Home/Supreme Court of South Carolina/In re Starks

In re Starks

474 S.E.2d 421, 322 S.C. 564, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 138
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided August 9, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent is an attorney licensed to practice law in South Carolina. He petitions to be transferred to disability inactive status pursuant to Paragraph 19 of Rule 413, SCACR.

The petition is granted and respondent is transferred to disability inactive status until further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Ernest A. Finnev. Jr.. C.J.

/s/ Jean H. Toal. J.

/s/ James E. Moore. J.

/a/ John H. Waller. Jr.. J.

/s/ E.C. Burnett. III. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Starks, 474 S.E.2d 421, 322 S.C. 564, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 138 (S.C. 1996).

474 S.E.2d 421 (In re Starks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Starks
542 S.E.2d 726 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2001)