcmgntof theParrvprcpoundtnothtssub@ena popounding lhis subpoena d!c€s lecum @ncernrngthe subject maher of thts lareuil whEh is in lhe possessDn, custody, orconlrctrhe pany b whom thts subpoena 6 drccled (Rule 1 66b.2 g ). For the purpose of rhis feqlest , a statement previolsy hade B (a) a wriften peMn makins ir, (b). sienogEphic. mechanr€|. elech€lo. olher type of record nq , orany tEnscrpl on lherml which isa substantrally vedatim recrlatofa statement made bvLhe oe6on and 6nremporaneously ecorded.

2. Photoqralhsr Each and every pholosraph in yolrpossess@n orsubjecl ro yourcont@|, and/orany negative ol ahysu.h photogEph ta pnnt thefeof is not ava lable, which depcls matteF .elevanr lo this tawsu . For the olrNses of this s-bpoera. rre tem phoroq.aph *ortd n. rude.Fe r'deo Don on ol anv mol,on pcrlre, vdeo-laoe. orolher re@rded media. 3 prepaEtion forthls d6oosition: Anyand atdocufrents, repons, pape.s, @despondene phologEphs, and memoranda. eithe.rn youf oossesson o. under yolr @n!rc| relatrns lo the occurenc made rhe basts oflhis awsuit prepa Ed or €viewed pno. b lhis depos tion n preparat on lor lhis deposit on.

Driver's License: A copy ofVo!r c!rent dnvers ti@nse R€po.ts ofExo.rts: Anyand altdocuments and tangjbte lhings. r.cludrng all langiblereports, physi€l models,@mpticauonsordala,and othermalerial prepared by an erpen who may be called as an experl s kiator deposirion teslrmony. and anysuch materiat prepared by a. expe.l lsed forconsuttation (even if it was prepar€d in anlicipaton ot ftgaUon or lor tnaD it rhe @nsuttrng e4ens oprnons or mp€ssions have beeh r€viewed by a tesiitrng expert. Inv€stidalo.'s Reports: The name, add16sses, letephone numbe6, and repons or any pnvale invesligatoG employed by you In connectio. wrth lhrs €se

I Parti€s and Witn6ss€s: The names and add.esses otany porenti€tDartes or witnesses lhat can be oblain€d iiom any communicatof or possess on custooy, or conlrcl

rrob ,ube, ?3e6r @0dd7 + A(a181tb causE No. PR-14016 IN THE ESTATE OF 6 IN COUNTYCOURT s ARTEMIO RIOS, s s DECEASED s STARR COUNTY, TEXAS

IMOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

TO THE HONORABLE JIJDGE OF SAID COURT:

This MoTroN FoR CoNTTNUANCE is brought by ROEL ROSTE FLORES, Movant, on b6half ol MARIA AORIANA FLORES. In supporl olsad motion, Mo€n(

I. Th6 case is pres€ntly sel for a hea.ing on September 1,2015, al9:00 a.m.

in SlaE Counly, Texas.

2. Movanl, co!.sel has prevrously noticed the opposing parlies in this ese, and theylmpEpenyquash€d the deposillon, argurng lhey had b*n depose

even though they were not deposed in lhis €se- Inaddiion, deposition are

schedlled forSeptember l,2015 atS.00 6.m,10:30a.m. and 1.30 p.m.

3. Movant!motonforconlrnuance6nolsoughlsolelyfordelaybd that justice

Movant p.a/srhe co-n granl rhe roi on lorconrnuan.e be qrarled.

R6sp6.lfully submlned,

FLORES ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Toi (e5€)631-7r€3 orficd Fax {es6) 6s1 7263 Fax

07167420

rrob Nurber r66dr 6ooor SaEh W. Flores stal€ Ba. No 24045340 Attom€ys for MARIA ADRIANA FLORES

CERTIFICATEIESE8!4CE I enit ihar a ttue and @rect copy of lh€ roresoins l!!!tf:!olIoBleo!!MlA!:leE has be€n etued by hand dolivory, by lacsimlle, or by cedlne! mall, relum r@ipl requesled, on lhis rhe dayorAugust, 2015 on the following:

700 N Frores slre€i Sle E Rio Gcnde City, IeEs 74532

Email;flloresla hall.@h

Far (956)4875336 EmailrEner andoga@@ghail.@m

lJob 7668t 6000! ^ub.r STATE OF TEXAS

COUNTY OF HIDALGO

BEFORE ME, the undeFigned aurhority, petunaly appeaGd R@t " Robje" Bora , wllo, by he duly h, deposed asto tomi "My name is ROEL "ROB|E' FLORES, , am a ltcnEed anorney in the Slare or

Texas and I am h€reby acquainted with the facts siated In the Motion tor Coniinuan€ |

heeby state that the racrs h the Motion lor Continlan€ ae true and corect to th€ besr

sisned on Ausud/2, 201s.

ROEL 'ROBIE' FLORES

Slgn€d under oarh b€foe me

lrob Nukf 766r) 60oos causE No, PR-1rt.016 IN THE ESTATE OF s tN colrNw 5 ARTEMIO RIOS, s DECEASED s STARR COUNTY. TEXAS

ORDER ON MOTION FOR CONIINUANCE

,2015, rhe Louil @nsdered tle Motor torconnnLance ol MARIA ADRIANA FLORES. Movani andordeB:thal lhis Mouon is GRANTED and tT

lsTHEREFOREOROEREDth6lrheheanng is resetfol ,20r5, M

20r5.

JUOGE PRESIDING

.c Roel "Robi." Ftores Fai (s56) 631,726S Email rob efl orestaw@au.f et

700 N FtoesStE€l ste E Rio Gr.nde City, Texas 78562 Far 956.263.1750 EFail:mo@staw@gmart @m

Far. (9s€)447-6336 Emarl.cneonandogau@gnait com

rJob Nurb-r 7663r 6ooor CAUSE NO

IN THE ESTATE OF 5 s ARTEMIO RIOS, 5 s DECEASEO 5 TEXAS

MOfION FOR CONiINUANCE

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

This MOTIoN FoR CONTTNUANCE is brolght by ROEL ^RoatE" FLoRES, Movant, on behalf ot MARTA ADRTANA FIORES. In suppod ot sad mohon, Movant

L This case 6 presenuy set for a Jury Tnal hea.ing on September 3 201 5 al 9:Oo a.m.In StarCounty, Texas. 2. Movant, counselhas lssued notEes ofdeposirion for rhe followrngw ness

Stephanie Rios. Adenio Rlos, Jr . and Hugo Alanrz Jr. and are eheduted

lor Seplember 1,2015 al9.00 a.m,10130 a h. and 1:30 p.m.

3 Movanl, counsel is requesting addrhona limeto prepared fortnal.

3 Movanlsmotonforconllnuanceisnoisoughlsot€tyfordetaybdthallustce

Movanl p.als lhe @un grantthe motion lofoontinlance be granted

R6sp6ctfuily submrtted

FLORES ATTORN EYS AT LAW

Ter: (e5€) 631 7133Oflrce Fax (s56)631-7263 Fax BY:

Sble AarNo.07167020 Sabh W. Floros srate Bar. No 24045340 Anorneys for MARIA AORIANA FLORES

CERIIFICATE OF SERVICE

l@nifylhai airueand corecl@pyof lh€ fofego ng MOTION FORCONNNUANCE has b€en eNed by hand deliv€ry, by facslmie, or by certili€d mail, €turn €ceipt Eque(ed. on rhis lhe Al day orAugusl, 2015 on the followinq:

700 N Flor6 Slr6etSle E Rio GBnde Cay T.xas 78582

Emairfiloreslaw@ghail.6h

Ehailx€neorlandosa%@shail.com

rJdb Nurber 7313r 40003 STA]E OF TEXAS

BEFORE ME the undgr€igned autho.ity, peBonat/yappeaed Roei. Robie" Ftores

, wlro, bym€ duly m, deposed as folowsi

'My name is ROEL "ROBTE FLORES, I am a ti@nsed ailorney in rhe siaie of TeB and | .m her€by acquainied $th th€ facts staled in the Moflon for Continuan@. I

hereby stale lhal th6 f6cts n th6 Motion tor continuan@ a.€ true and 6red to the b€st

Siqred on Aususl ,2015.

ROEL'ROBIE" FLORES

Sjgned under oath beto€ me IN THE ESTATE OF IN COUNTY COURT 5 ARTE |o RIOS, 5 DECEASED s 5 STARR COUNTY, TEXAS

N MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

2015. rhe coun consid€red lh€ Molron forcontrnuance ol llrARlA ADRtAitA FLORES, MovanL and odeEi thal rhrs Motjon is GRANTED and tT lS IHEREFORE ORDEREDtha hehea.ing is €ser.o- 201s,

SIGNED ON 2015.

JUDGE PRESIDING

F i(956)631-726S Email bbi€f torestawasl.,ner

70O N Flor€s StE€r Ste E Rio cEnde Chy, Teras 7OSS2

En|ail;no.€sraw@gmait.com

Ehair:reneonandogau @qm.it @m

rJob Nubsf 76d3t odoro Filed: 8/31/2015 10:45:48 AM Dennis D. Gonzalez County Clerk Starr County, Texas Lilly Guerrero CAUSE NO. PR-14-016

IN THE ESTATE OF § IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW § ARTEMIO RIOS, § SITTING AS A PROBATE COURT § DECEASED § STARR COUNTY, TEXAS

APPLICANT’S RESPONSE & OBJECTION TO INTERVENOR’S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

COMES NOW, Applicant STEPHANIE RIOS, and files this Response and Objection to Intervenor’s Motion for Continuance, and in support thereof will show unto this Court as follows: I. Procedural History

On May 1, 2014, Applicant STEPHANIE RIOS filed an Application for Appointment of Dependent Administrator in this Court under Cause No. PR-14-013, styled In the Estate of Artemio Rios on May 1, 2014. See attached Exhibit “A.” On May 28, 2014, Applicant further filed in this Court an Application to Determine Heirship under Cause No. PR-14-016, styled In the Estate of Artemio Rios. See attached Exhibit “B.” Applicant STEPHANIE RIOS was Artemio Rios, Decedent’s, biological daughter. See attached Exhibit “C.” On August 1, 2014, Intervenor MARIA ADRIANA FLORES filed a Petition in Intervention for Determination of Right of Inheritance and an Opposition to Application for Letters of Administration both under Cause No. PR-14-016. See Exhibits “D” and “E.” These matter has been set for a hearing on the following dates since Intervenor’s filing of her Petition in Intervention: January 15, 2015; February 19, 2015; March 19, 2015; and March 26, 2015. Applicant was prepared to proceed on the Appointment of Administrator and Determination of Heirship, and all hearings were reset at Intervenor’s oral and/or written Motions for Continuance, and all over Applicant’s objections. The hearing on March 26, 2015 was set by the Court to proceed with all pending matters. Intervenor again made a request for a reset and the Court granted said request, also over Applicant’s objection. At that hearing, Court instructed the parties to enter into a Docket Control Order and set the case for Trial. Applicant made attempts to confer with Intervenor’s counsel to select a trial date and enter into a Docket Control Order. See attached Exhibits “F” and “G.” Intervenor’s counsel never responded to said requests. Consequently, Applicant filed a Motion for Docket Control Order on June 10, 2015 and said motion was set for a hearing on August 20, 2015. A Docket Control Order, setting this case for a Special Trial on September 3, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. was signed by all counsel of record and by this Honorable Court. See attached Exhibit “H.” Said Docket Control Order dictate the deadlines in this case. During the time of the filing of the Intervention and the signing of the Docket Control Order, Applicant engaged in discovery, as Applicant disputes Intervenor’s claim that she was Decedent’s common law wife. Applicant served Intervenor with Requests for Disclosures, First Set of Interrogatories, Requests for Admissions, and Requests for Production. See attached Exhibit “I.” Due to Intervenor’s failure to timely respond to said discovery, Applicant filed a Motion to Compel and for Sanctions and Intervenor was ordered to respond to the discovery by July 30, 2015. In her discovery responses, Intervenor for the first time identified several witnesses who allegedly have knowledge of the common law marriage. Applicant immediately requested and by agreement, obtained dates to depose and later deposed three witnesses and Intervenor. See attached Exhibit “J.” During the same period of time between the filing of her Petition in Intervention and the signing of the Docket Control Order, Intervenor has engaged in zero (0) discovery. Now, days before the Trial, Intervenor has attempted to Notice Depositions of Applicant and her sibling, and a non-party. Intervenor attempts to notice depositions outside the discovery period and improperly served the notice on the non-party. In her Motion for Continuance Intervenor alleges that “counsel has previously noticed the opposing parties in this case, and they improperly quashed the depositions, arguing they had been deposed even though they were not deposed in this case.” Intervenor’s statements are incorrect as the only depositions previously quashed were those noticed in Cause No. DC-13-971, not in PR-14-013 or PR-14-016. Applicant filed her first Motion to Quash in this case on August 28, 2015 on the ground that said depositions were noticed after the discovery deadline had passed but also because Intervenor failed to come to an agreement on taking of depositions, improperly noticing the deposition of a non-party, and failing to meet the requirements of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure in scheduling depositions. Prior to the above-referenced filings, Applicant STEPHANIE RIOS filed a wrongful death suit in the 381st Judicial District Court under Cause No. DC-13-971, styled Hugo Alaniz, et al v. Anderson Columbia, individually and on behalf of her father, ARTEMIO RIOS’ estate. The lawsuit was filed within thirty (30) days of the death of ARTEMIO RIOS, Applicant’s father. That case was set for trial and a continuance was granted. It was later reset, and Trial is currently for October 19, 2015. See attached Exhibit K.” The parties in that suit have engaged in extensive discovery, including the taking of many depositions of witnesses and experts. The parties intend to proceed to Mediation in late September 2015, as per the last discussions between the parties’ attorneys. Intervenor MARIA ADRIANA FLORES filed an Intervention but her Intervention was stricken upon Defendant’s Motion to Strike. Although having been in that case for almost a year, Intervenor engaged in little to no discovery in that case and failed to participate in any of the depositions taken to date. Any further delay before this Court will cause extreme prejudice to Applicant, as the parties are preparing for mediation and trial in the wrongful death suit and must dispose of the common law marriage dispute and obtain the administration of the estate of Decedent prior to mediation and Trial in the wrongful death suit. II. Response & Objection to a Continuance “It is well established that the granting or denial of a motion for continuance is within the trial court’s sound discretion.” Villegas v. Carter, 171 S.W.2d 624, 626 (Tex. 1986); State v. Crank, 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex. 1984). “The exercise of discretion will not be disturbed on appeal unless the record discloses a clear abuse of discretion.” Id. “It is also well established that the failure of a litigant to diligently utilize the rules of civil procedure for discovery purposes will not authorize the granting of a continuance.” Fritsch v. J.M. English Truck Line, Inc., 151 Tex. 168 (Tex. 1952). “A trial court will not be required to grant a motion for continuance, at the risk of committing error in overruling it, when the allegations in the motion examined in light of the record show beyond cavil a complete lack of diligence…” Id. at 858. “A party who does not diligently utilize the procedures for discovery can seldom claim reversible error when the trial court refuses a continuance.” State v. Wood Oil Distributing, Inc., 751 S.W.2d 863, 865 (Tex. 1988). Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 247 states that “[n]o cause which has been set upon the trial docket of the court shall be taken from the trial docket for the date set except by agreement of the parties or for good cause upon motion and notice to the opposing party.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 247; Tex. R. Civ. P. 251. The rules further state that “[t]he failure to obtain the deposition of any witness residing within 100 miles of the courthouse or the county in which the suit is pending shall not be regarded as want of diligence when diligence has been used to secure the personal attendance of such witness under the rules of law….” Tex. R. Civ. P. 252. Rule 252 further requires that “if a continuance is sought to depose a witness, the motion must include the following information: 1.) the witness’s name and address (street, county, and state of residence); and 2.) a description of the testimony the witness will probably give and what the party expects the testimony to prove. Id. Furthermore, in Wood, Wood asked for a continuance…to take depositions of the State’s witnesses. State v. Wood Oil Distrib., Inc., 751 S.W.2d 863 (Tex. 1988). Wood had not conducted discovery during the two years in which suit was pending. Id. The Supreme Court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion because Wood did not prove diligence. Id. The Court said that Wood’s inability…to take the deposition of State’s witnesses was ‘a predicament of its own making.’ Id. Like in Wood, Intervenor’s petition was filed over a year ago. During that period of time, Intervenor has failed to conduct any discovery. Now on the eve of trial, Intervenor attempts to notice depositions, after the discovery deadlines have passed, and without proving any due diligence in attempting to conduct discovery or procure depositions of the witnesses. Moreover, Intervenor’s motion for continuance is not in substantial compliance with the rules. Rule 252 requires that “when requesting additional time for discovery, a party must fulfill six requirements under oath: 1.) the testimony is material; 2.) proof of materiality; 3.) show of diligence; 4.) cause of failure, if known; 5.) evidence not available; 6.) continuance is not for delay only but so that justice be done. Tex. R. Civ. P. 252; Verkin v. SW Cent 1, 784 S.W.2d 92 (Tex. App. 1990). Intervenor’s counsel filed a motion for continuance and attached an affidavit to said motion. In his affidavit, Intervenor’s counsel simply states “I am hereby acquainted with the facts stated in the Motion for Continuance.” The motion itself states that “counsel has previously noticed the opposing parties in this case, and they improperly quashed the depositions…” It further states that “depositions are scheduled for September 1, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.; 10:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m.” Applicant contends that Intervenor failed to comply with Rule 252 in that she has completely failed to show any diligence in obtaining depositions within the year that her intervention has been pending; has failed to completely state a cause for her failure to do so; has failed to show that evidence was not available during that year; and has failed to show how her request for a continuance is for anything other than to delay the case and cause prejudice to Applicant. Intervenor has further failed to state in her motion for continuance “the type of information sought” in the depositions she attempts to notice. Gabaldon v. General Motors Corp., 876 S.W.2d 367, 370 (Tex.App.—El Paso, 1993, no writ). Intervenor’s motion for continuance also fails to state that the discovery period has expired. Intervenor’s motion for continuance is devoid of any showing of due diligence in procuring depositions of witnesses in this case. In fact, Intervenor has failed to satisfy the requirement and describe the attempts she has made in a period of one (1) year to secure discovery of evidence. Applicant STEPHANIE RIOS will be prejudiced with the granting of a continuance in this case. Applicant is preparing her wrongful death suit for mediation in September 2015 and Trial in October 2015. The delaying of this case will prevent mediation and trial to proceed in her wrongful death suit. Intervenor has had more than sufficient time to conduct discovery and obtain evidence to prove her alleged claim of common law and has failed to do so. Applicant has diligently conducted discovery, secured evidence, and procured witnesses to dispute Intervenor’s alleged claim of common law marriage to Applicant’s deceased father while Intervenor has caused nothing but delays in these proceedings. III. Prayer

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Applicant STEPHANIE RIOS, ask this Court to deny Intervenor MARIA ADRIANA FLORES’ motion for continuance, and for such other and further relief to which Applicant may be justly entitled to, in law or in equity. Respectfully Submitted,

THE LAW FIRM OF FLOR E. FLORES, PLLC 700 N. Flores St. Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 Tel. (956)263-1786 Fax. (956)263-1750 Email: ffloreslaw@gmail.com

BY: /S/FLOR E. FLORES Flor E. Flores State Bar No. 24065235 Counsel for Applicant Stephanie Rios

LAPEZE & JOHNS, PLLC 601 Sawyer Street, Ste. 650 Houston, Texas 77007 Tel: (713)739-1010 Fax: (713)739-1015 Email: chris@lapezejohns.com

BY: /S/CHRIS K. JOHNS Chris K. Johns State Bar No. 24002353 Co-Counsel for Applicant Stephanie Rios CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Flor E. Flores, hereby certify that on this the 31st day of August, 2015, a true and correct copy

of the foregoing Applicant’s Response & Objection to Intervenor’s Motion for Continuance, has

been upon all parties of record in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING VIA EMAIL: gilberto@gilbertofalconlaw.com Gilberto Falcon THE LAW OFFICE OF GILBERTO FALCON, PLLC 320 Lindberg Ave. McAllen, Texas 78501 Attorney for Intervenor

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING VIA EMAIL: robieflores@att.net Roel “Robie” Flores FLORES ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3331 N. Ware Rd. McAllen, Texas 78501 Attorney for Intervenor

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING VIA EMAIL: garzalawoffice@aol.com Minerva Garza THE LAW OFFICE OF BALDEMAR GARZA & MINERVA GARZA 200 E. Second St. Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 Attorney Ad Litem

/S/FLOR E. FLORES FLOR E. FLORES LBEoruro-/*

l

.AUSE No. fl '* [L/^e I DENNI$ nv' Ai]n c0. TX

iIN'THE IIS]'A'|E O}' 6 u, couv2:$ RT n

ARTE1WIO ruOS. E AT woF $ Deceosed R STA COI]NTY. TE.XAS .A"PPI,IC.4, FOR INTMB OFD NDENT ADMI]:{IST TO TIilE HO,NORAI]]LE JIJDGE OF COURT

coi'{Es NO\4/, STEPITANIE LEE RIOS. A icant, and files tliis A lication for Approiirtnir:rLt o1'Depe.'rlerit Administrator of the Estate o RTEIVIIO RtrOIi, Dec ased. and for icar-rse rrr\. fnltn*,i... of actLon vlill show unto this CoultI rlrc r.vtrvYYlllE;.

tJ, i

i

l^ I Appirc;ant is an individr,ral domiciled in and resid at 1830 Guadalupe S , Rio Grande 1^' , .ir Ulty, lexas 78582, Starr County, Texas, and is acting i this matter by and tlt Lrgh heL duly .r I

authorlzed rel)resentatir/e, Tlie applicant is the c'leceden daLrghtel and hzrs ar.r terest in the iestate of AR.TEItdIOT R.IOS, Deceaseci.

il. i

Derre'dent die,J on November 30,2013 in Rio Gra : City, Stalr County, Te[as at the age iof 39 yearsr, T'he decedent died inrestate. I

ilL I

This Cour:t ha.s jr.rrisdiction and veltlle is pr.oper. be .rse A|I'REMIO liiXOS lDeceased was at the tine of deiith in CoLrnty. I ltaru I

IV, I

Deoedr:nt owned. property described generally as I propelty with an unkr]own value at the time of filing this appiication.

' Decedent owned property describecl generally a rersonai propertl, ovitfr lan unknown value ait the tirne of filing this application, l I

Apftlicant, on behalf of Decedent, frleci a vwoltg cleath sLrit clui.e,ntly nincling rinder Cause No, trCl-l '.)-g71, in the 381,r J'dicial District CoL, Stalr Cor,rnty, Te>

r i iofshins to de,ceden of each heir to

EPII4NIE LEE RIOS (Daughter) ei 181 ngle ] ,

130 Gu{datulpe St, o Granfle City, Texas 7glg2 I .:' Couirty,'lexas i

.\ /) io Rros, JR. (,sor) Lza l i

ol t: 0 Guapdupe St, Grande Ciry, Texas 7g5g2 Coufty, liexas VL i' .[ar as $nown by the applicant at the time of tf fiiing of this appljcatio . the follor,ving rresunflibly born to the decedent, but pater.nity dispLlted: rY Rrot;

rde l

filing of this applicatio , ARTEMIO

WII, inter-Qst in Decedent,s estate requires in diate appointmeut of a Dependent or'. ,A.F.'[EMIO RIOS has diecl without lea t1g a Will. The indivicl ls uamed in lion cbrLstitute all of the Decedent,s heir.s diitLibutes and ha lour in this and agfee on the advisability of having a De ent f4,dministr.arion. PHANIE has lbde:n dr:signated by the known heirs at of lecedent to serve Dependent r, l'lie distributees request that no action aken in this Court on ation to the 1'the decedent's estate other than the return o inveptory, appraisem t, and list of e deoehent's estate and settle ail pending c. s fo4 money dam on behalf of the issuance nd service of lnity isr dis ed have beelt

to administr"ati n, and

admi strator of this estate shourlcl be given foii r1g powers: 'lake and possession of Decedent's state, including, burt perso ancl real property.

I'ay and all debt owed by Decedent at the f .eo ris death. t Decedent in any and all litigation ino ---D rol to Decedent, Decedent in litigation alising out o nt's wrongir_rl d h against any fe;ndants which may be liable to rn said wrongful death.

admi strator should be appointed inistrator. pursu t to Section of te Code. VI ERE RE, PREMISES CONS]IDERBD. EPFI NIE RIOS, Ap licant herein, th rci n be issued as r.equired by law and t appl t be iminedia Iy appointed rator o I)ecedent's estate.

fuiiy Lrbrnitted,

IRM OF FION E. FlonEs, 700 Flores St,, Ste E. Rio nde ty, Texas 18582 Tel: ( )26 -1786 Fax: )zo -1150

No,24065235 or Applicant v nr; 3:ziflLE|or*ufu

CAUSE NO. Dcfitil$ Blt IN TT.A] EST'AT'T] OF' $ IN c s AFTEIMTIO rrlo$, $ A1 woF $ Dfcerserd $ COUNTY, TIF]XAS

I llhe followin,g Applicernl STEPI-IANIE RI furnishes the {ollowing information toithe Court:

1, AR'IIIMIO RIOS ("Decedent") died November 30, 2013, at the age of 39

in fralcort Heiights, S'tarr County, Texas.

2., ,,A Dependent Administration upon t's estate is pendifig before this

Cdtut u:irrler Cause No. PR-14-13, styled trn the Es af Arteznio Rios. Itlis in the best interesit o:F thLe Estalie for the Court to determine w are the heirs and onlV heirs of the

Decederrt.

3, ,,4,ppliicant claims to be the owner of or a part of Decedent'd Estate. The

IaCt three dqpb of *re social'secr:rity nunrber of The last three digitslof her Texas

Identilit:ration Card, arc 162.

4. The rrames and residerrces of all of heirs, the relatiqnship of each

hei:: to Dececilent an,cl the tue interest of the Appl and of each of {he heirs i:r the Estate

of Decedent Dre iari l;ollqws:

Niun,e: RIOS,IR. A

Narn,e: Add:ress: Guadalupe Circle Gty, Texas 78582 Relalionship: Shdre of Real P. roPertY: (50%)Percent

ln lltt E$tnte of ltrtmtio .Rioa, DeeCenl At'pltcaH on io Deletsrine HetuehiP

0/2015 3:34Pti lJ0h Hutnber 1212] Et0001 \c Share of Personal ttoperty: (50%) Percent

5. A.t the time of Decedent's deaih, own€rd property as Iol-lows:

REA]L PROPERTY

a. f)escription: .A house properly where bhe same is the real Sitr:ated ted at 206 lMrrite Rock Loop, Rio Grande , Texas 78582 a'rrd described as Lot 47, Alto Vieta Phase Iil in pending litigation this Court und.er Cause No. CC- t3-580.

Tyrper Iteal 'V;alrte: {i6o000.00

PITILETONAL PR9PERTY

a. iDrscription: Iiurniture, , and personal belongings. 'Ilrprt: I'ersonal Value: lJnknown

b. lietdement Itoceeds from pending for the Decerlent's wrongful

a. I{arne: AilfY RIOS I).O.8.: November4,7998 A,ddress: Inspiration Rd. Mission Texas 8, At the time of his death, Decedent not nnarried. Deced,ent was the r;ubject

)n the EstalnoJ llvtemia Rios, Decedent Applicnticr:n lio l)eterrnini€ Heirchlp

?0/201fi $'35p1'1 [Jsb Number 72121 El000Z l3r YJ

miarriage whish Der:edent later disputed in the case filed underr Caube No. CC-13- 580.

tr, Al.l chillrenborn to or adoSxed, by Fravebeeniisted. Eachmarriage of]Dececlent lhas been listed.

J.0, To lhe lrcst of my knowledge, died intestate.

1.1, This Application does not omit ion reg'nired by the Texas

Probarte Clodr-., $rrctircn 49.

1)2. Ttrerewere no debts owed by that were secured by iiens upon reai

estate,

1.3. Ttrir; .,{pplication contairrs all of the ial {acts and circumstafices within

thp knowledge rurd. irdormation of the Applicarrt might reasonably terrd to show the

time o'r place, oJ dea.th or the names or residences of heirs, il: the time or place of death or

thb namen or residences of all the'heirs are not y known to the Applicant.

I,VHEREIF()]RE; PREMISES CONSIDERED' RIOS, Applicarrt. Prays

that ci.tation isstte a,s::equired by law; that upon hereof, this Court determine who ghares irrrd iriterests in this are the h,eirs; and only heirs of Decedent and their

Estate; imd that neceosity exists for an : submitted.

THE Lew oFFLOR E. FLORES, P.I,LC. 700 N. St., Ste. E Rio City, Texas 78582 Tel: 1786 Fax: t75A

e L.

No.24065235 y for Stephnnie Rios

Iitto Estete ol.hftenia Flios, a

Appticalion to Deter.filne Hehchip

0/2015 3:35P1'1 f J0b Hurnber 7272'l [fi0003 I

CAUSE NO.

IN THE ES]TATE OF $IN COUNTY COURT $ AR'IE]VIIO FIIOS, $AT woF . $ Dmeasetl ST COUNTY, TT]XAS

I, SITEPHAN'IIIRIOS, onbehalf of tlreEstate O RtO$, Appiican0 having

been cluJly s\ zorrL herr=by state on oath thal: insofar knowrr to rrre, all of the allegations

of the fc,rego'ing Appiication to Determine true;in substance and in faci and

that no nraterial. fact or circumstance has, within knowlerdge, been omitted from the

Appk:ation.

!}}VOBN 'TO AND SUBSCRIBED ME on this rhe P ? d daY of

May, 2f114 by STEPIIANIE RIOS on behalf of the of ARTEMIIO RIO5, to certrfY

which rrvi,tnerss rny hand and seal of office'

t{Alilrt 0 RooRl6ufz Notary State of T Jlbo*c.-f d\-Zgle-- Hy cornill|rlon Erplrur Jrnurry E. 2015 MvC Expires;

fr rnt fr6tu oT Arwnia.Rios, Dacvdent Spplication to DeterrrLine lleirohip

0/2015 3:35P1'l IJ0b,Hutnber 7212] @0004 Filed: 8/31/2015 10:45:48 AM Dennis D. Gonzalez County Clerk Starr County, Texas

Lilly Guerrero From: Lr3wOtlcesolOrloertofalcono loi IHb.LAWOFFICEOFFIORE Page:2110 Dare: 81112014 2:59:58 PM . **?iii:**+ri i .# it i'l*" 's*'-'.\,t :i,,tiii i:i ,i tili,rt *:i&Ltss $$#,.

Ifrl. "Y$"{iw S €':-fl + gs s1g; 'i]i+;H I k*.i i!-\lr*i \ ':rt *.',.*i;5 S*YY' # 'F" "&g L"ev.s * A gq.?"ffi ,E#i{3 ffi^!*I},$,, qr

& s-liFg: bt s,,8.fftH"fl\ rF\$. w !-nidtk.5J' q-l<}r ,e S $l "'y S:,\t$i$ )(-:' ",J $St)-V

wff E$infi ft .J*{"3$$"5SR}&SS..iffi S-.fl #ffi *i*$-3H,*ffi g.r #r$'3:_#_tr"ffiss&ffi*sss T'$ YF*# ${#S439*F"*LS -$Lrg}S,* fl}r"}:F*$S *_*:r}

Fe$&${*e& ftiiAs3}3&L,HF{-* F$*#RHS. n,$ fii*;'ili r*i +\S$\" R:$,fi$S" -& W{F}6$re.

ifiteruoeni:r *ss*lr":, fiies i*'iis ii'rt*:q=,pe*ti*r: s*# i*.l: :'r*l' l":gt$fi,Ei';:e*icx,r *f i"i*frt: *f i*ji*ritets:i+* #i'iis'"isi:rit tr: Secl?i*r: t*t iiSA *t' ttt* i:b:f *:t*s. tiq:ir*e **** ii**pe*tLiiiy tYt*i: fr^.l {{e'ii$i .i"r i:i :

'I. is['"$'m:$i$$*"*,N*H $q${i?S i.rn* f{}** salx d\F$iii{r {li-T t{:t i.}*$.*rr-'*rn*l |'d*irw["rig: i* fhin **tisn u{r$ r*rty *{} "$r}r'o,,us,# $,ii*-r l}tlti*e *i t*is $is.s t."u" il,tiir"ig .,..iJ iy:4ilri{ 'i,+ h,sg i,jtttitr,"r}*y, Fl*r F:.

.F{r*e*, *t ?r"}i} hi, $:{nr*c *it., "$tr+. f:, f{irr Gli}${s+ {,; . "1. *:.nr*.s, 7,$$$r?" $4^S,tTffiSS.{.{3 R$'#,S. Jr". ,,

h*.s fiieN:i :*"wsf',.lffir"+i selrur*l* *f {:*e n**:li*eti*s: i t)'d Sjifftrd,{F$.N,$ff F{t**W$. F{* sne.3r $s ; .*$w*c$ art his g*u$iires_$, "i$13$ {}*s.daii"*pe *i,;+ie, iq: t3rs,r:ri* rlitir, "$'c+xm$ ?ligggp. &my l'tilcrm h;r+ ix;t*"s.ticiurtui* intsr*st ft: this pi-r:c,ee*ir.rg * **."iii*{ r*rr*{ heir"+f siSTffiSS$ R*t-$.

,f . V'c*iliJtlr ixi pr*gr*r ir:: E*is **l;S h*uwi;*e * i'li w{frs CI: r*,}rcidsil}t *f .$tsiry l$*a;nly, 1-q*:rs*w, 'i.

, i!" I trm $*E:*,triE*s:t'$ r-isrit{r is .6S{FS&T${+ *cE*#c-{*$t cii*eJ ei* ${*v.em[:*r" SS.

ft E'i S, $q iFwifir*i": fimigql'r'fs. $*xr"r" {.tg:r:E :ily. T*xenr:r,

*+" T{i 'l.rr ii:'*+l h.a-r*-:wi*dg,,* ert'xp5iii*rarif, y.f:* u *',*iir ,;..ii*c* i*t*r+te+ti. i+ienrl*$ nir:l \s.'ilX.

i: " &i:i F l i{;,ffi rri II*-TS. Ft $,'\ *'}Sie,*+ L\,& *- ig !R,& F; $- Lq*" .!*p;t kle;'r* {,.:{y iq"€Y R{:SS. "e

F;aS* "i *:i

This fdwas senl' ih cFl FaxMaker fax sereL For more vrsif htp:/ ilvvw.gfi.com

L/2014 3:03PM lJob Number 66531 @ooOZ fiom LawOflices ofGiIbeNo Falcono To: THE LAW OFFICE OF FLOR E

I '-,

: !

, fs-qi{$$$ *{ i?*f Ls.*', .?*th, Migsig*. t*ide 'ty, i-*xs$ Y$*fX. &$#V R$*S is ir-:txi *!"rilid *f ****de*i er:* fuI,*ri* tvt*g* fi# i*r**q

$. ,r"r,t th** ti:ue r:f i':i* ***th, Se*e*$e*t l'*.*i *i:* F*rs*nxt pr*p**ty l*cstsd in *:**tvi, 'l*s.ua$, es wgi! *g a *lei*t in *e f\8ft -'t 3'$?i, *ffi1*' Jridisi*i *irtrict $tsrn {i.}cl*l:ty, T*x*s.

F. Ths nfffirl#$, RS*$, mx* *cJdres,$es e*f ee t!*r i$ tit* e$**cts*ss'rt, tl"r* rslwii*nsi"lip ir*rrr {* the de$edenf., enei tire true inter vti eF.}p{t*snl **"rrt *eruf't hgjr in the

nt'g **tmter fir* s$ f*ll*vEs;

lhi*rl*e: f'nh:"r {}$u uir. Ad*re*s; ;-t ii:po {i[rsle, {tis} Srande ! rffi$[$fi Ftmlr*ti*rr*hip: {iherw nf c'sa$ Br$Frerty: $iftelre *f p#r*cnal pr*p*lty:

Nlsrne. K[e*s. Adsrirese: i'J {ugte S[ne{*, F{i* Srande *ity. 1 7ffiSS* N*lmtirlnship. Sft,er* *f r*al g:r*perty: t, .$h*rs *f p*.r*on*l pr*p*rtyr 1,

hlmms: ,4,,*{rirt**s. f"t*_r &.{i**J*rr, l"exge s?? 1F,eia*$ier*,ei"ilp: iid $hare c# remi pr*Ferry: $fr*re *f pero*n*i pr*peny*:

. Tlte rietc*$$fi{ wme ict*rrisd t* Xp*hi$ aft{$ t vneff*es*.#ffis $sryngnated b5r

Ths i*iece**errt w**. s*hs*qx**"ttiy r:.:*l ti] F*,{*,-i* frieit* #mr*i&, Brt* t*.rat

svi**i **r*irinet*d <*c ".luiy 5, A*1 '1, by ct;reqri-** errfer*ci i* nleu,*g i$q. F*ge * *f

Thi s fa( was sent wih cFl Fad\4aker fax seNer For visit com

L/ 20 4 3:04PM lJob Nunber 6659I EOOoa r*l;L€wcrmcesotG'r:_:Faorc ro:rHELAwoFFrctoFFLoREFL( 410 Date:8nnq142:59:58PM

j

iill **ii O {i*r;*iy- **i-u*: s'i Lsw *f .*ierr ,I+r,:r-at3 is l,ti*rus{'r{ii l':gs h**:"1 gttt$*rrclsd l*-*.*, tfe* U[*s* i,:r$p *e a*$'rirsr *iesll] $f **r''rms]* ]ak , **f ,$irm r**-***' rr*t *#v* e*v f{rlheir isr$*ryy[ntir:ri !i'r tfrs? i*gmr*. Sa+h kn*w;.. r'; *f fi:s* r$S*.*#*r'rt *** h**rl iieted li .r*J l

$'ii ,i;,hi!'it*n b*rn tn +r ad*pl*d *"y 'r *nt hsvw *e*s'l list*d ill ihis

*frttlerti*r: *#. in{erue**r hes *mitte*J th€ f*ii*\Ming i*1 i'n,*iTi n i*q*ir-ed i:v $e*tia:rts ?**.*Sd, ] g+A.tlf$ *9 tf*m 'Y"*v;*x ffis'cCItss Ctscie. fr*nr tiris ap

J t Afr anppii*mti** f*r independenf edwi tf,s i* p*mdi,ng lrefelr* tl'llm *c.ust

u***f {he $ar,vrs r.*srs* n*rrrirar. i;-rtsrve***r nffiwscl *rrx s $*rty in t*e a$nt iJ *ntrwti*n p rrw*ee$i *g* .

*rffysr fnr Re

I 'flter*rft:re, ffir\R$Jq $6AGSALHNA F$*W6{ *e.xt frie*qi *,*i ;&'RsY R[S$- T{

Mf.NS[.{, rmwp**tf*ily roc1r.***ts t*at ft* t}Rst**s t i*{t *f t$re fitirn64 *i tf':is Fle.m ir:

$*teruf**i*$, 6fid that u6*r": finel ir*ari*$, th* c*+l;

*. *]s*fwrnrirt* a*# **ts$f$sl"i wlrei i* **iit* distriltr*ti** utf ths.* ssf.sgs $f i se**$[rtf Sffi]nH*#{ffi R$S$; l

I :i- Sruts.n'yri*m mnd *ste*liieh ihe right i:f irrix *{'&$S\$ ffi.$.*S $CI * *frsrm *f sfle

*.e*ee{[*t'x *ryt*te **d*r 1, exes isw; and

i ;:3. Grur$t i*te.nr*n*r *ny eltt'r*r reii*f t* *;*i* r [* esi!tit***^

*&sF€F*e ] i. i

Fsge$*f{ i , ir this faxwas sent wih GFlFadvtakerfa( servq For more infr n. vsit

I ro8 1 /20 lJob Number 6:653I @ ooo4 IIUIII. Li,W UI'ITAs OI OIIUETIIJ tsArcOIP IO. INE LAVV UtsFILtr Uts FLUK tr 5t1U Uate:w1lzu142:59:56FM

ftiE*S,S,rt- i-"P

**vi

THtr i*e.w F{ir.ht_ ptts

tiEgF9 {

S*-**u l*terr,s*n

Rene t".s*R tl*r-**i-r F:1t#!"Vs$"$#f Stst* TSl#i 4*d5'\i. v&fttJs ffi.i* Gr* , Tex$s f&$ffiff Ts : '{sty-swsit F***irnii i 4ffir**$ss H"r,':rg{i: ru$ogeru$wSgr*a

**g*+ € *i

This fa( was s6nt wih GFI Fa)dylaker fax ssryor. For more visit .com

L/24 4 3: 06PM lJob Number 6:6531 @OOoS i t0[[ LaYyviltcSs 0t t't|(Jelto Fatcono t0. Intr LAyy uFFtuE. uF FLUH E

SfrRT$Ff*ATg *F r

tr c*r'tl{y that *n ,s"ilg*et , ?s1d s #*frsF Sspy Sf tf'r*, *bove I

,*{q iNTSRVTNT{*N f.*R *gT€RftdI INJ F fti#$i{ri *F rtrh.ttrfrfTAf{cs rued $ cle*f{ F*r$** iistsd belcw by the

Florer*i y f*r Spmphanie Rio* 7 Islarq$lSit., $te. ff ;FI rnde fltit"y, l'X ZS5S* '!' .t' $fi) ffss*rIss F rss):ffis-17$S

Feg* S *f

This Fil Ms ssnt witn GFI Fadvlaker fa sereL For mors vsit

l/20L lJob Number 6t6E3l Eiloooe t,0r{. Llr}Y vilces 0r rril0efl(r farcoro IO- INE LAYY UFI-ILT UF I'LUI( T PAge: Il'tu uate: a1l2u'14 2.59:bg vM j ':!;. - -- uii**i$",-"lrr**"*^:- ds$t*ffiflS *'Sltlfi#* ri li! .*. i'd $f

ij

li ,iir,iii ? f{ila; *susH N*.

ifl rw *siYf&Fs #F "i-sff. {.li

*Y

&Rrffim$$# Fr iF

& luu*_ e &$?"ru **{"* fs3}" " Tffi p.s.$ Ts*se6ffi#l

JI.J!}{3H #F S,AiE} ${}eJ

N*BS lfr {FfffitrS ffiA$qft& ffiAffiruAL#&idq Fr ff;#, *s ##,x'$ 1i{if*ssrq$ tl$,&R€Y R${3$, S i

, *g::p,*inwnt herti*, e;i$ fiies tl"ri* *pF t* the a,rygr{[c*ti*n fc]f isst*€]n*e cf i

*fs *,#ffiini*tre*ipn rl, ' f*r the sstets *f , A,ffi ffir{S#;, c$ere$*'*i:i, fi*#rJ in this Scr"*rt tu$#,}- frt$,i p"*14, by s"fl'ffiFF{A\FSgS R$ffiS, ilt":sti$r'). ;*n*€ fymri*hm.* th*. f*{f+wing iori t* thr* **urt:

{}pp*nent [* e pers*n int*reeted i tirie i:**ei $**4us* shs* iw th* s'notfrer ;

, e{'!d ttpturwi gu;*r$i*n t?f A&GY Ri#S, '+ri^ro is e *e i:ter *nqi f**ir of [}erx*c{etlt. , 'i,i ...i l

: I ..1 l

;t. {,.}$}p*ffi*ftt mdmits th* el{*geti*r: ii*r. e*6ili**ti** fcir iom*mn*& *f {*$eru *,f *gl*, and dar*i[uii*; {b} thc* feet, e*owi*g j*rim+i{**Si*r'} e*d '*w.nus; n** r"tqr +urr":*d hy c{ee.wwm*S of t$re ti.me *f l

, S$wth. t]$:L*4r-l**t adr*pta t$l#s* *il*gs*i*ew *r:c k*s; th*rr': 6rewiiexf t&'elw mpg**xiti*n. ,ir ';il -.l, :l- ,'i' .'' .], $re rrle'ft*r* fq:r €he $*-:**$:t fq:* Ii $lr:**g":f ffie'lt*r* i

*Sr,,"ri9.c** *Sr',"ri9.c*S ip**tiei"e ? ebhl"er*, *pgl*nef* #*nie* .r.i.:.i ..-':i I

'iSSRsfS,lv *il ]*'lii*i. aiiwg*ti*i:s ix;*teirred !* tf:s Fi:ii**tl*c] f*r li*,rgtt**r"lr.:{s r*f i*ttgys gf rndr*lnisrtr*t6arsn allqJ. **$$encj* *{t^!*t pr**ir pf t!:+ u i*,.* **l*gettr:.s:b **r e $!r*$srl{*sfsn$e ii *uir****:*. I*f Sr"*r*ii"llq lt*c 'llll "i '":',, i I r

This fd was sent wift GFI Faldvlaker F*g*tr;fe

fa serer For moro visit lttF:/,lvlwv.gf i.com

08 L/20L4 3:0gPM i lJob Nunber 6653I E oo0z From. Ldll, Otllces 0r Gtlbsno Falcono l0: IHL LAWoF|-lch 0t- |-LOH E I PaqP:E/10 Date: 8/1{2014 2:59:59 Plvl

4. j/'dgrpii*e*t SFfftr-rtAN$ffi R$GS i$ e*jitie* t* *9 sdretnt*irmti*x $treu'* eir,$ l* disq;-ra{i$}ed ts} servs es :r=* i*r thst s*e he* s I

,*f ilitqerc*t uvi*r A,$$y ffi$#$. $T# mrr xppli*-eti** f*r I

in*{:i*ir *r" h*ireftip ssr* dtr*s **t i#**S *3'lit* fiftd heir of

srli in i*qj$*ti**. S"F#Fgd&*$*# ffi$*$ rh* 3$'l*i *ietrici *f St*l'r **e.*r"rg, *iyiet* *e**e hi,:. ili*-i3 ?1 .*$wi*g rls txltl:e wr*ngfu! {ssrit. in that prs*eecii*S $fts rS*f"r i,* irs CIs tfr* per**nat *1'the iletgf.e, w|:en in fs*t ahe ie

*{ **rr.t frissrd rsf &MY R*SS, ieci**$ fr*ir n**rt f':at tfr*i: the npp*icdrti*n f*r $u*V e,f incJlm;nlmtr*t**n. the€ lettere *f *rirni eti*rJ n*t be tr* SYHFF{.&S{Iff l*,*i*e*$ *nd ffle*t ths #'*t"r$ #f8r1t *Lj*h &tfu€r # furthfir *r#n*rw thet ff'rw ***rt *esms

i{y srlihs+it*pd: I

M*of* {}LiiF.t;{ FEF,9eft ,l A-. 1,. F;}

*svi* J.

Stste FS rd*.: t)*$S.fS{?S s*s 1$i* .S,t+e.ui,t i

Mrr4"ilx* m:seS ?-SS{i'{ ; r*sr:i m*r-dtpt Fe*sii"n!! ] #.31,.r4S$ il**':*ii:

F*ge H *f

This fax w€s sent vrifi GFI Fa)d\4akertax servor For :/ Mr'/rv.gfi.com

I/ ;,{, 3: lOPM lJob Nurnber 66531 Eil000s From: L3w Unc€s ol gtlberto Falcono lo: IHE LAWOFFICE OF l-Loll E

I +-Sts- i*uv Ft fu!, FLL*

itg* *pp*rr"i* $tmt* ,{ss*s? 8;* H. T*SSr Telep ) $$e-e #* F ] s6*"s1 n H-ryieii

"/ {*-- "tt

,Q,ene Serxs-* fipp*r'l*rr $iste 4S4 N, vefi$s fti* Sra , T*y*s rsssr Tsleph ) 4S7 iJ

F$**1ft1 .4fi;/ F-rn*ii; grweit,ccrn

Fcg* & *f

This ta($,as sent wift GFI Fadvlakgr fa( s6rver. For more .com

L/20L4 3: 11PM lJob Number 665JI BOOOS Lav{Offices ofcihelto Falcono To: THELAWoFFICE OF FLoRE |U1O Dare:8/1/20142:5S:5SpM

*HffiY*r*ff&T* *f,

*eirr**ti***v clf *pp**itia* t* i t.-_ El*rs$n "t irstss b*fCIw by t*e l

f /4

F |*t*rw$ A y fur $tephanie Kios ? Fl*rtl$ {3t., St*. H H rnde: $ity, TX 7ffsffi? Y ss) ss$-1 ?ss i$$) kP3-r7s0

Pag* S *f

This fa( sias sent wift GFI Fadvlaker fa( son/er. For more .com

4 3:12PM lJob Nunber 6i6sgl @ooto llomi Law umces 0I biloeflo Fatcono IO: IIlE LAWUFFIUE OF FLURts Date: al1(2U14 2:59:5a PM

l l

iiS.t jil{i* +j ,--,'.1.-* "*,j'4rt" .. ll;!3* '+.).Fii l"

"qss i:ffis.i r{i* ii-iei Jaritiq' i::Jsi:r't i -,--:.-*.--L-..---.,-tr'i...,i--......

-:, l:il,jji- -t - -

:,{ fr'("ary ft*vli*k\r $sfg!m*$ r.v"lt& glx*fio''** Lr3r

';.;i Air**iiqd $liqalris firr.d e ftg-si*iilp*ci c.opy I ir lr', i)f-.*i'r'etllti*n fc..r' l,)er&,rmirrgl{on

t cX l,r$*riimrlr::e And *ppc*iliir:i't i* Appii**{,tif.r i{ir j l

fd','t?iir-r1;ln/1d:! fF;,:-;+r&r fu:r' r!,?trtirilrlLil;1{in}tl$l , l(Jl scl, yq,Jrjr Jt}+i.JII"rF, !()iqr.; i| i*,/:rarr're 'i,"r ,..- riUU$; y,r;ii.!-:&' luir,ei clf tr6x*st"fi$. pi$e$s ei.* r.r*t ,l t# c,)tXdti:l n"lv Olli$+.

This fax was sent wifi GFI Fatyiaker fa setrer For more vsit h //' wv.gfi.com

3:02PM lJob Number 66531 Eooor Gmail - Rios

Flor Flores

R 1r

Wed, Apr 1,2015 at 1:56 PM

issue of a common law marriage. At the last Order and set altrial date. I spoke with Chico .I am getting ready to prepare the Order and the trial may itake at lerast two days since. I

N. $lores lSt., gte, .[i

https//mqil.go4le.$om/nrail/u/0/?r.li=lgik:=6'i'00a43108&view=pt&q=in%3Asent%20gi .com &qs= true&search= query&th = I 4c765T e50... | I 1 8130t2015 Gmait - Artemio rstate {i{s fl"$*l L*Flffi,.- i,,t i'.trojiju: ' li $ Ii i FrorFtores

l; ArtbmioiRios 1 mQssag;e Eistat,e I ]

]

Flor iFloresi .

< anrf er@)gif bertol alconl aw, com> Cc: Nadia LA1 .:floreslawassist0l@gmail.comr i l

Gilbr-'rto, Amber: I

li Oril\pril 1st, I sent both of vou an email requesting tentative tri[{ dates so we could finalize the Docket Control ordelrtlrerJudger instrtrctr:cl t.ts to submit in this malter. lt is novr{'l'rry ,3th and I have not received a response from you' I ant tequersting one last time trial dates in June tromldou'so r can get this case scheduled, lf I don,t reoeive a resp'onse, I willl r;urbmit a Docket control order wtho+i]your input. riirinX I have waited tong enough. Adpitionally, discovery responses are overdue. Please arr{vf tnis electronic correspondence to serve Yojrr as a forlnal request for res;ponses by no later than the end of the nu{iiress oay on rvonday, tVtay 18, 2015. lf I do not reoeive sqid responses, I will be filing a Motiorr for Contempt arif for Sanctions ll

Thiink yotr for your prompt ;rttention to these matters. i

Fk>:r Ii. F'lor:cs 'l'ex'as,l'4fer Lowyers - I\i.ring,\'tar.r 20/ j,ctncl.20/ 5 The Law fiir.rn of Filor E. Flores, PLLC 700 N. Florei; St,, Str::. Ii Rio Grande Cin','Iexas 7B5BZ 'l'ol: (956):Zti13-1'f86 trax: (956),lfii3-1750 $,W$'. [1]oreslaur.conl [l l o re s] :ru,@)gmar L c;o n"t

httos://mail.ooo0le-com/nrall/u/o/?rLi=!1i ift:::2/fy62431og&vie_w= nt&o= ino/nl tnf.aleonf aw nnm.tnq=trr pRcparnh=nr prrr,tlh= 1 AdAcAOaah 1 t,1 ij NrJr-c c' *o,cLooK__ d_ M

ti AU6 2 0 2015 lr i P{L- \.1- I CI.EfiK STASR CO. TX

ll

AT LAW

STARR COLINTY, TI]XAS

Iitlt zulMIiMlSERED that on ti "J day of ,2015, a docket codtrol cr:nfen:flcer was held. l

,l A. Jury T'rifl requested: Yes

B. Deadlinp to request for jury:

C. l'his case is sr:t for'Irial qloO >-rn. D. r\ .Pre-Trial conference is set for . (Pre-Trial Notbbook is mandatory)

E. l"he dr:a$line for filing all dispositive summary and pretrial motions by I)efendzint (s) is _ The court will schedule a h.earing po it,iiO rnotio* up* th" ftlirrg of ru*".

l'he dr:rabline for filing all dispositive summary r and pretrial motions by [:'laintiff(r;) is _ The court will schedule a hiearing prL said motions upon the fiiing.

G. 'Jlhe dr:rapline for designation of expert witnesses Defendant (s) tq' VfrT/ H. llhe deadliLne for designation of expert witnesses Plaintiff (s) is: TECP l. llhe dea$line for completion of discovery for (s) is: TlIC P J. llhe drlahline for completion of discovery for P ru (s) ls: t' m cp t, I\. llhe d,radline for amendment of allpleadings for l

jDefendant (s) is: TNC P TnCf I

L. llhe deadline for amendment of all pleadings for Plaintiff (s) is: , tvl. l.'he d,:adline to submit to mediation is Manda 0 F (S) ATTORNEY/

F/o, €- Fl,'"

s: 't K0 I

/1/ F/on, 8/.

/a '?56 r, (rst 2b 3 - /75,

s) ATTORMY 27- 4,rr*' 6s,zp ,41S,nn Al L,L,,t- eoo V ?p1 eeo s- an4 Sr- ?ro 1'an/, 4'an/e Cb,ru.

T4: (?sa) "":t:f: fr*, GsA) Aez- s|o{ kimail - ehile I exas.oov - hr Accepted - 4663%3

# qlr

{-*nW,,it r:,;!1tri[{ii $ Flor Flores

".-**-!****** tl .i*-----------*--

eFifeTexas.gtov ...' Iriling Accepted - 4663943 1 me$sage ***-j+-***"i-*"**** r

ttto-fignlV@pfi leterxas. g;civ < No-Reprly@efiletexas. gov> Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:53 PM To: f{f ores lairy@{lrnaril. c om l

J.tEl'lll_[ Filing Accepted [*F' IEi{ril$.gr]rr il l Envelope Number: 4663943 I

ThS filin$ belh:w v,rgs reviewed and has been accel by the clerk$ office. Be sure to click thdLlin[< pelc,ur to retneve your file stamped copy of document filed.

https://mailllioogle.cdm/mailrrr"t/O/?ui::2&ik=ir700a43108&view= nt&d= pR-1r'-16Rcq=rrr pp-c n arr t 9-th- 1 A raAEl ^/^onELA^o ^t ^r- a t ^a^E r - I

CAUSE NO. PR. i, ltu I]\ THE IIISTITTII OF I

t* THE COUNTY CO l $ $ I I

A,RfEn/nIO RIO{i $ s I AT LAW OF nnbnasin:u l $ i

i STARR COUNTY, TE I

,F WRITTEN DISCOVT]R

I t:fltvfn$ N,OW, STIEPHANIE RIOS, Appti in the above entitled and numbered cauEe, arnd pursuant to the lfexas Rule of Civil procedu Rule 191.4, files this First Certificate of Srritten f,riscovely and certifies that on this 26th day , March 2015, Applicant forwarded the n rr I

tollciwrng to opposiing counsel. l

I. .Afotrtlicnnt's Rule 194 Requestfor to Intervenor; and

2:.. First Set oJ'Interrog .Aptrtlticunt's for Adtnissions, and Requests ,fQr Production to Intervenor.

Respectful submitted,

Ttre Law RM oF FIon B. FIonns. PLLC 700 N. Flo St., Ste, E Rio Gr ity, Texas 18582 Tel: (956) 3-r786 Fax: (956) 3-r750 Email: tt] (

Flor State No.24065235 Attot for Applicant Stephanie Rios

Cause No. PR-1II-16; In the ll,state of Artenio Rios. Deceased Aprurcawr's lirnsl. rlEn.nrrcATE oF WRrfinN Drscoveny 1t

ii ii lj tl

ii VI I, Irlor Flores, hereby certiSr that on this the tn day pf March,, 2015, a true and correct of 's First CetiJicate of Written Disco werp served unto all parties of record, th the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure:

ONI

ILBERTO FALCOI'I.

Maria Adriana Fl.ores

E. Flores

-14-16; Ilt the Estate of Artemio Rios, Deceasetl Page2 of2 Irrnsr CrinrmrcerE or WRrrrEN DrscovERy Gmail - eFileTexas.oov -Fili - 6306743 lAccepted

I Flor Flores I

i-*'- I

Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:42 PM

HFlll"[ Filing Accepted TEHlffi,grlrr' Envelope Number: 6306743

berlow wQs reviewc.d and has been accel by the clerks office. Be sure to click llour to retrieve your file stamped copy of document filed. Flor Flores

Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:44 pM

filllllJ Filing Accepted qTn}fr,*$.ffw THHfi$. Envelope Number: 690731S

g filini beforrv wds rerviewed and has been accept by the clerks office. Be sure to click ri link pelory to relrieve your file stamped copy of tl document filed.

hffnq'//maillnmfonhm/mailf /..lli- dgjt.-^1 n^reinog'i^..,_^rea_Fr 4t 4^o_^_L-,,^o--_-- Gmail - eFileTexas.gov - Accepted - 6307396

Flor Flores r';{ rn x rl{L **,*]-1-.*_

eFilbTe 1 mgssage

s.99v .: Nlo-Reply@efiletexas. gov> Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:52 pM Lcofn

Filing Accepted Envelope Number: 6307396

ow!/qs rr;'viewed and has been accep by the clerks office, Be sure to click v to rqtrierve your file stamped copy oi. document filed.

m/rnail/]r-r,t0l?ui,=2&i k= a700a431 Og&view= ot&o= nr-,t4_ 1 68.os=rrr rarv 2lh= 4 A aaEo Aefrriffe^? g * _. E^^ r^ ^ ; r ^ ^^ E ^^ _ - Gmail - eFileTexas.gov - - 6307474

Flor Flores lit

eFil .-IFif iing Accepted - 6307474 1me

Fri, ,Jul 31, 2015 at 2:50 PM

Filing Accepted ll$,-$*tt" Envelope Number: 6307474

w wqs reviewed and has been accel by the clerkS office. Be sure to click to retrieve your file stamped copy of document fildd.

I lll, l

l*^- 'rt- ,^^^^, ^ii ^ ^i* ,* ^ it t,,t^t^, .l-4oit.--?,ta- ,^r na 6. .: ^ Flled: 2/1 /2O15 '| :01:01 PM Eloy R. Garcia, District Clerk Stan County, Texas

Brendaly GuerreroFiled: 8/31/2015 10:45:48 AM

CAUSE NO. DC-13-971 Dennis D. Gonzalez County Clerk

HUGO ALANIA JR., STEPHANTE RrOS $ rN THE DTSTRTCT COURT Starr County, Texas

And ARTEMIO RIOS, JR,Individually $and Lilly Guerrero On Behalf of the Estate of ARTEMIO RIOS, S Plaintffi, S s And $ s JOANN GONZALEZ, and S RAMES GONZALEZ, S $ AND $ 381't JUDICIAL DISTRTCT $ MARHMAGDALENAFLORES,ASNEXT $ FRIEND OX'AMY DEL CARMEN RrOS, A $ MINOR CHILD S Intervenor-Plaintilfs $ $ Y.$ $ ANDERSON COLIMBIA COMPAIYY,INC" $ $ Defendant $ srARR COITNTY, TEXAS AGREED AMENDED DOCKET CONTROL ORDER Feb. BE IT REMEMBERED THAT' ON 2nd DAY OF Jamuy, 2015, counsels for Plaintiffs, Interuenors, and Defendan! appeared and agleed, and the Court entered the following order:

1. Jury selection-Trial: Octoberl9' 2015 at 9:00 a.m.

2. Desiguation of ExPerts:

a) Plaintiffs/lntervenors: May 8,2015

b) Defendant: June 15,2015

3. Discovery Deadlines:

a) Plaintiffs/Intervenors: September 18' 2015

b) Defendant: September 18,2015 Seot. 4. DaubertlRobinson Hearings (if needed), ffist -\2015 at 9:00 a.m. a) Amerndment of Pleadings (Plaintiff): May 1l 10, 2015

tr) Amendment of Pleadings (Defendant): July 6,2015

Itinal Pre-Trial conference Pursuant to T.RC.P. # 166z october 7 , 20ls art 9:00 e'.m.

l\ll Motirrns in limine shall be filed and heard at final pretrial.

llrial Nolebooks are due two (2) weeks before Final Pre-Trial Conference.

llrial Notebooks shall be incompliance with T.R.C.P. 166, including special issues.

SIGITED AND ORDERED ON THIS 2 d^y o1 Feb. 2015.

Luis Garza

Keith W.lapeze State Bar No. 24010176 Taylor Shiprnan State Bar No. 24079323 Christopher,K. Johnsr State Bar No. 240021353 LAPEZTI & IOHNS, P.L.L.C. 601 Sawyer Street, Suite 650 Houston' TX:"77007 Phone: ('713) 739-1010 Fax: (713) 7'39-l0li' tay lor@ lqp4qhrm. cronn keith@lapezej ohns. com christopher@lapezej,ohns. com C ouns e I .for P I ai nt iff' / Interv enor 01/30/2015 EF1'l Ft{H S582631?50 Law Firm of E 0002/0002

rt) Amendment of Fleadings (Plainriff): M il 10,20t5

b) Arnendment of Pleadiugt (Defendant): Ju 6,2015

l'inal Pre-l'rial Conference Pursuant to 1'.R,C.P # 166: October _r 201s

at 9;00 s.m.

All Motions in liminp shall be filed and heard at pretrial.

Trial Notebooks are due rwo (Z) weeks before Final Trisl Cqnference, I

TrialNotebooks shall be incompliance with T,R.C, I 66, incljuding special tssues,

SIGNED AND ORI}ERED ON THI$ 20r5.

Jose Luis Garza 38lst Dlstrlct Ju

Kei W;Lapeze Staie N0.24010176 No. 24065235 Sfipman THE W FIRM OF fLOR E. FLORES, No. 240?9323 700 N. lores $treet, Suite E K. Johns Rio Ciry,,Texas 78582 Sti i No, 24002353 Phone: (956) 263- I 786 LI & JOIINS, P,L-I,.C. Fax: ( ) 253- 1;7s0 60 i,er Street, Suire 650 fllsr I TX 77007 Jbr PlaintilJs (713) 73e..r010 F ls) 739-10r5 LO_rn kei sJ0npurg..9a t! ohns.oom C lM Plaintiff / Intervenor L. Ramirez BarNo.16506200 RAMIREZ LAW FIRM, PLLC Hackberry Ave. TX 78501 : (956) 668-8t00 (956) 668-8101

for Intervenor

tr\ No.21648500 Braich N0.24033198 P. Geer No.00786389 Williams State No.24070854 1044 N. Central Exprcssway, Suite 520 Dalla Texas 7523 I Qt4)736-9433 t4)736-9994

for Defendant