in Re: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 12, 2021
Docket05-20-00993-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (in Re: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

DENY and Opinion Filed August 12, 2021

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00993-CV

IN RE STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-01193

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Pedersen, III, Carlyle, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Garcia In this original proceeding, relator State Farm asks us to compel the trial court

to vacate: (1) its order quashing and granting protection regarding discovery about

the medical provider’s reimbursement rates from insurers, and (2) its order striking

the section 18.001 counter-affidavits regarding the reasonableness of the medical

expenses. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In

re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Regarding relator’s challenge to the trial court’s order quashing and granting

protection regarding discovery about the medical provider’s reimbursement rates,

we conclude that relator has not shown his entitlement to the relief requested.

As for relator’s challenge to the order striking the section 18.001 counter-

affidavits, we note that the trial court ruled without the benefit of the Supreme

Court’s recent decision in In re Allstate Indemnity, No. 20-0071, 2021 WL 1822946

(Tex. May 7, 2021) (orig. proceeding). Because the trial court should have the

opportunity to reconsider its orders in light of that opinion, we deny the petition for

writ of mandamus without prejudice to give the trial court that opportunity. See In

re Parks, No. 20-0345, 2021 WL 2603690 (Tex. Jun. 25, 2021) (orig. proceeding)

(denying petition for writ of mandamus without prejudice to give trial court

opportunity to reconsider order in light of In re Allstate). We also lift the stay issued

by this Court’s order dated January 7, 2021.

/Dennise Garcia/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE

200993F.P05

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-company-texapp-2021.