in Re State of Texas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-20-00054-CV
IN RE STATE OF TEXAS, ex rel. Todd A. “Tadeo” Durden, County Attorney Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 12, 2020 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On January 27, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by way of appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relator did not satisfy his burden and, therefore, is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 4845, 4863 and 4866, pending in the 63rd Judicial District Court, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re State of Texas (in Re State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.