In re Steinert

Missouri Court of Appeals

In re Steinert

488 S.W.3d 726, 2016 WL 1757442, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 435

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 3, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103365

StatusPublished

This text of 488 S.W.3d 726 (In re Steinert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Steinert, 488 S.W.3d 726, 2016 WL 1757442, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 435 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

[727]*727 ORDER

PER CURIAM

Diane Longsdon (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Fran and Fred Steinert, Jr.’s (“Respondents’”). Respondents filed a Petition in the Probate Division of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County alleging that the trust set up by Fred Steinert, Sr. and Violet Steinert was not allowed to be unilaterally amended or revoked by Violet Steinert. Respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment was granted, finding the original joint trust at issue was irrevocable and unamendable. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[727]*727 ORDER

PER CURIAM

Diane Longsdon (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Fran and Fred Steinert, Jr.’s (“Respondents’”). Respondents filed a Petition in the Probate Division of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County alleging that the trust set up by Fred Steinert, Sr. and Violet Steinert was not allowed to be unilaterally amended or revoked by Violet Steinert. Respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment was granted, finding the original joint trust at issue was irrevocable and unamendable. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

488 S.W.3d 726, 2016 WL 1757442, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steinert-moctapp-2016.