in Re Stephanie Anderson
This text of in Re Stephanie Anderson (in Re Stephanie Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 22, 2016
No. 04-16-00399-CV
IN RE Stephanie ANDERSON
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice
On June 22, 2016, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for stay. The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on June 22, 2016.
_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of June, 2016.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 381055, styled Stephanie Anderson d/b/a Trinity Lace Wigs v. Barbara Technologies Corporation d/b/a Americas Computer Company, C.E.B Spaur a/k/a Bart Spaur, and Barbara Spaur, pending in the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas, the The Honorable Tommy Stolhandske presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Stephanie Anderson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stephanie-anderson-texapp-2016.