In re Starcke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Starcke

191 A.D. 925

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1920·Published

Opinion

Orders reversed, without costs, and motions for mandamus denied, without costs, upon the ground that the petitions were fatally defective in that their certificates of character purported to be signed by members of the committee to fill vacancies, when the petitions themselves nominated or named no such committee, and that the board of elections was acting within its authority in refusing to print the names of the relators as candidates. (See Matter of McGrath, 189 App. Div. 146.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders reversed, without costs, and motions for mandamus denied, without costs, upon the ground that the petitions were fatally defective in that their certificates of character purported to be signed by members of the committee to fill vacancies, when the petitions themselves nominated or named no such committee, and that the board of elections was acting within its authority in refusing to print the names of the relators as candidates. (See Matter of McGrath, 189 App. Div. 146.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.

In re Starcke, 191 A.D. 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

191 A.D. 925 (In re Starcke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related