in Re Stephanie Anderson

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 22, 2016·No. 04-16-00399-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 22, 2016

No. 04-16-00399-CV

IN RE Stephanie ANDERSON

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice

On June 22, 2016, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for stay. The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on June 22, 2016.

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of June, 2016.

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 381055, styled Stephanie Anderson d/b/a Trinity Lace Wigs v. Barbara Technologies Corporation d/b/a Americas Computer Company, C.E.B Spaur a/k/a Bart Spaur, and Barbara Spaur, pending in the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas, the The Honorable Tommy Stolhandske presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Stephanie Anderson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

in Re Stephanie Anderson (in Re Stephanie Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.