in Re: State of Texas
This text of in Re: State of Texas (in Re: State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-06-144-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE: THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
On March 28, 2006, relator, The State of Texas, filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this Court. Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus asks this Court to order the Respondent, the Honorable Juan R. Partida, Presiding Judge of the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, to vacate his order dated February 1, 2005, and to enter an order that compels the real party in interest, Burns Motors, Inc., to produce the purchase order and salesman=s worksheet for the 1,395 sales transactions occurring between July 1, 2000 and June 30, 2001.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 3rd day of April, 2006.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-state-of-texas-texapp-2006.