In re Stapleton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Stapleton

257 A.D. 1072, 14 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9119

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 11, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 257 A.D. 1072 (In re Stapleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Stapleton, 257 A.D. 1072, 14 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying application to direct the board of elections of the city of New York to place on the official Democratic primary ballot for the Fifth Municipal Court District for the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, the name of Thomas J. Stapleton as a candidate for election to the party position as justice of the Municipal Court reversed on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term for hearing on the issues of fact raised. The residence of the subscribing witness having been correctly stated, the fact that in some of the [1073]*1073sheets there was error in the numbering of the election district does not invalidate the petition. There was a substantial compliance with section 135 of the Election Law. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying application to direct the board of elections of the city of New York to place on the official Democratic primary ballot for the Fifth Municipal Court District for the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, the name of Thomas J. Stapleton as a candidate for election to the party position as justice of the Municipal Court reversed on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term for hearing on the issues of fact raised. The residence of the subscribing witness having been correctly stated, the fact that in some of the [1073]*1073sheets there was error in the numbering of the election district does not invalidate the petition. There was a substantial compliance with section 135 of the Election Law. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 1072, 14 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stapleton-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack