in Re Starbucks Corporation Hilton Displays, LLC Young Electric Signs Company
This text of in Re Starbucks Corporation Hilton Displays, LLC Young Electric Signs Company (in Re Starbucks Corporation Hilton Displays, LLC Young Electric Signs Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 4, 2020.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-20-00609-CV
IN RE STARBUCKS CORPORATION, HILTON DISPLAYS, LLC, AND YOUNG ELECTRIC SIGNS COMPANY, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 113th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-58812
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On September 3, 2020, relators Starbucks Corporation, Hilton Displays, LLC, and Young Electric Signs Company filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable Rabeea Sultan Collier, presiding judge of the 113th District Court of Harris County, to vacate her September 2, 2020 order denying relators’ emergency motion for continuance and to grant the motion.
Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny relators’ emergency motion for temporary relief.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jewell, and Zimmerer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Starbucks Corporation Hilton Displays, LLC Young Electric Signs Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-starbucks-corporation-hilton-displays-llc-young-electric-signs-texapp-2020.