in Re: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Todd Joseph Dauper
Opinion
Denied; Opinion Filed August 22, 2019.
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00920-CV
IN RE STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY AND TODD JOSEPH DAUPER, Relators
Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-05914-D
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Nowell Before the Court is relators’ August 5, 2019 petition for writ of mandamus in which relators
contend the trial court abused its discretion by denying their motion to abate extra-contractual
claims in the underlying underinsured motorist lawsuit. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relators
must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relators have no
adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the mandamus record, we conclude relators have not
shown they are entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a)
(the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the
relief sought).
/Erin A. Nowell/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
190920F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Todd Joseph Dauper (in Re: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Todd Joseph Dauper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.