In re Starks

474 S.E.2d 421, 322 S.C. 564, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 138
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedAugust 9, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 474 S.E.2d 421 (In re Starks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Starks, 474 S.E.2d 421, 322 S.C. 564, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 138 (S.C. 1996).

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent is an attorney licensed to practice law in South Carolina. He petitions to be transferred to disability inactive status pursuant to Paragraph 19 of Rule 413, SCACR.

The petition is granted and respondent is transferred to disability inactive status until further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Ernest A. Finnev. Jr.. C.J.

/s/ Jean H. Toal. J.

/s/ James E. Moore. J.

/a/ John H. Waller. Jr.. J.

/s/ E.C. Burnett. III. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Starks
542 S.E.2d 726 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 S.E.2d 421, 322 S.C. 564, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-starks-sc-1996.