In re Steenbergh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Steenbergh

191 A.D.2d 947, 595 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2607

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 191 A.D.2d 947 (In re Steenbergh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Steenbergh, 191 A.D.2d 947, 595 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By decision dated September 26, 1990, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of two years, effective October 26, 1990 (see, Matter of Steenbergh, 165 AD2d 953). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) of this Court’s rules regarding reinstatement (22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]). Petitioner has advised that it has no grounds upon which to object to respondent’s application. Accordingly, respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Weiss, P. J., Levine, Mercure, Mahoney and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By decision dated September 26, 1990, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of two years, effective October 26, 1990 (see, Matter of Steenbergh, 165 AD2d 953). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) of this Court’s rules regarding reinstatement (22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]). Petitioner has advised that it has no grounds upon which to object to respondent’s application. Accordingly, respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Weiss, P. J., Levine, Mercure, Mahoney and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D.2d 947, 595 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steenbergh-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack