Home/Supreme Court/In re Stattmann

In re Stattmann

335 U.S. 805
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 11, 1948
DocketNo. 28; No. 39; No. 93; No. 103
StatusPublished

This text of 335 U.S. 805 (In re Stattmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Stattmann, 335 U.S. 805 (1948).

Opinion

Treating the application in each of these cases as a motion for leave to file a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus, leave to file is denied.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Burton are of the opinion that there is want of jurisdiction. U. S. Constitution, Article III, § 2, Clause 2; see Ex parte Betz and companion cases, all 329 U. S. 672 (1946); Milch v. United States, 332 U. S. 789 (1947); Brandt v. United States, 333 U. S. 836 (1948); In re Eichel, 333 U. S. 865 (1948). Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Murphy, and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that motions for leave to file should be granted [806]*806and that the cases should be set for argument forthwith. MR. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex parte Betz
329 U.S. 672 (Supreme Court, 1946)
Hurd v. Hodge
332 U.S. 789 (Supreme Court, 1947)
Brandt v. United States
333 U.S. 836 (Supreme Court, 1948)
In re Eichel
333 U.S. 865 (Supreme Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
335 U.S. 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stattmann-scotus-1948.