In Re: Stephanie Clifford v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: Stephanie Clifford v. the State of Texas (In Re: Stephanie Clifford v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENIED and Opinion Filed February 1, 2024
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-01282-CV
IN RE STEPHANIE CLIFFORD, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 422nd Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 100256-422
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Pedersen, III, Nowell, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III In her December 18, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief
from the trial court’s order denying her motion to dismiss for want of prosecution.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires a relator to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that the relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy.
In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude
that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a).
231282f.p05 /Bill Pedersen, III// BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Stephanie Clifford v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stephanie-clifford-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.