In re Stephanie C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Stephanie C.

298 A.D.2d 176, 748 N.Y.S.2d 243, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9483

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 8, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 298 A.D.2d 176 (In re Stephanie C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Stephanie C., 298 A.D.2d 176, 748 N.Y.S.2d 243, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9483 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about July 12, 1999, which, upon findings of permanent neglect, terminated respondent’s parental rights to the subject children and committed their custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Clear and convincing evidence supports the finding that respondent failed to cooperate with the agency’s diligent efforts to enroll him in an alcohol program, and that he never effectively addressed that problem (see Matter of Amanda R., 215 AD2d 220, lv denied 86 NY2d 705). A suspended judgment is not warranted (see Matter of Yvonne Cecilea Y., 293 AD2d 423). Concur — Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about July 12, 1999, which, upon findings of permanent neglect, terminated respondent’s parental rights to the subject children and committed their custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Clear and convincing evidence supports the finding that respondent failed to cooperate with the agency’s diligent efforts to enroll him in an alcohol program, and that he never effectively addressed that problem (see Matter of Amanda R., 215 AD2d 220, lv denied 86 NY2d 705). A suspended judgment is not warranted (see Matter of Yvonne Cecilea Y., 293 AD2d 423). Concur — Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 A.D.2d 176, 748 N.Y.S.2d 243, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stephanie-c-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack