In re State Farm Insurance
This text of 35 A.D.3d 867 (In re State Farm Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, National [868]*868Continental Insurance Company appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Carey, J.H.O.) dated September 23, 2005, which, after a framed-issue hearing, granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Jeanne Colangelo and Richard Colangelo demanded arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits from their insurance company State Farm Insurance Company (hereinafter State Farm) after they allegedly sustained damages in a motor vehicle accident involving a truck owned by Stella Express Trucking (hereinafter Stella). State Farm commenced this proceeding to permanently stay arbitration on the ground that the truck was insured by National Continental Insurance Company (hereinafter NCIC) at the time of the accident. After NCIC claimed that the policy had been cancelled prior to the accident, the Supreme Court ordered a framed-issue hearing on coverage. After the hearing, the Supreme Court determined that the NCIC policy was not validly cancelled under controlling New Jersey law based upon two separate and independent grounds, and permanently stayed arbitration. NCIC appeals. We affirm.
On appeal, NCIC does not challenge the Supreme Court’s determination that the failure to provide notice of the cancellation to the producer (broker) of the policy rendered the attempted cancellation ineffective under controlling New Jersey law, and that this constituted a separate and independent basis to hold the purported cancellation of the policy ineffective.
NCIC’s remaining contentions are without merit. Crane, J.E, Ritter, Lunn and Covello, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 A.D.3d 867, 827 N.Y.S.2d 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-state-farm-insurance-nyappdiv-2006.