In re Steel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Steel

155 So. 3d 513, 2015 La. LEXIS 3, 2015 WL 247812

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 16, 2015

DocketNo. 2014-B-2367

StatusPublished

This text of 155 So. 3d 513 (In re Steel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Steel, 155 So. 3d 513, 2015 La. LEXIS 3, 2015 WL 247812 (La. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

_JjThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter and failed to communicate with a client. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Kevin M. Steel, Louisiana Bar Roll number 26125, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, fully deferred.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

_JjThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter and failed to communicate with a client. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Kevin M. Steel, Louisiana Bar Roll number 26125, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, fully deferred.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 So. 3d 513, 2015 La. LEXIS 3, 2015 WL 247812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steel-la-2015.