In re Steffen

24 F. Supp. 751, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1756
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. California
DecidedSeptember 23, 1938
DocketNo. 32209
StatusPublished

This text of 24 F. Supp. 751 (In re Steffen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Steffen, 24 F. Supp. 751, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1756 (S.D. Cal. 1938).

Opinion

YANKWICH, District Judge.

The Medical Finance Association, a corporation, one of the unsecured creditors listed by the bankrupt, has moved to dismiss the proceedings. The petition here lists no assets except certain wages and articles of personal property for which exemption is claimed. It appears from the files of this court that a prior petition was filed on October 21, 1936, the same being No. 28778-M. An adjudication was made on the petition on the same day. The bankrupt failed to prosecute the proceeding for a period exceeding 18 months after the adjudication. On April 22, 1938, the Referee closed the estate for lack of prosecution. The present proceeding was instituted on June 16, 1938. The only debts listed are four unsecured claims which were also set forth in the prior proceeding. Under the circumstances, the only object of the second proceeding is to secure a discharge as to the same debts. The petitioner has lost his right thereto, as his failure to secure a discharge following the prior adjudication is res judicata as to all the debts in the present proceeding. The petition should, therefore, be dismissed. See Freshman v. Atkins, 269 U.S. 121, 46 S.Ct. 41, 70 L.Ed. 193; Holmes v. Davidson, 9 Cir., 84 F.2d 111; In re Loughran, 3 Cir., 218 F. 619, 33 A.B.R. 350; In re Elby, D.C. Iowa 1907, 157 F. 935, 19 A.B.R. 734; Kuntz v. Young, 8 Cir., 131 F. 719.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freshman v. Atkins
269 U.S. 121 (Supreme Court, 1925)
Holmes v. Davidson
84 F.2d 111 (Ninth Circuit, 1936)
Kuntz v. Young
131 F. 719 (Eighth Circuit, 1904)
In re Elby
157 F. 935 (N.D. Iowa, 1907)
Loughran v. Hazleton Mercantile Co.
218 F. 619 (Third Circuit, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 F. Supp. 751, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steffen-casd-1938.