in Re State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freyman, and Ronald Castillo

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 7, 2014
Docket13-14-00629-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freyman, and Ronald Castillo (in Re State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freyman, and Ronald Castillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freyman, and Ronald Castillo, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-14-00629-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS, RICHARD FREYMANN, AND RONALD CASTILLO

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relators, State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freymann, and Ronald Castillo, filed a

petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court direct respondent, the Honorable

Rose Guerra Reyna, Presiding Judge of the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County,

Texas, to withdraw her order denying relators’ verified plea in abatement and to enter an

order abating the suit for damages brought against relators by the real parties in interest,

Homero Gracia and Maria Gracia, until sixty days after they provide relators with a notice

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions). letter for their claim stating the specific, separate amounts for the claimed damages and

attorney’s fees. See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d

C.S.) (“Prior Notice of Action”); id. § 541.155 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.)

(“Abatement”); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1 (“Commencement” of Original Proceedings). In

addition, relators request that this Court issue immediate temporary relief staying

respondent’s order denying the plea in abatement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10

(“Temporary Relief”).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

and the applicable law, is of the opinion that the petition for writ of mandamus should be

denied for the reasons expressed in our opinion in In re State Farm Lloyds, Richard

Freymann, and Nathan Burris, No. 13-14-00347-CV, 2014 WL 4243701, at **4–9 (Tex.

App.—Corpus Christi Aug. 27, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op). Accordingly, the

Court DENIES the petition for writ of mandamus and request for immediate temporary

relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 29th day of October, 2014.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 541.154
Texas IN § 541.154

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freyman, and Ronald Castillo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-state-farm-lloyds-richard-freyman-and-ronald-texapp-2014.