In re Starks

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Starks

946 N.E.2d 243, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1486

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 5, 2011·Published

Opinion

On December 31, 2008, this court found Verdell Starks to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.5(B). This court further ordered that Starks was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On April 28, 2011, Starks submitted two motions for leave to file appeals of decisions in two court of appeals’ cases.

Upon review of the proffered filings, the court finds them without merit. Accordingly, it is ordered by the court that both of Starks’ motions for leave to file an appeal are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On December 31, 2008, this court found Verdell Starks to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.5(B). This court further ordered that Starks was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On April 28, 2011, Starks submitted two motions for leave to file appeals of decisions in two court of appeals’ cases.

Upon review of the proffered filings, the court finds them without merit. Accordingly, it is ordered by the court that both of Starks’ motions for leave to file an appeal are denied.

In re Starks, 946 N.E.2d 243, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1486 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

946 N.E.2d 243 (In re Starks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.