Home/Supreme Court/In re Stattmann

In re Stattmann

335 U.S. 805
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 11, 1948·No. No. 28; No. 39; No. 93; No. 103·Published

Opinion

Treating the application in each of these cases as a motion for leave to file a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus, leave to file is denied.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Burton are of the opinion that there is want of jurisdiction. U. S. Constitution, Article III, § 2, Clause 2; see Ex parte Betz and companion cases, all 329 U. S. 672 (1946); Milch v. United States, 332 U. S. 789 (1947); Brandt v. United States, 333 U. S. 836 (1948); In re Eichel, 333 U. S. 865 (1948). Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Murphy, and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that motions for leave to file should be granted [806]*806and that the cases should be set for argument forthwith. MR. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Stattmann, 335 U.S. 805 (1948).

335 U.S. 805 (In re Stattmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex parte Betz
329 U.S. 672 (Supreme Court, 1946)
Hurd v. Hodge
332 U.S. 789 (Supreme Court, 1947)
Brandt v. United States
333 U.S. 836 (Supreme Court, 1948)
In re Eichel
333 U.S. 865 (Supreme Court, 1948)