in Re State of Texas
This text of in Re State of Texas (in Re State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00054-CV
IN RE STATE OF TEXAS, ex rel. Todd A. “Tadeo” Durden, County Attorney
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 12, 2020
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On January 27, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Mandamus is an
extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused
its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by way of
appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). After
considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relator did not satisfy his burden and,
therefore, is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is
denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 4845, 4863 and 4866, pending in the 63rd Judicial District Court, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-state-of-texas-texapp-2020.