In re Steinberg

682 A.2d 774
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 9, 1996
DocketNo. 232 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 682 A.2d 774 (In re Steinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Steinberg, 682 A.2d 774 (Pa. 1996).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 1996, Arnold Yale Steinberg having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of Florida for a period of ninety-one days by Order of the Supreme Court of Florida dated March 7, 1996; the said Arnold Yale Stein-berg having been directed on June 18, 1996, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is

ORDERED that Arnold Yale Steinberg is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of ninety-one days, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
682 A.2d 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steinberg-pa-1996.