in Re State Farm Lloyds
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-15-00474-CV
IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 5, 2015
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On July 28, 2015, relator State Farm Lloyds filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an
opposed motion for temporary relief pending a ruling on the mandamus petition. The court has
considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the
relief sought. While we recognize that the practical implications of sharing provisions in protective
orders may be changing in multi-district litigation in this state, as an intermediate appellate court,
we are bound to follow the precedent established by the Texas Supreme Court in Garcia v. Peeples,
which we believe to be the law applicable in this instance. 734 S.W.2d 343 (Tex. 1987); see TEX.
R. JUD. ADMIN. 13, reprinted in TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN., tit. 2, subtit. F app. (West 2013); TEX.
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2014-CVF-001162-D1, styled Raul Rodriguez and Noemi Rodriguez v. State Farm Lloyds and Felipe Farias, and 2014-CVF-001048-D1, styled Alma Pena v. State Farm Lloyds and Becky Lanier, pending in the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Jose A. Lopez presiding. 04-15-00474-CV
GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 74.161-.164 (West 2013). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus
and the motion for temporary relief are denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re State Farm Lloyds (in Re State Farm Lloyds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.