In re Steenland

Michigan Supreme Court

In re Steenland

922 N.W.2d 609

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 14, 2019

DocketSC: 158592

StatusPublished

This text of 922 N.W.2d 609 (In re Steenland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Steenland, 922 N.W.2d 609 (Mich. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

On order of the Chief Justice, respondent's "Motion for Additional Time for the Anticipated Proceedings" is GRANTED IN PART. Respondent shall have an additional 60 days to respond to the JTC's 28-day letter. If either party requires additional time to meet the deadline imposed by this Court's order of December 14, 2018, it may file a motion requesting such while explaining in detail the efforts that were made to comply with the deadline and the specific reasons for the amount of additional time requested.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On order of the Chief Justice, respondent's "Motion for Additional Time for the Anticipated Proceedings" is GRANTED IN PART. Respondent shall have an additional 60 days to respond to the JTC's 28-day letter. If either party requires additional time to meet the deadline imposed by this Court's order of December 14, 2018, it may file a motion requesting such while explaining in detail the efforts that were made to comply with the deadline and the specific reasons for the amount of additional time requested.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

922 N.W.2d 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steenland-mich-2019.