in Re StarFlite Management Group, Inc. D/B/A StarFlite Aviation
Opinion
On motion for rehearing, the relator suggests our Opinion can be viewed as requiring disclosure of the names and activities of customers not involved in this litigation, the disclosure of which would not aid in the resolution of this dispute. In modifying its order, we are confident the trial court will follow the Opinion of this Court and require sufficient pleadings and narrowly tailored discovery requests. See also In re Sears, Roebuck and Co., 146 S.W.3d 328, 332-34 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 2004, orig. proceeding).
The motion for rehearing is overruled.
PER CURIAM
Opinion Delivered May 19, 2005
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
1. Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re StarFlite Management Group, Inc. D/B/A StarFlite Aviation (in Re StarFlite Management Group, Inc. D/B/A StarFlite Aviation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.