in Re State Farm Lloyds, Antone Eugene Jones, and Gregory Latty
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-14-00850-CV Style: In re State Farm Lloyds, Antone Eugene Jones, and Gregory Latty Date motion filed*: November 10, 2014 Type of motions: Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus Parties filing motions: Real Party in Interest Document to be filed: Response
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: December 10, 2014 No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.
Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ The unopposed motion to abate this case is denied, but the alternative motion for extension of time to file response to petition for writ of mandamus is granted, but counsel is warned that no further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Laura C. Higley
Date: November 13, 2014
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re State Farm Lloyds, Antone Eugene Jones, and Gregory Latty (in Re State Farm Lloyds, Antone Eugene Jones, and Gregory Latty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.