in Re: Stefanie Henderson
This text of in Re: Stefanie Henderson (in Re: Stefanie Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed December 6, 2021
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00532-CV
IN RE STEFANIE HENDERSON, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-20-05757
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Smith Opinion by Justice Smith In her July 1, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus, relator challenges the trial
court’s order granting real party in interest’s bill of review. Entitlement to mandamus
relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and
that she lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d
124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
Based on our review of the petition and the record, we conclude that relator
has failed to show a clear abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition
for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Having denied the petition, we also deny relator’s December 2, 2021
emergency motion for stay as moot.
/Craig Smith/ CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE
210532F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Stefanie Henderson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stefanie-henderson-texapp-2021.